Adding missing dependencies for pull-request#46 (python-pygraphviz) #60
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch ":leap-16.0"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This is a forwarded pull request by AutoGits PR Review Bot
referencing the following pull request(s):
ManualMergeProject enabled. To merge, 'merge ok' is required by project maintainer in the project PR.
Adding missing dependencies for pull-request#46 (python-pygraphviz)to Forwarded PRs:No package changes. Not rebuilding project by default
No package changes. Not rebuilding project by default
@@ -15737,0 +15737,4 @@[submodule "python-accessible-pygments"]path = python-accessible-pygmentsurl = ../../pool/python-accessible-pygmentsbranch = leap-16.0This branch was missing in pool. Created it.
@@ -16361,0 +16365,4 @@[submodule "python-numpydoc"]path = python-numpydocurl = ../../pool/python-numpydocbarnch = leap-16.0This branch was missing in pool. Created it.
@@ -16573,0 +16581,4 @@[submodule "python-pydata-sphinx-theme"]path = python-pydata-sphinx-themeurl = ../../pool/python-pydata-sphinx-themebranch = leap-16.0This branch was missing in pool. Created it.
@@ -17009,0 +17021,4 @@[submodule "python-sphinx-gallery"]path = python-sphinx-galleryurl = ../../pool/python-sphinx-gallerybranch = leap-16.0This branch was missing in pool. Created it.
@@ -17007,2 +17019,4 @@url = ../../pool/python-sphinx-clickbranch = leap-16.0[submodule "python-sphinx-gallery"]path = python-sphinx-gallery@bigironman Looks like this line has a double indent.
@@ -17013,0 +17029,4 @@[submodule "python-sphinx-theme-builder"]path = python-sphinx-theme-builderurl = ../../pool/python-sphinx-theme-builderbranch = leap-16.0This branch was missing in pool. Created it.
@bigironman Please fix the double-indent.
Forwarded PRs:to Adding missing dependencies for pull-request#46 (python-pygraphviz)Ah, this got merged in the meantime, so I went ahead and fixed the double-indent myself. See #61