From 8aa13eec80eac312e4b99423909387660fb99b8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Olivier Langlois Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 23:18:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] aplay: fix pcm_read() return value Because of the way the pcm_read() functions are currently used, returning rcount or result is equivalent but I feel it is more accurate to return 'result'. Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- aplay/aplay.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/aplay/aplay.c b/aplay/aplay.c index e0631c4aa752..69e8bdab63b7 100644 --- a/aplay/aplay.c +++ b/aplay/aplay.c @@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ static ssize_t pcm_read(u_char *data, size_t rcount) data += r * bits_per_frame / 8; } } - return rcount; + return result; } static ssize_t pcm_readv(u_char **data, unsigned int channels, size_t rcount) @@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ static ssize_t pcm_readv(u_char **data, unsigned int channels, size_t rcount) count -= r; } } - return rcount; + return result; } /* -- 1.8.4.5