rpmlint/0001-Tighten-wrong-script-interpreter-check-to-lower-fals.patch

From 3433a3cc77a05af3a7e0588899f61028b5546e64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dirk Mueller <dirk@dmllr.de>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 14:00:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Tighten wrong-script-interpreter check to lower false
 positives

The check wasn't looking if the file is actually marked as
executable or in one of the known-scripts-only directories. Without
this patch, the check will fire on documentation examples that
just happen to be detected as script, but where the shebang
isn't actually captured by the find_requires rpm scripts. Omit
warning about those, as there are more likely legitimate reasons.
---
 FilesCheck.py | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/FilesCheck.py b/FilesCheck.py
index 1852b38..0b93e73 100644
--- a/FilesCheck.py
+++ b/FilesCheck.py
@@ -848,7 +848,10 @@ class FilesCheck(AbstractCheck.AbstractCheck):
                     elif interpreter or mode_is_exec or script_regex.search(f):
                         if interpreter:
                             res = interpreter_regex.search(interpreter)
-                            if (res and res.group(1) == 'env') or not res:
+                            is_wrong_interpreter = (not res or (res and
+                                                    res.group(1) == 'env'))
+                            if ((mode_is_exec or script_regex.search(f)) and
+                                    is_wrong_interpreter):
                                 printError(pkg, 'wrong-script-interpreter',
                                            f, interpreter, interpreter_args)
                         elif not nonexec_file and not \
-- 
2.14.1