diff --git a/LibraryPolicyCheck.py b/LibraryPolicyCheck.py
index 3177512..cd2b226 100644
--- a/LibraryPolicyCheck.py
+++ b/LibraryPolicyCheck.py
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ _essential_dependencies = (
       "libgcrypt.so.11",
       "libgdbm_compat.so.3",
       "libgdbm.so.3",
+      "libgfortran3",
       "libgio-2.0.so.0",
       "libglib-2.0.so.0",
       "libgmodule-2.0.so.0",
@@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ class LibraryPolicyCheck(AbstractCheck.AbstractCheck):
         # Search for shared libraries in this package
         libs = set()
         libs_needed = set()
+        libs_to_dir = dict()
         dirs = set()
         reqlibs = set()
         pkg_requires = set(map(lambda x: string.split(x[0],'(')[0], pkg.requires()))
@@ -508,8 +510,10 @@ class LibraryPolicyCheck(AbstractCheck.AbstractCheck):
                         bi = BinaryInfo(pkg, filename, f, 0)
                         libs_needed = libs_needed.union(bi.needed)
                         if bi.soname != 0:
+                            lib_dir = string.join(f.split('/')[:-1], '/')
                             libs.add(bi.soname)
-                            dirs.add(string.join(f.split('/')[:-1], '/'))
+                            libs_to_dir[bi.soname] = lib_dir
+                            dirs.add(lib_dir)
                         if bi.soname in pkg_requires:
                             # But not if the library is used by the pkg itself
                             # This avoids program packages with their own private lib
@@ -522,11 +526,35 @@ class LibraryPolicyCheck(AbstractCheck.AbstractCheck):
         std_dirs = dirs.intersection(('/lib', '/lib64', '/usr/lib', '/usr/lib64', 
             '/opt/kde3/lib'))
 
+        non_std_dirs = dirs.difference(std_dirs)
+
         # If this is a program package (all libs it provides are
         # required by itself), bail out
         if not pkg.name.startswith("lib") and len(libs.difference(reqlibs)) == 0:
             return
 
+        std_lib_package = False
+        if pkg.name.startswith("lib") and pkg.name[-1].isdigit():
+            std_lib_package = True
+
+        # ignore libs in a versioned non_std_dir
+        if std_lib_package:
+            for lib in libs.copy():
+                lib_dir = libs_to_dir[lib]
+                for lib_part in lib_dir.split('/'):
+                    if len(lib_part) == 0:
+                        continue
+                    if lib_part[-1].isdigit() and not lib_part.endswith("lib64"):
+                        libs.remove(lib)
+                        break
+
+        # Check for non-versioned libs in a std lib package
+        if std_lib_package:
+            for lib in libs.copy():
+                if not lib[-1].isdigit():
+                    printWarning(pkg, "shlib-unversioned-lib", lib)
+                    libs.remove(lib)
+
         # If this package should be or should be splitted into shlib
         # package(s)
         if len(libs) > 0 and len(std_dirs) > 0:
@@ -606,5 +634,10 @@ a seperate one to reduce the additional dependencies for other users of this lib
 'shlib-policy-missing-lib',
 """Your package starts with 'lib' as part of it's name, but does not provide
 any libraries. It must not be called a lib-package then. Give it a more
-sensible name."""
+sensible name.""",
+'shlib-unversioned-lib',
+"""Your package matches the Shared Library Policy Naming Scheme but contains an
+unversioned library. Therefore it is very unlikely that your package can be installed
+in parallel to another version of this library package. Consider moving unversioned
+parts into a runtime package."""
 )
diff --git a/rpmlint.changes b/rpmlint.changes
index ef9432a..fd5adb8 100644
--- a/rpmlint.changes
+++ b/rpmlint.changes
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Wed Dec  3 08:50:33 CET 2008 - dmueller@suse.de
+
+- update suse version check (add 11.1, drop 10.2)
+- check library packages more strict (bnc#456053)
+- ignore shared objects in a versioned non-std subdir (bnc#435588)
+
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Thu Nov 20 23:12:56 CET 2008 - dmueller@suse.de
 
diff --git a/rpmlint.spec b/rpmlint.spec
index 5260387..4ecae70 100644
--- a/rpmlint.spec
+++ b/rpmlint.spec
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Name:           rpmlint
 BuildRequires:  rpm-python
 Summary:        Rpm correctness checker
 Version:        0.84
-Release:        3
+Release:        4
 Source0:        %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Source1:        config
 Source1001:     config.in
@@ -214,6 +214,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 /usr/share/man/man1/rpmlint.1.gz
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Dec 03 2008 dmueller@suse.de
+- update suse version check (add 11.1, drop 10.2)
+- check library packages more strict (bnc#456053)
+- ignore shared objects in a versioned non-std subdir (bnc#435588)
 * Thu Nov 20 2008 dmueller@suse.de
 - only test for regular files in ChkPkgConfig check
 * Fri Nov 07 2008 dmueller@suse.de
diff --git a/suse-version.diff b/suse-version.diff
index 067c2d2..24da067 100644
--- a/suse-version.diff
+++ b/suse-version.diff
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@
  
 -            res = prereq_regex.search(line)
 +            res = suse_version_regex.search(line)
-+            if res and int(res.group(1)) > 0 and int(res.group(1)) < 1020:
++            if res and int(res.group(1)) > 0 and int(res.group(1)) < 1030:
 +                printWarning(pkg, "obsolete-suse-version-check", res.group(1))
-+            elif res and int(res.group(1)) > 1100:
++            elif res and int(res.group(1)) > 1110:
 +                printError(pkg, "invalid-suse-version-check", res.group(1))
 +
 +            res = prereq_regex.search(line)