We can't generally assume ISOs can be fetched from backend (we can't
have this on IBS), so publish it - and disable the actual publishing
on the staging backend of OBS
Submitters complain more and more about the spam they're getting from
staging projects - and we rather leave that weapon for actual feedback.
One especially annoying case is if a package is added to one staging project
and then later moved to another, the submitter will receive notifications
of all kind of bots and actions for both staging projects.
The _result view checks way more things than we need, so just iterate
through the architectures of a repository and check the binaryversions
per arch. And combine the sha1sums to one sha1 per repository
For whatever reason the state hash only includes the overall publish states
and not the binaries within the repository. As such, rebuilding state
before a rebuild and after may be the same.
Distinct copyrights were left as I do not wish to track down commit
history to ensure it properly documents the copyright holders. Also left
non-GPLv2 licenses and left bs_copy untouched as a mirror from OBS.
Already have a mix of with and without headers and even OBS does not place
on majority of files. If SUSE lawyers have an issue it will come up in
legal review for Factory.
Since the tool has been expanded to work on any repository, there are more
repositories that would want direct comments than devel. Set the value
to be devel for the openSUSE products which are the places where that is
desirable.
The rework includes a variety of changes:
- multiple actions per request supported
- automatically detecting "main" repo (useful for devel/home projects)
- full layered repository path state and published taken into account
- arbitrary repository name (ie. not just standard) supported
- intermediate results (used for staging) no longer accept (even if no
problems detected) until all layers are published
- no longer tied to staging process, but still supports staging workflow
- robust handling of repository state changes during review cycle
- multiple repositories supported for project_only output (ie. file name)
- project_only run supports any OBS project instead of only products
- maintenance_release requests supported with alternate staging approach
These methods provide for a generic place to store meta data related to
a project. For the time being, keep the original :Staging/dashboard
location for openSUSE products.
Given the slow migration of everything to the shared project config in
tools that change project contexts multiple times a consistent way of
accessing the config without forcing remote calls is needed.
The original case was to enable remote config, but in general and with
up-coming changes having the staging setting falsely set like this is not
ideal. Since the remote config is loaded via attribute this does not even
affect it anymore. The proper change is to make the "dashboard" container
configurable which is planned.
Otherwise, :Update projects match the primary product settings which
gives the wrong impression to tools as things like :Update:Staging do
not exist. Since :Update and other sub-projects are in a different phase
of development they should really have separate settings. :Ports however
does have stagings and in theory should act like parent product. If it
becomes desirable to split that can be done in the future.
Some policy settings related to ReviewBots likely are desirable to carry
over, but that can be resolved in follow-up as they are not currently used.
As the remote config is no longer optional for SLE and is utilized by
openSUSE to the point were it is dangerous not to load the remote config
it should be required. Currently only certain users call apply_remote()
while this will make it built-in during construction and thus makes the
usage consistent and no longer require StagingAPI.
