systemd/0001-journal-letting-interleaved-seqnums-go.patch
Frederic Crozat 4574d97ac0 Accepting request 179368 from home:elvigia:branches:Base:System
- 0001-journal-letting-interleaved-seqnums-go.patch and 
 0002-journal-remember-last-direction-of-search-and-keep-o.patch
 fix possible infinite loops in the journal code, related to
 bnc #817778

- 0001-journal-letting-interleaved-seqnums-go.patch and 
 0002-journal-remember-last-direction-of-search-and-keep-o.patch
 fix possible infinite loops in the journal code, related to
 bnc #817778 (forwarded request 179367 from elvigia)

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/179368
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/systemd?expand=0&rev=396
2013-06-18 07:18:53 +00:00

75 lines
3.0 KiB
Diff

From 53113dc8254cae9a27e321e539d2d876677e61b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 22:01:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] journal: letting (interleaved) seqnums go
In the following scenario:
server creates system.journal
server creates user-1000.journal
both journals share the same seqnum_id.
Then
server writes to user-1000.journal first,
and server writes to system.journal a bit later,
and everything is fine.
The server then terminates (crash, reboot, rsyslog testing,
whatever), and user-1000.journal has entries which end with
a lower seqnum than system.journal. Now
server is restarted
server opens user-1000.journal and writes entries to it...
BAM! duplicate seqnums for the same seqnum_id.
Now, we usually don't see that happen, because system.journal
is closed last, and opened first. Since usually at least one
message is written during boot and lands in the system.journal,
the seqnum is initialized from it, and is set to a number higher
than than anything found in user journals. Nevertheless, if
system.journal is corrupted and is rotated, it can happen that
an entry is written to the user journal with a seqnum that is
a duplicate with an entry found in the corrupted system.journal~.
When browsing the journal, journalctl can fall into a loop
where it tries to follow the seqnums, and tries to go the
next location by seqnum, and is transported back in time to
to the older duplicate seqnum. There is not way to find
out the maximum seqnum used in a multiple files, without
actually looking at all of them. But we don't want to do
that because it would be slow, and actually it isn't really
possible, because a file might e.g. be temporarily unaccessible.
Fix the problem by using different seqnum series for user
journals. Using the same seqnum series for rotated journals
is still fine, because we know that nothing will write
to the rotated journal anymore.
Likely related:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64566
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/35581
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817778
Possibly related:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64293
Conflicts:
src/journal/journald-server.c
---
src/journal/journald-server.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/journald-server.c b/src/journal/journald-server.c
index cc52b8a..cde63c8 100644
--- a/src/journal/journald-server.c
+++ b/src/journal/journald-server.c
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static JournalFile* find_journal(Server *s, uid_t uid) {
journal_file_close(f);
}
- r = journal_file_open_reliably(p, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0640, s->compress, s->seal, &s->system_metrics, s->mmap, s->system_journal, &f);
+ r = journal_file_open_reliably(p, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0640, s->compress, s->seal, &s->system_metrics, s->mmap, NULL, &f);
free(p);
if (r < 0)
--
1.8.2.1