forked from pool/python-checkdmarc
- Update to 5.3.1:
* Ignore UnicodeDecodeError exceptions when querying for TXT records
* Check DNSSEC on MX hostnames
* USE DNSSEC when requesting DNSKEY records
* Do not require an RRSIG answer when querying for DNSKEY records
* Pass in nameservers and timeout when running get_dnskey recursively
* Properly cache DNSKEY answers
* Fix exception handling for query_mta_sts_record
* Check for TLSA records
* Add support for parsing SMTP TLS Reporting (RFC8460) DNS records
* Add missing import dns.dnssec
* Always use the actual subdomain or domain provided
* Include MTA-STS and BIMI results in CSV output
* Added the include_tag_descriptions parameter to
checkdmarc.bimi.check_bimi()
* Added the exception class MTASTSPolicyDownloadError
* Major refactoring: Change from a single module to a package of modules,
with each checked standard as its own package
* Add support for MTA-STS RFC 8461
* Add support for BIMI
* Specify a BIMI selector using the --bimi-selector/-b option
* Fix SPF query error and warning messages
* Add support for null MX records - RFC 7505
* Make DMARC retorting URI error messages more clear
* Fix compatibility with Python 3.8
* SPFRecordNotFound exception now includes a domain argument
* The DMARC missing authorization error message now includes the full
expected DNS record
* Properly parse DMARC and BIMI records for domains that do not have an
identified base domain
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:python/python-checkdmarc?expand=0&rev=5
This commit is contained in:
157
tests.py
157
tests.py
@@ -1,6 +1,16 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
|
||||
"""Automated tests"""
|
||||
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from collections import OrderedDict
|
||||
|
||||
import checkdmarc
|
||||
import checkdmarc.utils
|
||||
import checkdmarc.spf
|
||||
import checkdmarc.dmarc
|
||||
import checkdmarc.dnssec
|
||||
|
||||
known_good_domains = [
|
||||
"fbi.gov",
|
||||
@@ -34,12 +44,53 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"Known good domain {0} failed DMARC check:"
|
||||
"\n\n{1}".format(result["domain"], dmarc_error))
|
||||
|
||||
def testDMARCMixedFormatting(self):
|
||||
"""DMARC records with extra spaces and mixed case are still valid"""
|
||||
examples = [
|
||||
"v=DMARC1;p=ReJect",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1;p=reject;",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1\t;\tp=reject\t;",
|
||||
"v = DMARC1\t;\tp\t\t\t=\t\t\treject\t;",
|
||||
"V=DMARC1;p=reject;"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for example in examples:
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record(example, "")
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(parsed_record, OrderedDict)
|
||||
|
||||
def testGetBaseDomain(self):
|
||||
subdomain = "foo.example.com"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "example.com"
|
||||
|
||||
# Test reserved domains
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.example"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.example"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.test"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.test"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.invalid"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.invalid"
|
||||
|
||||
subdomain = "_dmarc.nonauth-rua.invalid.localhost"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "invalid.localhost"
|
||||
|
||||
# Test newer PSL entries
|
||||
subdomain = "e3191.c.akamaiedge.net"
|
||||
result = checkdmarc.utils.get_base_domain(subdomain)
|
||||
assert result == "c.akamaiedge.net"
|
||||
|
||||
def testUppercaseSPFMechanism(self):
|
||||
"""Treat uppercase SPF"SPF mechanisms as valid"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 IP4:147.75.8.208 -ALL"
|
||||
domain = "example.no"
|
||||
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(results["warnings"]), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +99,7 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
rec = '"v=spf1 ip4:147.75.8.208 " "include:_spf.salesforce.com -all"'
|
||||
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.parse_spf_record(rec, "example.com")
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(rec, "example.com")
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed_record["parsed"]["all"], "fail")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -57,12 +108,13 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
rec = "v=spf1 ip4:213.5.39.110 -all MS=83859DAEBD1978F9A7A67D3"
|
||||
domain = "avd.dk"
|
||||
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.parse_spf_record(rec, domain)
|
||||
parsed_record = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(rec, domain)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(parsed_record["warnings"]), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
@unittest.skip
|
||||
def testDNSSEC(self):
|
||||
"""Test known good DNSSEC"""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(checkdmarc.test_dnssec("whalensolutions.com"), True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(checkdmarc.dnssec.test_dnssec("fbi.gov"), True)
|
||||
|
||||
def testIncludeMissingSPF(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records that include domains that are missing SPF records
|
||||
@@ -74,8 +126,8 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
'include:mail2.dialogportal.com a:mailrelay.jppol.dk ' \
|
||||
'a:sendmail.jppol.dk ?all"'
|
||||
domain = "ekstrabladet.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFRecordNotFound,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFRecordNotFound,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testTooManySPFDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 10 SPF mechanisms that cause DNS lookups raise
|
||||
@@ -89,8 +141,19 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"include:_spf.google.com " \
|
||||
"~all"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFTooManyDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFTooManyDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testTooManySPFVoidDNSLookups(self):
|
||||
"""SPF records with > 2 void DNS lookups"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 a:13Mk4olS9VWhQqXRl90fKJrD.example.com " \
|
||||
"mx:SfGiqBnQfRbOMapQJhozxo2B.example.com " \
|
||||
"a:VAFeyU9N2KJX518aGsN3w6VS.example.com " \
|
||||
"~all"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFTooManyVoidDNSLookups,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFSyntaxErrors(self):
|
||||
"""SPF record syntax errors raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
@@ -98,8 +161,8 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 mx a:mail.cohaesio.net ' \
|
||||
'include: trustpilotservice.com ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "2021.ai"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
@@ -107,56 +170,70 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"+ip4:78.46.224.83 " \
|
||||
"+ip4:relay.mailchannels.net +ip4:138.201.60.20 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6inIPv4(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip4:1200:0000:AB00:1234:0000:2552:7777:1313 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4Range(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv4 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip4:78.46.96.236/99 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip6:1200:0000:AB00:1234:O000:2552:7777:1313 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv4inIPv6(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
spf_record = "v=spf1 ip6:78.46.96.236 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFInvalidIPv6Range(self):
|
||||
"""Invalid ipv6 SPF mechanism values raise SPFSyntaxError"""
|
||||
record = "v=spf1 ip6:1200:0000:AB00:1234:0000:2552:7777:1313/130 ~all"
|
||||
domain = "surftown.dk"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFSyntaxError,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFIncludeLoop(self):
|
||||
"""SPF record with include loop raises SPFIncludeLoop"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 include:example.com"'
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.SPFIncludeLoop,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.spf.SPFIncludeLoop,
|
||||
checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record, spf_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFMissingMXRecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if a SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no MX records"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 mx ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "seanthegeek.net"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("{0} does not have any MX records".format(domain),
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
def testSPFMissingARecord(self):
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if a SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
"""A warning is issued if an SPF record contains a mx mechanism
|
||||
pointing to a domain that has no A records"""
|
||||
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 include:_spf.bibsyst.no a mx ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "sogne.folkebibl.no"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("sogne.folkebibl.no does not have any A/AAAA records",
|
||||
spf_record = '"v=spf1 a ~all"'
|
||||
domain = "cardinalhealth.net"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.spf.parse_spf_record(spf_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("cardinalhealth.net does not have any A/AAAA records",
|
||||
results["warnings"])
|
||||
|
||||
def testDMARCPctLessThan100Warning(self):
|
||||
@@ -167,7 +244,7 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"rua=mailto:eits.dmarcrua@energy.gov; " \
|
||||
"ruf=mailto:eits.dmarcruf@energy.gov"
|
||||
domain = "energy.gov"
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.parse_dmarc_record(dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
results = checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record(dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertIn("pct value is less than 100",
|
||||
results["warnings"][0])
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -177,34 +254,26 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov," \
|
||||
"mailto:dmarcreports@usdoj.gov"
|
||||
domain = "dea.gov"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=__" \
|
||||
"mailto:reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov," \
|
||||
"mailto:dmarcreports@usdoj.gov"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCReportURI,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testInvalidDMARCPolicyValue(self):
|
||||
"""An invalid DMARC policy value raises InvalidDMARCTagValue """
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1; p=foo; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com"
|
||||
domain = "example.com"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.InvalidDMARCTagValue,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_dmarc_record,
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.dmarc.InvalidDMARCTagValue,
|
||||
checkdmarc.dmarc.parse_dmarc_record,
|
||||
dmarc_record,
|
||||
domain)
|
||||
|
||||
def testInvalidDMARCfo(self):
|
||||
"""An invalid DMARC fo tag value raises InvalidDMARCTagValue"""
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc_record = "v=DMARC1;p=none;aspf=s;adkim=s;fo=0:1:d:s;" \
|
||||
"ruf=mailto:dmarcreports@omb.gov;" \
|
||||
"rua=mailto:dmarcreports@omb.gov"
|
||||
domain = "omb.gov"
|
||||
self.assertRaises(checkdmarc.InvalidDMARCTagValue,
|
||||
checkdmarc.parse_dmarc_record, dmarc_record, domain)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main(verbosity=2)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user