products/PackageHub
SHA256
31
1
Fork 14
Code Issues Pull Requests 52 Actions Activity

.gitmodules: add cobbler (bsc#1243917) #87

Closed
smithfarm wants to merge 1 commits from smithfarm/PackageHub:wip-cobbler into leap-16.0
pull from: smithfarm/PackageHub:wip-cobbler
merge into: products:leap-16.0
Conversation 8 Commits 1 Files Changed 2 +5
smithfarm commented 2025-09-05 12:14:03 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Cobbler was in Package Hub 16.0 before the git transition, but
was not building successfully. Let's try it again.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler ncutler@suse.cz

Cobbler was in Package Hub 16.0 before the git transition, but was not building successfully. Let's try it again. Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>
smithfarm added 1 commit 2025-09-05 12:14:04 +02:00
.gitmodules: add cobbler (bsc#1243917)
Some checks failed
ObsStaging OBS Staging build
Details
7df157eb4f 
Cobbler was in Package Hub 16.0 before the git transition, but
was not building successfully. Let's try it again.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from autogits_obs_staging_bot 2025-09-05 12:14:05 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from bigironman 2025-09-05 12:14:06 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from lkocman-factory 2025-09-05 12:14:06 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maxlin_factory 2025-09-05 12:14:06 +02:00
autogits_obs_staging_bot commented 2025-09-05 12:15:49 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Build is started in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:87 .

Build is started in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:87 .
mlin7442 commented 2025-09-05 12:18:35 +02:00
Contributor
Copy Link

it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully..

it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully..
smithfarm commented 2025-09-05 12:22:49 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully..

I agree. But I found - from https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249107#c4 - that a cobbler 3.3.8 is on the way which will address the build failure.

Would it be OK with you to keep this open while we wait for 3.3.8?

> it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully.. I agree. But I found - from https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249107#c4 - that a cobbler 3.3.8 is on the way which will address the build failure. Would it be OK with you to keep this open while we wait for 3.3.8?
mlin7442 commented 2025-09-05 12:25:22 +02:00
Contributor
Copy Link

it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully..

I agree. But I found - from https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249107#c4 - that a cobbler 3.3.8 is on the way which will address the build failure.

Would it be OK with you to keep this open while we wait for 3.3.8?

Of course.

> > it's build failed in Factory also, I'd very surprised if it suddenly build successfully.. > > I agree. But I found - from https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249107#c4 - that a cobbler 3.3.8 is on the way which will address the build failure. > > Would it be OK with you to keep this open while we wait for 3.3.8? Of course.
autogits_obs_staging_bot requested changes 2025-09-10 05:16:06 +02:00
Dismissed
autogits_obs_staging_bot left a comment
Member
Copy Link

Cannot fetch reference project meta

Cannot fetch reference project meta
adrianSuSE requested review from autogits_obs_staging_bot 2025-09-10 12:42:08 +02:00
autogits_obs_staging_bot requested changes 2025-09-10 14:29:59 +02:00
autogits_obs_staging_bot left a comment
Member
Copy Link

Unable to setup stage project openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0

Unable to setup stage project openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0
eroca requested review from packagehub-review 2025-09-26 16:21:41 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-09-26 16:21:55 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
eroca closed this pull request 2025-09-26 16:22:10 +02:00
eroca reopened this pull request 2025-09-26 16:22:13 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from autobuild-review 2025-09-26 16:22:16 +02:00
autobuild-review commented 2025-09-26 16:26:31 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by autobuild-review represents a group of reviewers: atartamo, dmach, jdsn, mstrigl, darix, oertel, bigironman, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @autobuild-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @autobuild-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by autobuild-review represents a group of reviewers: atartamo, dmach, jdsn, mstrigl, darix, oertel, bigironman, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@autobuild-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@autobuild-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
eroca removed review request for autobuild-review 2025-09-26 17:00:19 +02:00
smithfarm closed this pull request 2025-11-04 11:52:16 +01:00
Some checks failed
ObsStaging OBS Staging build
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
bigironman
lkocman-factory
maxlin_factory
autogits_obs_staging_bot
packagehub-review
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
abergmann adrianSuSE atartamo autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_obs_staging_bot autogits_workflow_pr_bot bfilho bigironman darix dmach eroca factory_bot gitea-actions-autobuild gsonnu jdsn legaldb lkocman-factory maintenance-release-review maxlin_factory mbozicevic mimi_vx mschnitzer msmeissn mstrigl oertel opensuse-review packagehub-review pluskalm qam-openqa-review rfrohl smithfarm szarate
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: products/PackageHub#87
Delete Branch "smithfarm/PackageHub:wip-cobbler"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?