pool/python-Django
SHA256
17
0
Fork 4
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

Bug 1259142 (CVE-2026-25674) - VUL-0: CVE-2026-25674: python-Django: race condition can lead to potential incorrect permissions on newly created file system objects #6

Open
mcalabkova wants to merge 1 commits from mcalabkova/python-Django:leap-16.0 into leap-16.0
pull from: mcalabkova/python-Django:leap-16.0
merge into: pool:leap-16.0
Conversation 6 Commits 1 Files Changed 3 +351
mcalabkova commented 2026-03-04 11:40:57 +01:00
Contributor
Copy Link
No description provided.
mcalabkova added 1 commit 2026-03-04 11:40:58 +01:00
Bug 1259142 (CVE-2026-25674) - VUL-0: CVE-2026-25674: python-Django: race condition can lead to potential incorrect permissions on newly created file system objects 2f50a96b4d
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-03-04 11:41:25 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-03-04 11:41:26 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-03-04 11:41:26 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-03-04 11:44:27 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-03-04 11:46:03 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
legaldb commented 2026-03-04 11:54:16 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (506135)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/508194): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (506135) ```
report.md
1.6 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-03-04 11:54:16 +01:00
eroca commented 2026-03-05 14:57:51 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
eroca commented 2026-03-05 14:57:52 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2026-03-05 15:06:17 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
This pull request can be merged automatically.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u leap-16.0:mcalabkova-leap-16.0
git checkout mcalabkova-leap-16.0
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
maintenance-release-review
legaldb
opensuse-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/python-Django#6
Delete Branch "mcalabkova/python-Django:leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?