pool/polymake
SHA256
17
0
Fork 3
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

Reenable callable library #1

Manually merged
jengelh merged 7 commits from jengelh/polymake:master into leap-16.0 2026-01-15 19:44:48 +01:00
Conversation 15 Commits 7 Files Changed 4 +81 -13
jengelh commented 2026-01-13 21:13:32 +01:00
Contributor
Copy Link

Update polymake to the current version to make polymake-config work again (https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256453 ). There are no downstream users of the libpolymake4_15 library (only users of /usr/bin/polymake), so no subsequent rebuilds needed.

Update polymake to the current version to make polymake-config work again (https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256453 ). There are no downstream users of the libpolymake4_15 library (only users of /usr/bin/polymake), so no subsequent rebuilds needed.
jengelh added 6 commits 2026-01-13 21:13:33 +01:00
polymake 4.13 4d75ffd5b3
Add gcc15.patch d8d5e7cbb2
polymake 4.14 0901dfa214
Request pkgconfig(cddgmp) 75e4451a1c
polymake 4.15 aa680b1bed
Reenable callable library mode 680ef020be
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-01-13 21:13:42 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-01-13 21:13:44 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-01-13 21:13:45 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-01-13 21:16:06 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-01-13 21:17:06 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
legaldb commented 2026-01-13 21:28:13 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal review in progress.

Legal review [in progress](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/497542).
report.md
1.4 KiB
jengelh added 1 commit 2026-01-13 21:50:50 +01:00
Enable polyDB 7829f5e5e7
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-01-13 21:56:47 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-01-13 21:57:16 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
legaldb commented 2026-01-13 22:08:21 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal review in progress.

Legal review [in progress](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/497548).
report.md
1.4 KiB
rfrohl commented 2026-01-15 12:44:51 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@jengelh: build is not starting[0], error 'nothing provides pkgconfig(cddgmp)'. Quick search did not turn anything up. Are you planning to submit that as well ?

[0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:323

@jengelh: build is not starting[0], error 'nothing provides pkgconfig(cddgmp)'. Quick search did not turn anything up. Are you planning to submit that as well ? [0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:323
msmeissn commented 2026-01-15 15:32:26 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2026-01-15 15:32:31 +01:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
rfrohl commented 2026-01-15 17:02:45 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@jengelh: build is not starting[0], error 'nothing provides pkgconfig(cddgmp)'. Quick search did not turn anything up. Are you planning to submit that as well ?

[0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:323

thanks, builds mostly fine. Some issue with ppc64le ATM, but lets see if we can massage that to work out.

> @jengelh: build is not starting[0], error 'nothing provides pkgconfig(cddgmp)'. Quick search did not turn anything up. Are you planning to submit that as well ? > > [0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:323 thanks, builds mostly fine. Some issue with `ppc64le` ATM, but lets see if we can massage that to work out.
legaldb commented 2026-01-15 17:18:23 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed by dec16180 as acceptable_by_lawyer:

No non-commercial lienses found. See 	*  The GNU General Public License cited below applies to the           *	
3	*  entire polymake code written in whatever programming language.      *	
4	*                                                                      *	
5	*  There are, however, parts of third-party software included in this  *	
6	*  distribution with the solely aim to make the installation process   *	
7	*  easier.  Most are protected by GPL too, but for some packages       *	
8	*  other open source licenses apply.  In any case, free non-commercial *	
9	*  use and redistribution are allowed without restrictions.            *	
10	*                                                                      *	
11	*  Please refer to the appropriate copyright notices in the            *	
12	*   external/*  subdirectories for details.
Legal reviewed by *dec16180* as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/497548): ``` No non-commercial lienses found. See * The GNU General Public License cited below applies to the * 3 * entire polymake code written in whatever programming language. * 4 * * 5 * There are, however, parts of third-party software included in this * 6 * distribution with the solely aim to make the installation process * 7 * easier. Most are protected by GPL too, but for some packages * 8 * other open source licenses apply. In any case, free non-commercial * 9 * use and redistribution are allowed without restrictions. * 10 * * 11 * Please refer to the appropriate copyright notices in the * 12 * external/* subdirectories for details. ```
report.md
1.4 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-01-15 17:18:23 +01:00
oertel commented 2026-01-15 18:38:27 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
oertel commented 2026-01-15 18:38:28 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2026-01-15 18:41:05 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
jengelh manually merged commit 7829f5e5e7 into leap-16.0 2026-01-15 19:44:48 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
maintenance-release-review
legaldb
opensuse-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/polymake#1
Delete Branch "jengelh/polymake:master"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?