xorg-x11-server/U_CVE-2025-26598-0001-Xi-Fix-barrier-device-search.patch

113 lines
3.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

- U_CVE-2025-26594-0001-Cursor-Refuse-to-free-the-root-cursor.patch U_CVE-2025-26594-0002-dix-keep-a-ref-to-the-rootCursor.patch * Use-after-free of the root cursor (CVE-2025-26594, bsc#1237427) - U_CVE-2025-26595-0001-xkb-Fix-buffer-overflow-in-XkbVModMaskText.patch * Buffer overflow in XkbVModMaskText() (CVE-2025-26595, bsc#1237429) - U_CVE-2025-26596-0001-xkb-Fix-computation-of-XkbSizeKeySyms.patch * Heap overflow in XkbWriteKeySyms() (CVE-2025-26596, bsc#1237430) - U_CVE-2025-26597-0001-xkb-Fix-buffer-overflow-in-XkbChangeTypesOfKey.patch * Buffer overflow in XkbChangeTypesOfKey() (CVE-2025-26597, bsc#1237431) - U_CVE-2025-26598-0001-Xi-Fix-barrier-device-search.patch * Out-of-bounds write in CreatePointerBarrierClient() (CVE-2025-26598, bsc#1237432) - U_CVE-2025-26599-0001-composite-Handle-failure-to-redirect-in-compRedirect.patch U_CVE-2025-26599-0002-composite-initialize-border-clip-even-when-pixmap-al.patch * Use of uninitialized pointer in compRedirectWindow() (CVE-2025-26599, bsc#1237433) - U_CVE-2025-26600-0001-dix-Dequeue-pending-events-on-frozen-device-on-remov.patch * Use-after-free in PlayReleasedEvents() (CVE-2025-26600, bsc#1237434) - U_CVE-2025-26601-0001-sync-Do-not-let-sync-objects-uninitialized.patch U_CVE-2025-26601-0002-sync-Check-values-before-applying-changes.patch U_CVE-2025-26601-0003-sync-Do-not-fail-SyncAddTriggerToSyncObject.patch U_CVE-2025-26601-0004-sync-Apply-changes-last-in-SyncChangeAlarmAttributes.patch * Use-after-free in SyncInitTrigger() (CVE-2025-26601, bsc#1237435) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/X11:XOrg/xorg-x11-server?expand=0&rev=907
2025-02-25 18:04:55 +00:00
From 0f5ea9d269ac6225bcb302a1ec0f58878114da9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:25:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH xserver] Xi: Fix barrier device search
The function GetBarrierDevice() would search for the pointer device
based on its device id and return the matching value, or supposedly NULL
if no match was found.
Unfortunately, as written, it would return the last element of the list
if no matching device id was found which can lead to out of bounds
memory access.
Fix the search function to return NULL if not matching device is found,
and adjust the callers to handle the case where the device cannot be
found.
CVE-2025-26598, ZDI-CAN-25740
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
---
Xi/xibarriers.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: xwayland-22.1.5/Xi/xibarriers.c
===================================================================
--- xwayland-22.1.5.orig/Xi/xibarriers.c
+++ xwayland-22.1.5/Xi/xibarriers.c
@@ -129,14 +129,15 @@ static void FreePointerBarrierClient(str
static struct PointerBarrierDevice *GetBarrierDevice(struct PointerBarrierClient *c, int deviceid)
{
- struct PointerBarrierDevice *pbd = NULL;
+ struct PointerBarrierDevice *p, *pbd = NULL;
- xorg_list_for_each_entry(pbd, &c->per_device, entry) {
- if (pbd->deviceid == deviceid)
+ xorg_list_for_each_entry(p, &c->per_device, entry) {
+ if (p->deviceid == deviceid) {
+ pbd = p;
break;
+ }
}
- BUG_WARN(!pbd);
return pbd;
}
@@ -337,6 +338,9 @@ barrier_find_nearest(BarrierScreenPtr cs
double distance;
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(c, dev->id);
+ if (!pbd)
+ continue;
+
if (pbd->seen)
continue;
@@ -445,6 +449,9 @@ input_constrain_cursor(DeviceIntPtr dev,
nearest = &c->barrier;
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(c, master->id);
+ if (!pbd)
+ continue;
+
new_sequence = !pbd->hit;
pbd->seen = TRUE;
@@ -485,6 +492,9 @@ input_constrain_cursor(DeviceIntPtr dev,
int flags = 0;
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(c, master->id);
+ if (!pbd)
+ continue;
+
pbd->seen = FALSE;
if (!pbd->hit)
continue;
@@ -679,6 +689,9 @@ BarrierFreeBarrier(void *data, XID id)
continue;
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(c, dev->id);
+ if (!pbd)
+ continue;
+
if (!pbd->hit)
continue;
@@ -738,6 +751,8 @@ static void remove_master_func(void *res
barrier = container_of(b, struct PointerBarrierClient, barrier);
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(barrier, *deviceid);
+ if (!pbd)
+ return;
if (pbd->hit) {
BarrierEvent ev = {
@@ -903,6 +918,10 @@ ProcXIBarrierReleasePointer(ClientPtr cl
barrier = container_of(b, struct PointerBarrierClient, barrier);
pbd = GetBarrierDevice(barrier, dev->id);
+ if (!pbd) {
+ client->errorValue = dev->id;
+ return BadDevice;
+ }
if (pbd->barrier_event_id == event_id)
pbd->release_event_id = event_id;