pool/python-Django
SHA256
17
0
Fork 3
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

CVE-2025-59681, CVE-2025-59682 #2

Manually merged
pool merged 1 commits from mcalabkova/python-Django:leap-16.0 into leap-16.0 2025-10-31 09:47:24 +01:00
Conversation 10 Commits 1 Files Changed 4 +258
mcalabkova commented 2025-10-02 12:11:01 +02:00
Contributor
Copy Link
No description provided.
mcalabkova added 1 commit 2025-10-02 12:11:02 +02:00
CVE-2025-59681, CVE-2025-59682 a2220d5d79
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-02 12:11:22 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from packagehub-review 2025-10-02 12:11:22 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-02 12:15:03 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-02 12:30:29 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (464325)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/468424): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (464325) ```
report.md
1.5 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-02 12:30:35 +02:00
mcalabkova commented 2025-10-02 13:11:56 +02:00
Author
Contributor
Copy Link

bsc#1250485 bsc#1250487

bsc#1250485 bsc#1250487
packagehub-review requested review from bigironman 2025-10-08 18:45:51 +02:00
packagehub-review requested review from lkocman-factory 2025-10-08 18:45:52 +02:00
packagehub-review requested review from maxlin_factory 2025-10-08 18:45:52 +02:00
packagehub-review requested review from smithfarm 2025-10-08 18:45:52 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-16 13:14:48 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2025-10-16 13:14:48 +02:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-16 13:24:10 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-16 13:24:10 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
rfrohl commented 2025-10-16 13:29:29 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-16 13:34:14 +02:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
eroca removed review request for packagehub-review 2025-10-23 09:58:59 +02:00
eroca removed review request for bigironman 2025-10-23 09:59:01 +02:00
eroca removed review request for maxlin_factory 2025-10-23 09:59:02 +02:00
eroca removed review request for lkocman-factory 2025-10-23 09:59:03 +02:00
eroca removed review request for smithfarm 2025-10-23 09:59:04 +02:00
eroca commented 2025-10-23 09:59:38 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

@opensuse-review: approve

@opensuse-review: approve
opensuse-review approved these changes 2025-10-23 10:01:42 +02:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
pool manually merged commit a2220d5d79 into leap-16.0 2025-10-31 09:47:24 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
legaldb
maintenance-release-review
opensuse-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/python-Django#2
Delete Branch "mcalabkova/python-Django:leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?