SHA256
1
0
forked from pool/pam_kwallet
pam_kwallet/0002-Avoid-dropping-privileges-by-initializing-gcrypt-sec.patch
Fabian Vogt 51db465ce5 - Add various patches (pending upstream review) to fix several
issues:
  * 0001-Several-cleanups.patch
  * 0002-Avoid-dropping-privileges-by-initializing-gcrypt-sec.patch
  * 0003-Check-for-a-graphical-session.patch

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/KDE:Frameworks5/pam_kwallet?expand=0&rev=38
2017-08-09 08:40:05 +00:00

39 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff

From a8153375a5006f5ca766b58a1a8f488699314a74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Vogt <fabian@ritter-vogt.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:27:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Avoid dropping privileges by initializing gcrypt secmem
It's a documented side effect that initialization of secure memory in gcrypt
drops privileges if getuid() != geteuid(). This results in breaking setuid
callers, like sudo or su.
---
pam_kwallet.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/pam_kwallet.c b/pam_kwallet.c
index cba57e7..dc61115 100644
--- a/pam_kwallet.c
+++ b/pam_kwallet.c
@@ -696,12 +696,18 @@ int kwallet_hash(const char *passphrase, struct passwd *userInfo, char *key)
gcry_error_t error;
+ /* We cannot call GCRYCTL_INIT_SECMEM as it drops privileges if getuid() != geteuid().
+ * PAM modules are in many cases executed through setuid binaries, which this call
+ * would break.
+ * It was never effective anyway as neither key nor passphrase are in secure memory,
+ * which is a prerequisite for secure operation...
error = gcry_control(GCRYCTL_INIT_SECMEM, 32768, 0);
if (error != 0) {
free(salt);
syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s-kwalletd: Can't get secure memory: %d", logPrefix, error);
return 1;
}
+ */
gcry_control (GCRYCTL_INITIALIZATION_FINISHED, 0);
--
2.13.2