Add package in leap-16.0 #1

Open
eroca wants to merge 1 commits from new-in-leap-16.0 into leap-16.0
Owner

This empty PR enables the review process. Please review the full sources from the newly created branch.

This empty PR enables the review process. Please review the full sources from the newly created branch.
eroca added 1 commit 2026-01-23 10:50:07 +01:00
eroca added 1 commit 2026-01-23 10:50:07 +01:00
eroca requested review from legaldb 2026-01-23 10:50:08 +01:00
Member

Legal review in progress.

Legal review [in progress](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/500620).
3.7 KiB
Member

Legal reviewed by dec16180 as unacceptable:

contains non-commercial license
Legal reviewed by *dec16180* as [unacceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/500620): ``` contains non-commercial license ```
3.7 KiB
legaldb requested changes 2026-01-26 17:44:38 +01:00
legaldb left a comment
Member

Changes requested based on legal review.

Changes requested based on legal review.
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-01-26 17:45:04 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-01-26 17:45:04 +01:00
First-time contributor

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
First-time contributor

@jengelh: any idea if there is an alternative for the current license ? Otherwise I think this will not work out.

[@jengelh](https://src.opensuse.org/jengelh): any idea if there is an alternative for the current license ? Otherwise I think this will not work out.
First-time contributor

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
First-time contributor

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2026-01-27 18:05:36 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
This pull request can be merged automatically.
The changes on this branch are already on the target branch. This will be an empty commit.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin new-in-leap-16.0:new-in-leap-16.0
git checkout new-in-leap-16.0
Sign in to join this conversation.