SHA256
1
0
forked from pool/mdadm
mdadm/0002-DDF-guard-against-pdnum-being-negative.patch
Neil Brown ceac01b560 - 0001-DDF-mark-missing-on-assembly-device-properly.patch
- 0002-DDF-guard-against-pdnum-being-negative.patch
- 0003-DDF-fix-possible-mdmon-crash-when-updating-metadata.patch
- 0004-DDF-Don-t-fail-compare_super_ddf-due-to-re-configure.patch
  More upstream DDF fixes (bnc#866660)

- 0001-mdmon-.service-Change-type-of-process-start-up-to-fo.patch
- 0003-Work-around-architectures-having-statfs.f_type-defin.patch
- 0004-DDF-report-seq-counter-as-events.patch
- 0005-DDF-when-first-activating-an-array-record-any-missin.patch
  Two fixes for DDF (bnc#866660) and a couple of other upstream fixes
  just for good measure.

- 0001-Assemble-allow-load_devices-to-change-the-st-which-i.patch
  0002-Assemble-re-arrange-freeing-of-tst-in-load_devices.patch
  0003-Assemble-change-load_devices-to-return-most_recent-s.patch
  Allow RAID5 to be assembled even when firs device listed recently
  failed (bnc#865221)

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/mdadm?expand=0&rev=105
2014-04-02 06:19:16 +00:00

91 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff

From a44e993e37a76561fa30e932b93d85fab9bcc272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:34:10 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] DDF: guard against ->pdnum being negative.
It is conceivable that ->pdnum could be -1, though only if
the metadata is corrupt.
We should be careful not to use it if it is.
Also remove an assignment for pdnum to ->container_member.
This is never used and cannot possibly mean anything.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
super-ddf.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- mdadm-3.3.orig/super-ddf.c
+++ mdadm-3.3/super-ddf.c
@@ -2465,7 +2465,11 @@ static struct extent *get_extents(struct
struct extent *rv;
int n = 0;
unsigned int i;
- __u16 state = be16_to_cpu(ddf->phys->entries[dl->pdnum].state);
+ __u16 state;
+
+ if (dl->pdnum < 0)
+ return NULL;
+ state = be16_to_cpu(ddf->phys->entries[dl->pdnum].state);
if ((state & (DDF_Online|DDF_Failed|DDF_Missing)) != DDF_Online)
return NULL;
@@ -2900,7 +2904,7 @@ static int remove_from_super_ddf(struct
if (dl->major == dk->major &&
dl->minor == dk->minor)
break;
- if (!dl)
+ if (!dl || dl->pdnum < 0)
return -1;
if (st->update_tail) {
@@ -4096,7 +4100,7 @@ static int ddf_open_new(struct supertype
if (dl->major == dev->disk.major &&
dl->minor == dev->disk.minor)
break;
- if (!dl) {
+ if (!dl || dl->pdnum < 0) {
pr_err("%s: device %d/%d of subarray %d not found in meta data\n",
__func__, dev->disk.major, dev->disk.minor, n);
return -1;
@@ -4728,6 +4732,9 @@ static void ddf_process_update(struct su
for (dl = ddf->dlist; dl; dl = dl->next) {
unsigned int vn = 0;
int in_degraded = 0;
+
+ if (dl->pdnum < 0)
+ continue;
for (vcl = ddf->conflist; vcl ; vcl = vcl->next) {
unsigned int dn, ibvd;
const struct vd_config *conf;
@@ -4991,7 +4998,11 @@ static struct mdinfo *ddf_activate_spare
int is_dedicated = 0;
struct extent *ex;
unsigned int j;
- be16 state = ddf->phys->entries[dl->pdnum].state;
+ be16 state;
+
+ if (dl->pdnum < 0)
+ continue;
+ state = ddf->phys->entries[dl->pdnum].state;
if (be16_and(state,
cpu_to_be16(DDF_Failed|DDF_Missing)) ||
!be16_and(state,
@@ -5082,7 +5093,6 @@ static struct mdinfo *ddf_activate_spare
di->recovery_start = 0;
di->data_offset = pos;
di->component_size = a->info.component_size;
- di->container_member = dl->pdnum;
di->next = rv;
rv = di;
dprintf("%x:%x (%08x) to be %d at %llu\n",
@@ -5140,7 +5150,7 @@ static struct mdinfo *ddf_activate_spare
if (dl->major == di->disk.major
&& dl->minor == di->disk.minor)
break;
- if (!dl) {
+ if (!dl || dl->pdnum < 0) {
pr_err("%s: BUG: can't find disk %d (%d/%d)\n",
__func__, di->disk.raid_disk,
di->disk.major, di->disk.minor);