Accepting request 1179914 from network
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1179914 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/frr?expand=0&rev=32
This commit is contained in:
commit
234fd30855
67
0021-ospfd-Solved-crash-in-RI-parsing-with-OSPF-TE.patch
Normal file
67
0021-ospfd-Solved-crash-in-RI-parsing-with-OSPF-TE.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
From 298704f1e73221172432e2a4afd79086ffcd4cca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:28:23 +0200
|
||||
Upstream: yes
|
||||
References: CVE-2024-31950,bsc#1222526,gh#FRRouting/frr#16088
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ospfd: Solved crash in RI parsing with OSPF TE
|
||||
|
||||
Iggy Frankovic discovered another ospfd crash when performing fuzzing of OSPF
|
||||
LSA packets. The crash occurs in ospf_te_parse_ri() function when attemping to
|
||||
read Segment Routing subTLVs. The original code doesn't check if the size of
|
||||
the SR subTLVs have the correct length. In presence of erronous LSA, this will
|
||||
cause a buffer overflow and ospfd crash.
|
||||
|
||||
This patch introduces new verification of the subTLVs size for Router
|
||||
Information TLV.
|
||||
|
||||
Co-authored-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyfran@amazon.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit f69d1313b19047d3d83fc2b36a518355b861dfc4)
|
||||
---
|
||||
ospfd/ospf_te.c | 9 +++++++++
|
||||
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_te.c b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
index 45eb205759..885b915585 100644
|
||||
--- a/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
@@ -2483,6 +2483,9 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ri(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ntohs(tlvh->type)) {
|
||||
case RI_SR_TLV_SR_ALGORITHM:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) < 1 ||
|
||||
+ TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) > ALGORITHM_COUNT)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
algo = (struct ri_sr_tlv_sr_algorithm *)tlvh;
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < ntohs(algo->header.length); i++) {
|
||||
@@ -2507,6 +2510,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ri(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RI_SR_TLV_SRGB_LABEL_RANGE:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) != RI_SR_TLV_LABEL_RANGE_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
range = (struct ri_sr_tlv_sid_label_range *)tlvh;
|
||||
size = GET_RANGE_SIZE(ntohl(range->size));
|
||||
lower = GET_LABEL(ntohl(range->lower.value));
|
||||
@@ -2524,6 +2529,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ri(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RI_SR_TLV_SRLB_LABEL_RANGE:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) != RI_SR_TLV_LABEL_RANGE_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
range = (struct ri_sr_tlv_sid_label_range *)tlvh;
|
||||
size = GET_RANGE_SIZE(ntohl(range->size));
|
||||
lower = GET_LABEL(ntohl(range->lower.value));
|
||||
@@ -2541,6 +2548,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ri(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RI_SR_TLV_NODE_MSD:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) < RI_SR_TLV_NODE_MSD_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
msd = (struct ri_sr_tlv_node_msd *)tlvh;
|
||||
if ((CHECK_FLAG(node->flags, LS_NODE_MSD))
|
||||
&& (node->msd == msd->value))
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.35.3
|
||||
|
109
0022-ospfd-Correct-Opaque-LSA-Extended-parser.patch
Normal file
109
0022-ospfd-Correct-Opaque-LSA-Extended-parser.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
||||
From 4e70b09f24b72fbb27ff5eda63393bfd2a72ef37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:57:11 +0200
|
||||
Upstream: yes
|
||||
References: CVE-2024-31951,bsc#1222528,gh#FRRouting/frr#16088
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ospfd: Correct Opaque LSA Extended parser
|
||||
|
||||
Iggy Frankovic discovered another ospfd crash when performing fuzzing of OSPF
|
||||
LSA packets. The crash occurs in ospf_te_parse_ext_link() function when
|
||||
attemping to read Segment Routing Adjacency SID subTLVs. The original code
|
||||
doesn't check if the size of the Extended Link TLVs and subTLVs have the correct
|
||||
length. In presence of erronous LSA, this will cause a buffer overflow and ospfd
|
||||
crashes.
|
||||
|
||||
This patch introduces new verification of the subTLVs size for Extended Link
|
||||
TLVs and subTLVs. Similar check has been also introduced for the Extended
|
||||
Prefix TLV.
|
||||
|
||||
Co-authored-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyfran@amazon.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 5557a289acdaeec8cc63ffc97b5c2abf6dee7b3a)
|
||||
---
|
||||
ospfd/ospf_te.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
|
||||
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_te.c b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
index 885b915585..23a1b181ec 100644
|
||||
--- a/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
@@ -2647,6 +2647,7 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_pref(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
struct ext_tlv_prefix *ext;
|
||||
struct ext_subtlv_prefix_sid *pref_sid;
|
||||
uint32_t label;
|
||||
+ uint16_t len, size;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get corresponding Subnet from Link State Data Base */
|
||||
ext = (struct ext_tlv_prefix *)TLV_HDR_TOP(lsa->data);
|
||||
@@ -2668,6 +2669,18 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_pref(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
ote_debug(" |- Process Extended Prefix LSA %pI4 for subnet %pFX",
|
||||
&lsa->data->id, &pref);
|
||||
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Check Extended Prefix TLV size against LSA size
|
||||
+ * as only one TLV is allowed per LSA
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ len = TLV_BODY_SIZE(&ext->header);
|
||||
+ size = lsa->size - (OSPF_LSA_HEADER_SIZE + TLV_HDR_SIZE);
|
||||
+ if (len != size || len <= 0) {
|
||||
+ ote_debug(" |- Wrong TLV size: %u instead of %u",
|
||||
+ (uint32_t)len, (uint32_t)size);
|
||||
+ return -1;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Initialize TLV browsing */
|
||||
ls_pref = subnet->ls_pref;
|
||||
pref_sid = (struct ext_subtlv_prefix_sid *)((char *)(ext) + TLV_HDR_SIZE
|
||||
@@ -2778,8 +2791,20 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
ote_debug(" |- Process Extended Link LSA %pI4 for edge %pI4",
|
||||
&lsa->data->id, &edge->attributes->standard.local);
|
||||
|
||||
- /* Initialize TLV browsing */
|
||||
- len = TLV_BODY_SIZE(&ext->header) - EXT_TLV_LINK_SIZE;
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Check Extended Link TLV size against LSA size
|
||||
+ * as only one TLV is allowed per LSA
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ len = TLV_BODY_SIZE(&ext->header);
|
||||
+ i = lsa->size - (OSPF_LSA_HEADER_SIZE + TLV_HDR_SIZE);
|
||||
+ if (len != i || len <= 0) {
|
||||
+ ote_debug(" |- Wrong TLV size: %u instead of %u",
|
||||
+ (uint32_t)len, (uint32_t)i);
|
||||
+ return -1;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /* Initialize subTLVs browsing */
|
||||
+ len -= EXT_TLV_LINK_SIZE;
|
||||
tlvh = (struct tlv_header *)((char *)(ext) + TLV_HDR_SIZE
|
||||
+ EXT_TLV_LINK_SIZE);
|
||||
for (; sum < len; tlvh = TLV_HDR_NEXT(tlvh)) {
|
||||
@@ -2789,6 +2814,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ntohs(tlvh->type)) {
|
||||
case EXT_SUBTLV_ADJ_SID:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) != EXT_SUBTLV_ADJ_SID_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
adj = (struct ext_subtlv_adj_sid *)tlvh;
|
||||
label = CHECK_FLAG(adj->flags,
|
||||
EXT_SUBTLV_LINK_ADJ_SID_VFLG)
|
||||
@@ -2815,6 +2842,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case EXT_SUBTLV_LAN_ADJ_SID:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) != EXT_SUBTLV_LAN_ADJ_SID_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
ladj = (struct ext_subtlv_lan_adj_sid *)tlvh;
|
||||
label = CHECK_FLAG(ladj->flags,
|
||||
EXT_SUBTLV_LINK_ADJ_SID_VFLG)
|
||||
@@ -2844,6 +2873,8 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case EXT_SUBTLV_RMT_ITF_ADDR:
|
||||
+ if (TLV_BODY_SIZE(tlvh) != EXT_SUBTLV_RMT_ITF_ADDR_SIZE)
|
||||
+ break;
|
||||
rmt = (struct ext_subtlv_rmt_itf_addr *)tlvh;
|
||||
if (CHECK_FLAG(atr->flags, LS_ATTR_NEIGH_ADDR)
|
||||
&& IPV4_ADDR_SAME(&atr->standard.remote,
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.35.3
|
||||
|
82
0023-ospfd-protect-call-to-get_edge-in-ospf_te.c.patch
Normal file
82
0023-ospfd-protect-call-to-get_edge-in-ospf_te.c.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
From cef38442420aeac8e163f8aa55f1b985908f993c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:42:06 +0200
|
||||
Upstream: yes
|
||||
References: CVE-2024-34088,bsc#1223786,gh#FRRouting/frr#16088
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ospfd: protect call to get_edge() in ospf_te.c
|
||||
|
||||
During fuzzing, Iggy Frankovic discovered that get_edge() function in ospf_te.c
|
||||
could return null pointer, in particular when the link_id or advertised router
|
||||
IP addresses are fuzzed. As the null pointer returned by get_edge() function is
|
||||
not handlei by calling functions, this could cause ospfd crash.
|
||||
|
||||
This patch introduces new verification of returned pointer by get_edge()
|
||||
function and stop the processing in case of null pointer. In addition, link ID
|
||||
and advertiser router ID are validated before calling ls_find_edge_by_key() to
|
||||
avoid the creation of a new edge with an invalid key.
|
||||
|
||||
CVE-2024-34088
|
||||
|
||||
Co-authored-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyfran@amazon.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 8c177d69e32b91b45bda5fc5da6511fa03dc11ca)
|
||||
---
|
||||
ospfd/ospf_te.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
|
||||
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_te.c b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
index 23a1b181ec..d1f114e30a 100644
|
||||
--- a/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_te.c
|
||||
@@ -1686,6 +1686,11 @@ static struct ls_edge *get_edge(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ls_node_id adv,
|
||||
struct ls_edge *edge;
|
||||
struct ls_attributes *attr;
|
||||
|
||||
+ /* Check that Link ID and Node ID are valid */
|
||||
+ if (IPV4_NET0(link_id.s_addr) || IPV4_NET0(adv.id.ip.addr.s_addr) ||
|
||||
+ adv.origin != OSPFv2)
|
||||
+ return NULL;
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* Search Edge that corresponds to the Link ID */
|
||||
key = ((uint64_t)ntohl(link_id.s_addr)) & 0xffffffff;
|
||||
edge = ls_find_edge_by_key(ted, key);
|
||||
@@ -1758,6 +1763,10 @@ static void ospf_te_update_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ls_vertex *vertex,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get Corresponding Edge from Link State Data Base */
|
||||
edge = get_edge(ted, vertex->node->adv, link_data);
|
||||
+ if (!edge) {
|
||||
+ ote_debug(" |- Found no edge from Link Data. Abort!");
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
attr = edge->attributes;
|
||||
|
||||
/* re-attached edge to vertex if needed */
|
||||
@@ -2276,11 +2285,11 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_te(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get corresponding Edge from Link State Data Base */
|
||||
- if (IPV4_NET0(attr.standard.local.s_addr) && !attr.standard.local_id) {
|
||||
- ote_debug(" |- Found no TE Link local address/ID. Abort!");
|
||||
+ edge = get_edge(ted, attr.adv, attr.standard.local);
|
||||
+ if (!edge) {
|
||||
+ ote_debug(" |- Found no edge from Link local add./ID. Abort!");
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
- edge = get_edge(ted, attr.adv, attr.standard.local);
|
||||
old = edge->attributes;
|
||||
|
||||
ote_debug(" |- Process Traffic Engineering LSA %pI4 for Edge %pI4",
|
||||
@@ -2786,6 +2795,10 @@ static int ospf_te_parse_ext_link(struct ls_ted *ted, struct ospf_lsa *lsa)
|
||||
lnid.id.ip.area_id = lsa->area->area_id;
|
||||
ext = (struct ext_tlv_link *)TLV_HDR_TOP(lsa->data);
|
||||
edge = get_edge(ted, lnid, ext->link_data);
|
||||
+ if (!edge) {
|
||||
+ ote_debug(" |- Found no edge from Extended Link Data. Abort!");
|
||||
+ return -1;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
atr = edge->attributes;
|
||||
|
||||
ote_debug(" |- Process Extended Link LSA %pI4 for edge %pI4",
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.35.3
|
||||
|
17
frr.changes
17
frr.changes
@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Tue Jun 4 21:27:48 UTC 2024 - Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
- Apply upstream fix solving ospfd denial of service via get_edge()
|
||||
function returning a NULL pointer (CVE-2024-34088,bsc#1223786,
|
||||
gh#FRRouting/frr#16088).
|
||||
[+ 0023-ospfd-protect-call-to-get_edge-in-ospf_te.c.patch]
|
||||
- Apply upstream fix solving ospfd buffer overflow and daemon crash
|
||||
in ospf_te_parse_ext_link for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt
|
||||
to read Segment Routing Adjacency SID subTLVs (CVE-2024-31951,
|
||||
bsc#1222528,gh#FRRouting/frr#16088).
|
||||
[+ 0022-ospfd-Correct-Opaque-LSA-Extended-parser.patch]
|
||||
- Apply upstream fix solving ospfd buffer overflow and daemon crash
|
||||
in RI parsing with OSPF TE (CVE-2024-31950,bsc#1222526,
|
||||
gh#FRRouting/frr#16088).
|
||||
[+ 0021-ospfd-Solved-crash-in-RI-parsing-with-OSPF-TE.patch]
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Wed Apr 24 10:40:57 UTC 2024 - Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
|
3
frr.spec
3
frr.spec
@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ Patch17: 0017-bgpd-Fix-use-beyond-end-of-stream-of-labeled-unicast.patch
|
||||
Patch18: 0018-bgpd-Flowspec-overflow-issue.patch
|
||||
Patch19: 0019-bgpd-fix-error-handling-when-receiving-BGP-Prefix-SID-attribute.patch
|
||||
Patch20: 0020-ospfd-Solved-crash-in-OSPF-TE-parsing.patch
|
||||
Patch21: 0021-ospfd-Solved-crash-in-RI-parsing-with-OSPF-TE.patch
|
||||
Patch22: 0022-ospfd-Correct-Opaque-LSA-Extended-parser.patch
|
||||
Patch23: 0023-ospfd-protect-call-to-get_edge-in-ospf_te.c.patch
|
||||
BuildRequires: autoconf
|
||||
BuildRequires: automake
|
||||
BuildRequires: bison >= 2.7
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user