factory #1
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: pool/ranger#1
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "sbradnick/pool.ranger:factory"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
See bsc#1254766 "ranger fails to start: uses broken shebang #!python -O"
- Update to version 1.9.4+git20250604.7e38143: * fixed bug with command info staying * Revert "fixed open_with bugginess" * fixed open_with bugginess * commands: Reword comment for brevity and accuracy * GHActions: Pass config_files rather than boolean to flake8 * commands: Disable invalid-name and too-many-lines pylints * Pylint: Disable invalid-name and too-many-lines for commands.py * add :unnarrow to disable :narrow mode * rifle: Update version - Use pyproject macros to build and install. - Cleaning up bad references to '#!python' for %{_bindir}/{ranger,rifle} - Seems to need 'BuildRequires: python-rpm-macros' for '%{python3_sitelib}' to function correctly - Update to version 1.9.4+git20250305.7ad50fa: * 7-zip now has an official Linux version (7zz) * add: support for tilde in bookmarks * img_display: address PR feedback * docs: kitty image previews are supported in other terminals now * img_display: auto-detect support for kitty image previews * rifle(terminals): support auto-detecting ghostty terminal emulator * Modified order of expantions in peview_script * Add GNOME papers to document viewers * Added ability to use environmental variables in preview_script option * doc: Regenerate man pages to have the proper version * Makefile: Update version Grep since adding logo to README * ranger/__init__: Caught another unbumped version OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1284973 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/utilities/ranger?expand=0&rev=43Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Legal reviewed as acceptable:
@opensuse-review : approve
LGTM
merge ok
oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
does not build, the _scmsync.obscpio should not be in the sources
This seems to happen from time to time and I'm not sure what the official solution is after looking through Slack history; something like
osc rremove utilities ranger _scmsync.obsinfoand push that toopenSUSE:Factory- then try to push it toleap-16.0again?Or maybe I can delete the file in gitea [in my fork] before opening the PR?
I thinnk this needs to stay on the factory side, but needs to be removed from the git side here.
Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
I've removed
_scmsync.obsinfofromsbradnick/pool.ranger:factoryand that looks like it's reflected here. Not sure if it'll be automatically picked up - but sincemsmeissn/PackageHub:maintenance-update-1766238635is closed, seem unlikely.Let me know if there's anything else I need to do (and thanks for the help thus far! 👍)
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Legal reviewed as acceptable:
rfrohl referenced this pull request from products/PackageHub2026-01-06 16:26:26 +01:00
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
@opensuse-review : approve
LGTM
merge ok
oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
rfrohl referenced this pull request from products/PackageHub2026-01-07 17:33:47 +01:00
still seeing build problems:
I've removed the problematic file, 🤞 3rd time's the charm.
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Legal reviewed as acceptable:
@opensuse-review : approve
LGTM
merge ok
oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
now builds fine
@maintenance-release-review: approve
merge ok
rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review