It's a little suprising fallout from 1870e989a4d7a1f846dc06895402dc1395b34c11,
but we don't have package lists in "rings" anymore, but only in one
ring.
* It introduces a new configuration parameter 'required-source-maintainer'.
* If defined, it is expected to be a maintainer of the devel project.
* If that's not the case, the request is declined and an add_role
request is created.
Co-authored-by: Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <ancor@suse.de>
Co-authored-by: Knut Alejandro Anderssen González <kanderssen@suse.com>
A rather small reviewbot just made for one thing: check maintenance
release requests. They are much easier to handle: they are only created
on locked projects, so there is no waiting required. Just checking
and if it's broken, the request can be declined.
There is no product that wants all suggests for all products on all groups,
so the only product left that wants to have suggests is Tumbleweed for the DVD
pattern
To solve the suggests we run a global transaction on the
result + its suggests to determine packageand supplements.
To avoid problems (in general) we discard obsolete and conflicts
in packages - so we can have product groups with conflicting packages
and still get the additional supplements
The heuristic calculating the product family doesn't really work
for ports, so give the tool some hints in the config. And as 15.1
doesn't have a baseurl yet, we need to give 15.0 one specifically.
The config default for pseudometa package (00Meta) does not
exist for Tumbleweed, so we need to add an override for :ARM
to contain the proper information so that the publishing
logic doesn't stop. Also update correspondingly for Leap
reduce() is no longer part of python core, but we don't
need it actually - since we use remote configs, we have
no more required settings (otherwise we put them in remote).
And to quote the python docu as I found it interestingly
proving my own impression of this code:
> Removed reduce(). Use functools.reduce() if you really need it;
however, 99 percent of the time an explicit for loop is more readable.
Distinct copyrights were left as I do not wish to track down commit
history to ensure it properly documents the copyright holders. Also left
non-GPLv2 licenses and left bs_copy untouched as a mirror from OBS.
Already have a mix of with and without headers and even OBS does not place
on majority of files. If SUSE lawyers have an issue it will come up in
legal review for Factory.
Since the tool has been expanded to work on any repository, there are more
repositories that would want direct comments than devel. Set the value
to be devel for the openSUSE products which are the places where that is
desirable.
