SHA256
1
0
forked from pool/qemu
qemu/0069-sd-sdhci-check-data-length-during-d.patch
Bruce Rogers 70b09a5bad Accepting request 461715 from Virtualization:Staging
Update to v2.8.0, including integration of SLE qemu package so we are "Factory First" again for SLE qemu. Includes some spec file tweaks/cleanups as well. A number of post v2.8.0 security fixes are also included.

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/461715
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Virtualization/qemu?expand=0&rev=329
2017-03-15 19:38:55 +00:00

38 lines
1.6 KiB
Diff

From f774e0e5e658fb9387c10634e2b880a1657ce2ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:29:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] sd: sdhci: check data length during dma_memory_read
While doing multi block SDMA transfer in routine
'sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks', the 's->fifo_buffer' starting
index 'begin' and data length 's->data_count' could end up to be same.
This could lead to an OOB access issue. Correct transfer data length
to avoid it.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reported-by: Jiang Xin <jiangxin1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20170130064736.9236-1-ppandit@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
(cherry picked from commit 42922105beb14c2fc58185ea022b9f72fb5465e9)
[BR: CVE-2017-5667 BSC#1022541]
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>
---
hw/sd/sdhci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
index 01fbf228be..5bd5ab6319 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks(SDHCIState *s)
boundary_count -= block_size - begin;
}
dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, s->sdmasysad,
- &s->fifo_buffer[begin], s->data_count);
+ &s->fifo_buffer[begin], s->data_count - begin);
s->sdmasysad += s->data_count - begin;
if (s->data_count == block_size) {
for (n = 0; n < block_size; n++) {