- update to 5.5.0:
* Support `redirect` in SPF OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:python/python-checkdmarc?expand=0&rev=7
This commit is contained in:
commit
2aa4f41f73
23
.gitattributes
vendored
Normal file
23
.gitattributes
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
## Default LFS
|
||||
*.7z filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.bsp filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.bz2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.gem filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.gz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.jar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.lz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.lzma filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.obscpio filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.oxt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.rpm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.tbz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.tbz2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.tgz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.ttf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.txz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.whl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.xz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||
*.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
1
.gitignore
vendored
Normal file
1
.gitignore
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
.osc
|
3
checkdmarc-5.3.1.tar.gz
Normal file
3
checkdmarc-5.3.1.tar.gz
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
||||
oid sha256:1d71e7fa611fa8faa36fad09416b5e2c3265d026d3b5209c051f4e292565e332
|
||||
size 36307
|
3
checkdmarc-5.5.0.tar.gz
Normal file
3
checkdmarc-5.5.0.tar.gz
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
||||
oid sha256:d775f566f8fdd584adb9a26e792cfe1565cdf6bd50c54fe7b6d8443ce6db68cf
|
||||
size 36103
|
84
python-checkdmarc.changes
Normal file
84
python-checkdmarc.changes
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Thu Oct 10 15:49:23 UTC 2024 - Dirk Müller <dmueller@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
- update to 5.5.0:
|
||||
* Support `redirect` in SPF
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Thu Feb 29 01:43:19 UTC 2024 - Steve Kowalik <steven.kowalik@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
- Update to 5.3.1:
|
||||
* Ignore UnicodeDecodeError exceptions when querying for TXT records
|
||||
* Check DNSSEC on MX hostnames
|
||||
* USE DNSSEC when requesting DNSKEY records
|
||||
* Do not require an RRSIG answer when querying for DNSKEY records
|
||||
* Pass in nameservers and timeout when running get_dnskey recursively
|
||||
* Properly cache DNSKEY answers
|
||||
* Fix exception handling for query_mta_sts_record
|
||||
* Check for TLSA records
|
||||
* Add support for parsing SMTP TLS Reporting (RFC8460) DNS records
|
||||
* Add missing import dns.dnssec
|
||||
* Always use the actual subdomain or domain provided
|
||||
* Include MTA-STS and BIMI results in CSV output
|
||||
* Added the include_tag_descriptions parameter to
|
||||
checkdmarc.bimi.check_bimi()
|
||||
* Added the exception class MTASTSPolicyDownloadError
|
||||
* Major refactoring: Change from a single module to a package of modules,
|
||||
with each checked standard as its own package
|
||||
* Add support for MTA-STS RFC 8461
|
||||
* Add support for BIMI
|
||||
* Specify a BIMI selector using the --bimi-selector/-b option
|
||||
* Fix SPF query error and warning messages
|
||||
* Add support for null MX records - RFC 7505
|
||||
* Make DMARC retorting URI error messages more clear
|
||||
* Fix compatibility with Python 3.8
|
||||
* SPFRecordNotFound exception now includes a domain argument
|
||||
* The DMARC missing authorization error message now includes the full
|
||||
expected DNS record
|
||||
* Properly parse DMARC and BIMI records for domains that do not have an
|
||||
identified base domain
|
||||
* Add ignore_unrelated_records argument to query_dmarc_record()
|
||||
* Replace publicsuffix2 with publicsuffixlist
|
||||
* Maintain the original character case of the DMARC record
|
||||
* Always treat tag names as lowercase
|
||||
* Always treat the DMARC v tag value as if it was uppercase
|
||||
* Always treat the DMARC p, and fo tag values as if they were lowercase
|
||||
* Always treat URI schemes as lowercase, but maintain the case of the address
|
||||
* Ignore case and whitespace when parsing DMARC and BIMI key=value pairs
|
||||
* Handle missing PTR records more gracefully
|
||||
* Redundant DMARC fo tag values now result in a warning
|
||||
* Detect non-trivial loops
|
||||
* Raise a SPFSyntaxError exception when an IP address and IP version do
|
||||
not match
|
||||
* Fix raising the DMARCRecordNotFound exception when a DMARC record does
|
||||
not exist
|
||||
* Add void lookup limit
|
||||
* Add Support for User Defined DNS Resolver Object
|
||||
* Fix DNS caching
|
||||
* Fix CSV output
|
||||
* Always parse RUA and RUF fields, even if other parts of the record are
|
||||
invalid
|
||||
* Migrate build from setuptools to hatch
|
||||
- Stop shipping LICENSE, now included directly.
|
||||
- Refresh tests.py from upstream.
|
||||
- Switch to pyproject and patch macros.
|
||||
- No more greedy globs in %files.
|
||||
- Drop skip-broken-tests.patch, not required.
|
||||
- Add patch skip-network-tests.patch, skip tests that require network access.
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Wed Jul 21 10:20:44 UTC 2021 - Matej Cepl <mcepl@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
- Use %pyunittest macro instead of directly calling %python_exec
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Tue Jul 20 17:00:06 UTC 2021 - Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>
|
||||
|
||||
- Use tests.py from github
|
||||
- Add patch:
|
||||
* skip-broken-tests.patch
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Sat Jul 17 10:14:54 UTC 2021 - Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>
|
||||
|
||||
- Initial package, version 4.4.1
|
86
python-checkdmarc.spec
Normal file
86
python-checkdmarc.spec
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
#
|
||||
# spec file for package python-checkdmarc
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2024 SUSE LLC
|
||||
# Copyright (c) 2021, Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>
|
||||
#
|
||||
# All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
|
||||
# remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
|
||||
# upon. The license for this file, and modifications and additions to the
|
||||
# file, is the same license as for the pristine package itself (unless the
|
||||
# license for the pristine package is not an Open Source License, in which
|
||||
# case the license is the MIT License). An "Open Source License" is a
|
||||
# license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9)
|
||||
# published by the Open Source Initiative.
|
||||
|
||||
# Please submit bugfixes or comments via https://bugs.opensuse.org/
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Name: python-checkdmarc
|
||||
Version: 5.5.0
|
||||
Release: 0
|
||||
Summary: A Python module and command line parser for SPF and DMARC records
|
||||
License: Apache-2.0
|
||||
URL: https://domainaware.github.io/checkdmarc
|
||||
Source: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/c/checkdmarc/checkdmarc-%{version}.tar.gz
|
||||
Source1: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/domainaware/checkdmarc/master/tests.py
|
||||
Patch0: skip-network-tests.patch
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module hatchling}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module pip}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module wheel}
|
||||
BuildRequires: fdupes
|
||||
BuildRequires: python-rpm-macros
|
||||
Requires: python-cryptography
|
||||
Requires: python-dnspython >= 2.0.0
|
||||
Requires: python-expiringdict >= 1.1.4
|
||||
Requires: python-publicsuffixlist
|
||||
Requires: python-pyleri >= 1.3.2
|
||||
Requires: python-requests >= 2.25.0
|
||||
Requires: python-timeout-decorator >= 0.4.1
|
||||
Requires(post): update-alternatives
|
||||
Requires(postun): update-alternatives
|
||||
BuildArch: noarch
|
||||
# SECTION test requirements
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module dnspython >= 2.0.0}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module expiringdict >= 1.1.4}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module publicsuffixlist}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module pyleri >= 1.3.2}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module requests >= 2.25.0}
|
||||
BuildRequires: %{python_module timeout-decorator >= 0.4.1}
|
||||
# /SECTION
|
||||
%python_subpackages
|
||||
|
||||
%description
|
||||
A Python module and command line parser for SPF and DMARC records.
|
||||
|
||||
%prep
|
||||
%setup -q -n checkdmarc-%{version}
|
||||
cp %{SOURCE1} .
|
||||
%patch -P 0 -p0
|
||||
|
||||
%build
|
||||
%pyproject_wheel
|
||||
|
||||
%install
|
||||
%pyproject_install
|
||||
%python_clone -a %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/checkdmarc
|
||||
%python_expand %fdupes %{buildroot}%{$python_sitelib}
|
||||
|
||||
%post
|
||||
%python_install_alternative checkdmarc
|
||||
|
||||
%postun
|
||||
%python_uninstall_alternative checkdmarc
|
||||
|
||||
%check
|
||||
%pyunittest -v tests.py
|
||||
|
||||
%files %{python_files}
|
||||
%license LICENSE
|
||||
%doc README.md
|
||||
%python_alternative %{_bindir}/checkdmarc
|
||||
%{python_sitelib}/checkdmarc
|
||||
%{python_sitelib}/checkdmarc-%{version}.dist-info
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
58
skip-network-tests.patch
Normal file
58
skip-network-tests.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
--- tests.py~ 2024-02-29 12:22:56.007309853 +1100
|
||||
+++ tests.py 2024-02-29 12:25:49.618057933 +1100
|
||||
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
"""Automated tests"""
|
||||
|
||||
+import os.path
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from collections import OrderedDict
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -94,6 +95,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(results["warnings"]), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testSplitSPFRecord(self):
|
||||
"""Split SPF records are parsed properly"""
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -129,6 +131,7 @@
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFRecordNotFound,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testTooManySPFDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 10 SPF mechanisms that cause DNS lookups raise
|
||||
SPFTooManyDNSLookups"""
|
||||
@@ -144,6 +147,7 @@
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFTooManyDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testTooManySPFVoidDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 2 void DNS lookups"""
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -216,6 +220,7 @@
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFIncludeLoop,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testSPFMissingMXRecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no MX records"""
|
||||
@@ -226,6 +231,7 @@
|
||||
self.assertIn("{0} does not have any MX records".format(domain),
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testSPFMissingARecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no A records"""
|
||||
@@ -236,6 +242,7 @@
|
||||
self.assertIn("cardinalhealth.net does not have any A/AAAA records",
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
+ @unittest.skipUnless(os.path.exists("/etc/resolv.conf"), "no network")
|
||||
def testDMARCPctLessThan100Warning(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if the DMARC pvt value is less than 100"""
|
||||
|
279
tests.py
Normal file
279
tests.py
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
|
||||
"""Automated tests"""
|
||||
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from collections import OrderedDict
|
||||
|
||||
import checkdmarc
|
||||
import checkdmarc.utils
|
||||
import checkdmarc.spf
|
||||
import checkdmarc.dmarc
|
||||
import checkdmarc.dnssec
|
||||
|
||||
known_good_domains = [
|
||||
"fbi.gov",
|
||||
"pm.me"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
@unittest.skip
|
||||
def testKnownGood(self):
|
||||
"""Domains with known good STARTTLS support, SPF and DMARC records"""
|
||||
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.check_domains(known_good_domains)
|
||||
for result in results:
|
||||
spf_error = None
|
||||
dmarc_error = None
|
||||
for mx in result["mx"]["hosts"]:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
mx["starttls"], True,
|
||||
"Host of known good domain {0} failed STARTTLS check: {1}"
|
||||
"\n\n{0}".format(result["domain"], mx["hostname"])
|
||||
)
|
||||
if "error" in result["spf"]:
|
||||
spf_error = result["spf"]["error"]
|
||||
if "error" in result["dmarc"]:
|
||||
dmarc_error = result["dmarc"]["error"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["spf"]["valid"], True,
|
||||
"Known good domain {0} failed SPF check:"
|
||||
"\n\n{1}".format(result["domain"], spf_error))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["dmarc"]["valid"], True,
|
||||
"Known good domain {0} failed DMARC check:"
|
||||
"\n\n{1}".format(result["domain"], dmarc_error))
|
||||
|
||||
def testDMARCMixedFormatting(self):
|
||||
"""DMARC records with extra spaces and mixed case are still valid"""
|
||||
examples = [
|
||||
"v=DMARC1;p=ReJect",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1;p=reject;",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1\t;\tp=reject\t;",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1\t;\tp\t\t\t=\t\t\treject\t;",
|
||||
"V=DMARC1;p=reject;"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for example in examples:
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record(example, "")
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(parsed_record, OrderedDict)
|
||||
|
||||
def testGetBaseDomain(self):
|
||||
subdomain = "foo.example.com"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "example.com"
|
||||
|
||||
# Test reserved domains
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.example"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.example"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.test"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.test"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.invalid"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.invalid"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.localhost"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.localhost"
|
||||
|
||||
# Test newer PSL entries
|
||||
subdomain = "e3191.c.akamaiedge.net"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "c.akamaiedge.net"
|
||||
|
||||
def testUppercaseSPFMechanism(self):
|
||||
"""Treat uppercase SPF"SPF mechanisms as valid"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 IP4:147.75.8.208 -ALL"
|
||||
domain = "example.no"
|
||||
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(results["warnings"]), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSplitSPFRecord(self):
|
||||
"""Split SPF records are parsed properly"""
|
||||
|
||||
rec = '"v=spf1 ip4:147.75.8.208 " "include:_spf.salesforce.com -all"'
|
||||
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(rec, "example.com")
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed_record["parsed"]["all"], "fail")
|
||||
|
||||
def testJunkAfterAll(self):
|
||||
"""Ignore any mechanisms after the all mechanism, but warn about it"""
|
||||
rec = "v=spf1 ip4:213.5.39.110 -all MS=83859DAEBD1978F9A7A67D3"
|
||||
domain = "avd.dk"
|
||||
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(rec, domain)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(parsed_record["warnings"]), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
@unittest.skip
|
||||
def testDNSSEC(self):
|
||||
"""Test known good DNSSEC"""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(checkdmarc.dnssec.test_dnssec("fbi.gov"), True)
|
||||
|
||||
def testIncludeMissingSPF(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records that include domains that are missing SPF records
|
||||
raise SPFRecordNotFound"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 include:spf.comendosystems.com ' \
|
||||
'include:bounce.peytz.dk include:etrack.indicia.dk ' \
|
||||
'include:etrack1.com include:mail1.dialogportal.com ' \
|
||||
'include:mail2.dialogportal.com a:mailrelay.jppol.dk ' \
|
||||
'a:sendmail.jppol.dk ?all"'
|
||||
domain = "ekstrabladet.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFRecordNotFound,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testTooManySPFDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 10 SPF mechanisms that cause DNS lookups raise
|
||||
SPFTooManyDNSLookups"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 a include:_spf.salesforce.com " \
|
||||
"include:spf.protection.outlook.com " \
|
||||
"include:spf.constantcontact.com " \
|
||||
"include:_spf.elasticemail.com " \
|
||||
"include:servers.mcsv.net " \
|
||||
"include:_spf.google.com " \
|
||||
"~all"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFTooManyDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testTooManySPFVoidDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 2 void DNS lookups"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 a:13Mk4olS9VWhQqXRl90fKJrD.example.com " \
|
||||
"mx:SfGiqBnQfRbOMapQJhozxo2B.example.com " \
|
||||
"a:VAFeyU9N2KJX518aGsN3w6VS.example.com " \
|
||||
"~all"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFTooManyVoidDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFSyntaxErrors(self):
|
||||
"""SPF record syntax errors raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 mx a:mail.cohaesio.net ' \
|
||||
'include: trustpilotservice.com ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "2021.ai"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip4:78.46.96.236 +a +mx +ip4:138.201.239.158 " \
|
||||
"+ip4:78.46.224.83 " \
|
||||
"+ip4:relay.mailchannels.net +ip4:138.201.60.20 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6inIPv4(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip4:1200:0000:AB00:1234:0000:2552:7777:1313 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4Range(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip4:78.46.96.236/99 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip6:1200:0000:AB00:1234:O000:2552:7777:1313 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4inIPv6(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip6:78.46.96.236 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6Range(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
record = "v=spf1 ip6:1200:0000:AB00:1234:0000:2552:7777:1313/130 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFIncludeLoop(self):
|
||||
"""SPF record with include loop raises SPFIncludeLoop"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 include:example.com"'
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFIncludeLoop,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFMissingMXRecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no MX records"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 mx ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "seanthegeek.net"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("{0} does not have any MX records".format(domain),
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFMissingARecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no A records"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 a ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "cardinalhealth.net"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("cardinalhealth.net does not have any A/AAAA records",
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
def testDMARCPctLessThan100Warning(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if the DMARC pvt value is less than 100"""
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; fo=1; pct=50; adkim=r; " \
|
||||
"aspf=r; rf=afrf; ri=86400; " \
|
||||
"rua=mailto:eits.dmarcrua@energy.gov; " \
|
||||
"ruf=mailto:eits.dmarcruf@energy.gov"
|
||||
domain = "energy.gov"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record(dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("pct value is less than 100",
|
||||
results["warnings"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
def testInvalidDMARCURI(self):
|
||||
"""An invalid DMARC report URI raises InvalidDMARCReportURI"""
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov," \
|
||||
"mailto:dmarcreports@usdoj.gov"
|
||||
domain = "dea.gov"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=__" \
|
||||
"mailto:reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov," \
|
||||
"mailto:dmarcreports@usdoj.gov"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testInvalidDMARCPolicyValue(self):
|
||||
"""An invalid DMARC policy value raises InvalidDMARCTagValue """
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=foo; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCTagValue,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record,
|
||||
dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main(verbosity=2)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user