SHA256
1
0
forked from pool/qemu
qemu/0017-linux-user-Run-multi-threaded-code-.patch

41 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

From bb2c2983421cc2b39cd7174f9bfdbb0376d5fcb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:40:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: Run multi-threaded code on a single core
Running multi-threaded code can easily expose some of the fundamental
breakages in QEMU's design. It's just not a well supported scenario.
So if we pin the whole process to a single host CPU, we guarantee that
we will never have concurrent memory access actually happen. We can still
get scheduled away at any time, so it's no complete guarantee, but apparently
it reduces the odds well enough to get my test cases to pass.
This gets Java 1.7 working for me again on my test box.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 8abe4cd..72701d4 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -4599,6 +4599,15 @@ static int do_fork(CPUArchState *env, unsigned int flags, abi_ulong newsp,
if (nptl_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
cpu_set_tls (new_env, newtls);
+ /* agraf: Pin ourselves to a single CPU when running multi-threaded.
+ This turned out to improve stability for me. */
+ {
+ cpu_set_t mask;
+ CPU_ZERO(&mask);
+ CPU_SET(0, &mask);
+ sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask);
+ }
+
/* Grab a mutex so that thread setup appears atomic. */
pthread_mutex_lock(&clone_lock);