From 3f9e5342937f7b528a35727ae417597f82ef8f98f514b850fab2a2ff4a1a3b15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fridrich Strba <fstrba@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 05:43:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] OBS-URL:
 https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Java:Factory/java-1_8_0-openjdk?expand=0&rev=299

---
 java-1_8_0-openjdk.changes |  7 ++++++
 java-1_8_0-openjdk.spec    |  7 ------
 s390-java-opts.patch       | 45 --------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 s390-java-opts.patch

diff --git a/java-1_8_0-openjdk.changes b/java-1_8_0-openjdk.changes
index df9434c..b8534cc 100644
--- a/java-1_8_0-openjdk.changes
+++ b/java-1_8_0-openjdk.changes
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Wed Sep 26 05:39:58 UTC 2018 - Fridrich Strba <fstrba@suse.com>
+
+- Removed patch:
+  * s390-java-opts.patch
+    - Not needed any more
+
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sun Sep 23 06:22:07 UTC 2018 - Fridrich Strba <fstrba@suse.com>
 
diff --git a/java-1_8_0-openjdk.spec b/java-1_8_0-openjdk.spec
index fbc00db..61ee7ad 100644
--- a/java-1_8_0-openjdk.spec
+++ b/java-1_8_0-openjdk.spec
@@ -197,8 +197,6 @@ Patch14:        zero-javadoc-verbose.patch
 #
 # Patch for PPC
 Patch103:       ppc-zero-hotspot.patch
-# Patch for S390
-Patch104:       s390-java-opts.patch
 Patch1000:      icedtea-3.0.1-sunec.patch
 Patch1001:      java-1_8_0-openjdk-suse-desktop-files.patch
 Patch1002:      icedtea-3.8.0-s390.patch
@@ -580,11 +578,6 @@ patch -p0 -i %{PATCH14}
 patch -p0 -i %{PATCH103}
 %endif
 
-%ifarch s390
-# S390 memory issues
-patch -p0 -i %{PATCH104}
-%endif
-
 patch -p0 -i %{PATCH2001}
 patch -p0 -i %{PATCH2002}
 
diff --git a/s390-java-opts.patch b/s390-java-opts.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 43acad3..0000000
--- a/s390-java-opts.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
---- openjdk/common/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4	2016-07-26 12:28:03.054552831 +0200
-+++ openjdk/common/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4	2016-07-26 12:30:34.651143737 +0200
-@@ -351,29 +351,29 @@
-   AC_MSG_CHECKING([flags for boot jdk java command for big workloads])
- 
-   # Starting amount of heap memory.
--  if test "x$OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_ARCH" = "xs390"; then
-+  # if test "x$OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_ARCH" = "xs390"; then
-     ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xms256M],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])
--  else
--    ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xms64M],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])
--  fi
-+  # else
-+  #   ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xms64M],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])
-+  # fi
- 
-   # Maximum amount of heap memory.
-   # Maximum stack size.
--  if test "x$BOOT_JDK_BITS" = x32; then
--    if test "x$OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_ARCH" = "xs390"; then
-+  # if test "x$BOOT_JDK_BITS" = x32; then
-+  #   if test "x$OPENJDK_BUILD_CPU_ARCH" = "xs390"; then
-       JVM_MAX_HEAP=768M
--    else
--      JVM_MAX_HEAP=1100M
--    fi
-+  #   else
-+  #     JVM_MAX_HEAP=1100M
-+  #   fi
-     STACK_SIZE=768
--  else
-+  # else
-     # Running Javac on a JVM on a 64-bit machine, takes more space since 64-bit
-     # pointers are used. Apparently, we need to increase the heap and stack
-     # space for the jvm. More specifically, when running javac to build huge
-     # jdk batch
--    JVM_MAX_HEAP=1600M
--    STACK_SIZE=1536
--  fi
-+  #   JVM_MAX_HEAP=1600M
-+  #   STACK_SIZE=1536
-+  # fi
-   ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xmx$JVM_MAX_HEAP],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])
-   ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-XX:ThreadStackSize=$STACK_SIZE],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])
-   ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-XX:PermSize=32m],boot_jdk_jvmargs_big,[$JAVA])