pool/os-autoinst
SHA256
17
0
Fork 3
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

Update to 5.1770127521.c249fe9 5.1770127521.c249fe9 5.1770127521.c249fe9 5.1770127521.c249fe9 #14

Closed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow wants to merge 1 commits from os-autoinst-obs-workflow/os-autoinst:factory into leap-16.0
pull from: os-autoinst-obs-workflow/os-autoinst:factory
merge into: pool:leap-16.0
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files Changed 8 +18 -6702
os-autoinst-obs-workflow commented 2026-02-05 16:41:39 +01:00
Contributor
Copy Link

Automatic submission via https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-scripts/blob/master/os-autoinst-obs-auto-submit

Automatic submission via https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-scripts/blob/master/os-autoinst-obs-auto-submit
os-autoinst-obs-workflow added 1 commit 2026-02-05 16:41:39 +01:00
Update to 5.1770127521.c249fe9 34aae9aaf5 
5.1770127521.c249fe9
5.1770127521.c249fe9
5.1770127521.c249fe9
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-02-05 16:42:19 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-02-05 16:42:19 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-02-05 16:42:19 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-02-05 16:43:45 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-02-05 16:48:13 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2026-02-05 16:56:01 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (315028)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/503703): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (315028) ```
report.md
1.1 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-02-05 16:56:01 +01:00
mkittler reviewed 2026-02-06 10:58:07 +01:00
os-autoinst.changes
@@ -5,2 +9,3 @@
* test: Use `ENABLE_MODERN_PERL_FEATURES=1` in test suite
* feat: Allow enabling strict/warnings/signatures globally
* fix: Improve wrong comment about enablement of modern Perl features
* Replace remaining functions with subroutine signatures in 18-qemu.t
mkittler commented 2026-02-06 10:58:07 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

All these deleted lines are probably not good. Not sure why this happens now, though. There are also some additional so it is not like the output is completely lost.

All these deleted lines are *probably* not good. Not sure why this happens now, though. There are also *some* additional so it is not like the output is completely lost.

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
maintenance-release-review
opensuse-review
legaldb
mkittler
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/os-autoinst#14
Delete Branch "os-autoinst-obs-workflow/os-autoinst:factory"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?