qemu/iotests-add-test-for-backup-top-failure-.patch

From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:02 +0300
Subject: iotests: add test for backup-top failure on permission activation

Git-commit: a541fcc27c98b96da187c7d4573f3270f3ddd283

This test checks that bug is really fixed by previous commit.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org # v4.2.0
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20200121142802.21467-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>
---
 tests/qemu-iotests/283     | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/283.out |  8 ++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  1 +
 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/283 b/tests/qemu-iotests/283
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..293e557bd95f0553624fba89cd555614ff4a8c1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/283
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+#
+# Test for backup-top filter permission activation failure
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+#
+
+import iotests
+
+# The test is unrelated to formats, restrict it to qcow2 to avoid extra runs
+iotests.verify_image_format(supported_fmts=['qcow2'])
+
+size = 1024 * 1024
+
+""" Test description
+
+When performing a backup, all writes on the source subtree must go through the
+backup-top filter so it can copy all data to the target before it is changed.
+backup-top filter is appended above source node, to achieve this thing, so all
+parents of source node are handled. A configuration with side parents of source
+sub-tree with write permission is unsupported (we'd have append several
+backup-top filter like nodes to handle such parents). The test create an
+example of such configuration and checks that a backup is then not allowed
+(blockdev-backup command should fail).
+
+The configuration:
+
+    ┌────────┐  target  ┌─────────────┐
+    │ target │ ◀─────── │ backup_top  │
+    └────────┘          └─────────────┘
+                            │
+                            │ backing
+                            ▼
+                        ┌─────────────┐
+                        │   source    │
+                        └─────────────┘
+                            │
+                            │ file
+                            ▼
+                        ┌─────────────┐  write perm   ┌───────┐
+                        │    base     │ ◀──────────── │ other │
+                        └─────────────┘               └───────┘
+
+On activation (see .active field of backup-top state in block/backup-top.c),
+backup-top is going to unshare write permission on its source child. Write
+unsharing will be propagated to the "source->base" link and will conflict with
+other node write permission. So permission update will fail and backup job will
+not be started.
+
+Note, that the only thing which prevents backup of running on such
+configuration is default permission propagation scheme. It may be altered by
+different block drivers, so backup will run in invalid configuration. But
+something is better than nothing. Also, before the previous commit (commit
+preceding this test creation), starting backup on such configuration led to
+crash, so current "something" is a lot better, and this test actual goal is
+to check that crash is fixed :)
+"""
+
+vm = iotests.VM()
+vm.launch()
+
+vm.qmp_log('blockdev-add', **{'node-name': 'target', 'driver': 'null-co'})
+
+vm.qmp_log('blockdev-add', **{
+    'node-name': 'source',
+    'driver': 'blkdebug',
+    'image': {'node-name': 'base', 'driver': 'null-co', 'size': size}
+})
+
+vm.qmp_log('blockdev-add', **{
+    'node-name': 'other',
+    'driver': 'blkdebug',
+    'image': 'base',
+    'take-child-perms': ['write']
+})
+
+vm.qmp_log('blockdev-backup', sync='full', device='source', target='target')
+
+vm.shutdown()
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/283.out b/tests/qemu-iotests/283.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..daaf5828c18ee463671ec916989846f94c9f4b31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/283.out
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": {"driver": "null-co", "node-name": "target"}}
+{"return": {}}
+{"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": {"driver": "blkdebug", "image": {"driver": "null-co", "node-name": "base", "size": 1048576}, "node-name": "source"}}
+{"return": {}}
+{"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": {"driver": "blkdebug", "image": "base", "node-name": "other", "take-child-perms": ["write"]}}
+{"return": {}}
+{"execute": "blockdev-backup", "arguments": {"device": "source", "sync": "full", "target": "target"}}
+{"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Cannot set permissions for backup-top filter: Conflicts with use by other as 'image', which uses 'write' on base"}}
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/group b/tests/qemu-iotests/group
index 6b10a6a762143ec0d079b7fd6df2..1c1b69f0581c9a0043376b440600 100644
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/group
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group
@@ -286,3 +286,4 @@
 272 rw
 273 backing quick
 277 rw quick
+283 auto quick