rpmlint/suse-check-optional-dependencies.diff
Dirk Mueller 1cdbc13b57 - update to 1.10:
* test: Skip fedoradev GPG checks at least for now
 * test: Refresh fedora* packages on image build
 * test: Use assertEqual where appropriate, thanks to flake8/hacking
 * test: Update fedora24 config to fedora26, run it on Travis
 * Add a new test for tmpfiles.d snippets in the /etc/ tree.
 * Add new tests for systemd units and udev rules in /etc/ tree
 * test: Disable hacking for now until it's flake8 3.4+ compatible
 * test: Set up flake8-bugbear, enable it in fedoradev container
 * rpmlint: Avoid unused loop control variable
 * ZipCheck: Add TODO
 * *: Avoid mutable argument defaults
 * Be aware of -debugsource packages
 * rpmdiff: Fix unused variable from previous commit
 * rpmdiff: Support soft dependencies
 * BinariesCheck, FilesCheck: Ignore various .build-id dirs
 * Add python3-devel and rpm-build to fedoradev container to provoke some issues
 * BinariesCheck: Popen env consistency fix
 * Pkg.getstatusoutput: Set LC_ALL for all Popens, defaulting to C
 * rpmlint: Fix checking specfile from stdin
 * test.sh: Extract rpmlint command to run_rpmlint
 * Revert "Remove unused spec_lines check_spec argument"
 * BinariesCheck: Trivial cleanups
 * travis: Run make install too
 * FilesCheck: Allow multiple bytecode magic values per Python version
 * tests: Make output test tools easier to reuse
 * FilesCheck: hg.python.org -> github.com/python
 * Pkg: Return vendor and distribution as unicode strings
 * FilesCheck: Add Python 3.7 bytecode magic value
 * Pkg.b2s: Add some more test cases

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:openSUSE:Factory:rpmlint/rpmlint?expand=0&rev=482
2017-09-28 11:35:09 +00:00

56 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff

From: Some One <nobody@opensuse.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:55:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] suse-check-optional-dependencies.diff
===================================================================
---
FilesCheck.py | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
Index: rpmlint-rpmlint-1.10/FilesCheck.py
===================================================================
--- rpmlint-rpmlint-1.10.orig/FilesCheck.py
+++ rpmlint-rpmlint-1.10/FilesCheck.py
@@ -535,6 +535,16 @@ class FilesCheck(AbstractCheck.AbstractC
if res.group(1) != pkg.name:
printError(pkg, 'incoherent-logrotate-file', f)
+ deps=[x[0] for x in pkg.requires()+pkg.recommends()+pkg.suggests()]
+ if res and not ('logrotate' in deps) and pkg.name != "logrotate":
+ printError(pkg, 'missing-dependency-to-logrotate', "for logrotate script", f)
+ if f.startswith('/etc/cron.') \
+ and not ('cron' in deps) and pkg.name != "cron":
+ printError(pkg, 'missing-dependency-to-cron', "for cron script", f)
+ if f.startswith('/etc/xinet.d/') \
+ and not ('xinetd' in deps) and pkg.name != "xinetd":
+ printError(pkg, 'missing-dependency-to-xinetd', "for xinet.d script", f)
+
if link != '':
ext = compr_regex.search(link)
if ext:
@@ -1338,6 +1348,24 @@ consequences), or other compiler flags w
extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not
unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.''',
+'missing-dependency-to-cron',
+'''This package installs a file in /etc/cron.*/ but
+doesn't require cron to be installed. as cron is not part of the essential packages,
+your package should explicitely require cron to make sure that your cron job is
+executed. If it is an optional feature of your package, recommend or suggest cron.''',
+
+'missing-dependency-to-logrotate',
+'''This package installs a file in /etc/logrotate.d/ but
+doesn't require logrotate to be installed. Because logrotate is not part of the essential packages,
+your package should explicitely depend on logrotate to make sure that your logrotate
+job is executed. If it is an optional feature of your package, recommend or suggest logrotate.''',
+
+'missing-dependency-to-xinetd',
+'''This package installs a file in /etc/xinetd.d/ but
+doesn't require xinetd to be installed. Because xinetd is not part of the essential packages,
+your package should explicitely depend on logrotate to make sure that your xinetd
+job is executed. If it is an optional feature of your package, recommend or suggest xinetd.''',
+
'read-error',
'''This file could not be read. A reason for this could be that the info about
it in the rpm header indicates that it is supposed to be a readable normal file