diff --git a/ocf-pull-request-63.patch b/ocf-pull-request-63.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 4566fa8..0000000
--- a/ocf-pull-request-63.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-From 62a4f7561171328cd1d62cab394d0bba269ea7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com>
-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:32:45 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] OCF RA: Avoid promoting nodes with same start time as master
-
-It may happen that two nodes have the same start time, and one of these
-is the master. When this happens, the node actually gets the same score
-as the master and can get promoted. There's no reason to avoid being
-stable here, so let's keep the same master in that scenario.
----
- scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf | 5 +++++
- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-index 87bb7d4..da6aee6 100755
---- a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-+++ b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-@@ -1608,6 +1608,11 @@ get_monitor() {
-             ocf_log info "${LH} comparing us (start time: $our_start_time, score: $new_score) with $node (start time: $node_start_time, score: $node_score)"
-             if [ $node_start_time -ne 0 -a $node_score -ne 0 -a $node_start_time -lt $our_start_time ]; then
-                 new_score=$((node_score - 10 < new_score ? node_score - 10 : new_score ))
-+            elif [ $node_start_time -ne 0 -a $node_score -ne 0 -a $node_start_time -eq $our_start_time ]; then
-+                # Do not get promoted if the other node is already master and we have the same start time
-+                if is_master $node; then
-+                    new_score=$((node_score - 10 < new_score ? node_score - 10 : new_score ))
-+                fi
-             fi
-         done
-     fi
diff --git a/ocf-pull-request-64.patch b/ocf-pull-request-64.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index b91d774..0000000
--- a/ocf-pull-request-64.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-From a8e7a62513567b7beab895115d88f57257d21856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com>
-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:13:59 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 1/3] OCF RA: Fix test for no node in start notification
- handler
-
-If there's nothing starting and nothing active, then we do a -z " ",
-which doesn't have the same result as -z "". Instead, just test for
-emptiness for each set of nodes.
----
- scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-index 87bb7d4..8a82ac7 100755
---- a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-+++ b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-@@ -2185,7 +2185,7 @@ action_notify() {
-                 local nodes_list="${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname} ${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_active_uname}"
-                 # Do nothing, if the list of nodes being started or running reported empty
-                 # Delegate recovery, if needed, to the "running out of the cluster" monitor's logic
--                if [ -z "${nodes_list}" ] ; then
-+                if [ -z "${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname}" -a -z "${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_active_uname}" ] ; then
-                   ocf_log warn "${LH} I'm a last man standing and I must survive!"
-                   ocf_log info "${LH} post-start end."
-                   return $OCF_SUCCESS
-
-From 2f284bf595dbbe1938a1ce3028b0299b1a75a6cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com>
-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:15:24 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 2/3] OCF RA: Do not start rabbitmq if notification of start is
- not about us
-
-Right now, every time we get a start notification, all nodes will ensure
-the rabbitmq app is started. This makes little sense, as nodes that are
-already active don't need to do that.
-
-On top of that, this had the sideeffect of updating the start time for
-each of these nodes, which could result in the master moving to another
-node.
----
- scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf | 3 +--
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-index 8a82ac7..5d65061 100755
---- a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-+++ b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-@@ -2182,7 +2182,6 @@ action_notify() {
-                 ;;
-             start)
-                 ocf_log info "${LH} post-start begin."
--                local nodes_list="${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname} ${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_active_uname}"
-                 # Do nothing, if the list of nodes being started or running reported empty
-                 # Delegate recovery, if needed, to the "running out of the cluster" monitor's logic
-                 if [ -z "${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname}" -a -z "${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_active_uname}" ] ; then
-@@ -2191,7 +2190,7 @@ action_notify() {
-                   return $OCF_SUCCESS
-                 fi
-                 # check did this event from this host
--                my_host "${nodes_list}"
-+                my_host "${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname}"
-                 rc=$?
-                 # Do nothing, if there is no master reported
-                 # Delegate recovery, if needed, to the "running out of the cluster" monitor's logic
-
-From a6dc3f91b0c1038927567cbdce9f6a9538904075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com>
-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:17:38 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 3/3] OCF RA: Fix logging in start notification handler
-
-The "post-start end" log message was written too early (some things were
-still done afterwards), and not in all cases (it was inside a if
-statement).
----
- scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-index 5d65061..33f0f56 100755
---- a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-+++ b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-@@ -2217,7 +2217,6 @@ action_notify() {
-                       rc2=$?
-                       update_rabbit_start_time_if_rc $rc2
-                     fi
--                    ocf_log info "${LH} post-start end."
-                     if [ -s "${OCF_RESKEY_definitions_dump_file}" ] ; then
-                         ocf_log info "File ${OCF_RESKEY_definitions_dump_file} exists"
-                         ocf_run curl --silent --show-error --request POST --user $OCF_RESKEY_admin_user:$OCF_RESKEY_admin_password $OCF_RESKEY_host_ip:15672/api/definitions --header "Content-Type:application/json" --data @$OCF_RESKEY_definitions_dump_file
-@@ -2234,6 +2233,7 @@ action_notify() {
-                         return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC
-                     fi
-                 fi
-+                ocf_log info "${LH} post-start end."
-                 ;;
-             stop)
-                 # if rabbitmq-server stops on any another node, we should remove it from cluster (as ordinary operation)
diff --git a/ocf-pull-request-66.patch b/ocf-pull-request-66.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 15bcb35..0000000
--- a/ocf-pull-request-66.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-From 21d14dbe7389c2d0cc8778476ba5c71ad5ad4406 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com>
-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:34:31 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] OCF RA: Do not consider local failures as remote node
- problems
-
-In is_clustered_with(), commands that we run to check if the node is
-clustered with us, or partitioned with us may fail. When they fail, it
-actually doesn't tell us anything about the remote node.
-
-Until now, we were considering such failures as hints that the remote
-node is not in a sane state with us. But doing so has pretty negative
-impact, as it can cause rabbitmq to get restarted on the remote node,
-causing quite some disruption.
-
-So instead of doing this, ignore the error (it's still logged).
-
-There was a comment in the code wondering what is the best behavior;
-based on experience, I think preferring stability is the slightly more
-acceptable poison between the two options.
----
- scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf | 8 ++++----
- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-index 87bb7d4..bc6a538 100755
---- a/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-+++ b/scripts/rabbitmq-server-ha.ocf
-@@ -870,8 +870,8 @@ is_clustered_with()
-     rc=$?
-     if [ "$rc" -ne 0 ]; then
-         ocf_log err "${LH} Failed to check whether '$node_name' is considered running by us"
--        # XXX Or should we give remote node benefit of a doubt?
--        return 1
-+       # We had a transient local error; that doesn't mean the remote node is
-+       # not part of the cluster, so ignore this
-     elif [ "$seen_as_running" != true ]; then
-         ocf_log info "${LH} Node $node_name is not running, considering it not clustered with us"
-         return 1
-@@ -882,8 +882,8 @@ is_clustered_with()
-     rc=$?
-     if [ "$rc" -ne 0 ]; then
-         ocf_log err "${LH} Failed to check whether '$node_name' is partitioned with us"
--        # XXX Or should we give remote node benefit of a doubt?
--        return 1
-+       # We had a transient local error; that doesn't mean the remote node is
-+       # not partitioned with us, so ignore this
-     elif [ "$seen_as_partitioned" != false ]; then
-         ocf_log info "${LH} Node $node_name is partitioned from us"
-         return 1
diff --git a/rabbitmq-server-3.6.14.tar.xz b/rabbitmq-server-3.6.14.tar.xz
deleted file mode 100644
index 4be0566..0000000
--- a/rabbitmq-server-3.6.14.tar.xz
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:d76f49d92deec87876e142071f71d51592efa72e616335a80f22f9542d8db8b0
-size 1508216
diff --git a/rabbitmq-server-3.6.15.tar.xz b/rabbitmq-server-3.6.15.tar.xz
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4ecf6e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rabbitmq-server-3.6.15.tar.xz
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1e25f9aeb36aaae1a7d81f3cbf398e54c8eb5ad1876c0944ab12d6530c8db5fd
+size 3950180
diff --git a/rabbitmq-server.changes b/rabbitmq-server.changes
index 2af874d..2ec02a7 100644
--- a/rabbitmq-server.changes
+++ b/rabbitmq-server.changes
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Jan 22 19:19:19 UTC 2018 - vuntz@suse.com
+
+- Update to 3.6.15:
+  + Bug fixes:
+    - Avoid infinite loop when dropping entries in the GM.
+    - Various changes to the OCF scripts.
+  + Enhancements:
+    - Internal authN backend will now prohibit logins with a blank
+      passwords.
+  + Bug fixes in plugins.
+- Remove ocf-pull-request-63.patch, ocf-pull-request-64.patch,
+  ocf-pull-request-66.patch: merged upstream.
+
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Thu Jan 18 12:23:09 UTC 2018 - vuntz@suse.com
 
diff --git a/rabbitmq-server.spec b/rabbitmq-server.spec
index 78a525d..f8ce1b4 100644
--- a/rabbitmq-server.spec
+++ b/rabbitmq-server.spec
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 %define _make_args DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" PREFIX="%{_prefix}" RMQ_ROOTDIR=%{_rabbit_libdir} RMQ_ERLAPP_DIR=%{_rabbit_erllibdir} MAN_INSTALL_PATH="%{_mandir}" DOC_INSTALL_DIR=%{buildroot}/%{_docdir} VERSION=%{version} V=1
 
 Name:           rabbitmq-server
-Version:        3.6.14
+Version:        3.6.15
 Release:        0
 Summary:        The RabbitMQ Server
 License:        MPL-1.1
@@ -50,9 +50,6 @@ Source6:        rabbitmq-server.service
 Source7:        rabbitmq-server.tmpfiles.d.conf
 Source8:        README.SUSE
 Source9:        rabbitmq.config.example
-Patch0:         ocf-pull-request-63.patch
-Patch1:         ocf-pull-request-64.patch
-Patch2:         ocf-pull-request-66.patch
 BuildRequires:  erlang
 BuildRequires:  erlang-src
 BuildRequires:  fdupes
@@ -118,9 +115,6 @@ This package includes the RabbitMQ AMQP language bindings for Erlang.
 %prep
 %setup -q
 cp %{SOURCE8} .
-%patch0 -p1
-%patch1 -p1
-%patch2 -p1
 
 %build
 make all %{_make_args} %{?_smp_mflags}