Pull request for security update for python-django #177
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "rfrohl/PackageHub:maintenance-update-1760613179"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
PR: pool/python-Django!2
Review by qam-openqa-review represents a group of reviewers: mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, openqa-maintenance, szarate .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@qam-openqa-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@qam-openqa-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
@maintenance-release-review: approve
merge ok
Build is started in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:177 .
msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Build successful
openQA tests triggered: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/overview?build=%3Aproducts_PackageHub%3A177%3Apython-Django&distri=opensuse&version=16.0
@rfrohl for some reason the version in the patch is lower than the version available already for leap:
version available in Leap is python313-Django-5.2.4-bp160.2.1
@opensuse-review : approve
LGTM
merge ok
oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
@msmeissn is that addressed now or is the fix for this problem still open ?
edit: triggered a rebuild, lets see.
Does not look to good, still only bp160.1.2.
Build is started in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:177 .
Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, slemke .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@maintenance-release-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@opensuse-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
@maintenance-release-review: approve
merge ok
Review by qam-openqa-review represents a group of reviewers: mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, openqa-maintenance, foursixnine-openqa, szarate .
Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@qam-openqa-review: approve.To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment:
@qam-openqa-review: declinefollowed with lines justifying the decision.Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
Build successful
openQA tests triggered: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/overview?build=%3Aproducts_PackageHub%3A177%3Apython-Django&distri=opensuse&version=16.0
@opensuse-review : approve
LGTM
merge ok
oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
openQA tests passed: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/overview?build=%3Aproducts_PackageHub%3A177%3Apython-Django&distri=opensuse&version=16.0
@qam-openqa-review: approve
szarate approved a review on behalf of qam-openqa-review