Commit d424db2354 removed an instance of strerrorname_np() because it
was breaking building with musl libc. A recent RISC-V patch ended up
re-introducing it again by accident.
Put this function in the baddies list in checkpatch.pl to avoid this
situation again. This is what it will look like next time:
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-temp-test.patch
ERROR: use strerror() instead of strerrorname_np()
#22: FILE: target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:1058:
+ strerrorname_np(errno));
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
The .mailmap file fixes mistake we already did.
Do not use it when running checkpatch.pl, otherwise
we might commit the very same mistakes.
Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Commit f5177798d8 ("scripts: report on author emails
that are mangled by the mailing list") added a check
for qemu-devel@ list, extend the regexp to cover more
such qemu-trivial@, qemu-block@ and qemu-ppc@.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Add two spelling check options (--codespell and --codespellfile) to
enhance spelling check through dictionary, which copied the Linux
kernel's implementation in checkpatch.pl.
This check uses the dictionary at "/usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt"
by default, if there is no dictionary specified under this path, it
will look for the dictionary of python3's codespell (This requires user
to add python3's path in environment variable $PATH, and to install
codespell by "pip install codespell").
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20240105083848.267192-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The softmmu/ directory contains files specific to system
emulation. Rename it as system/. Update meson rules, the
MAINTAINERS file and all the documentation and comments.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-14-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Since commit 262a69f428 ("osdep.h: Prohibit disabling assert()
in supported builds") we can not build QEMU with NDEBUG (or
G_DISABLE_ASSERT) defined, thus 'assert(0)' always aborts QEMU.
However some static analyzers / compilers doesn't notice NDEBUG
can't be defined and emit warnings if code is used after an
'assert(0)' call.
Apparently such compiler isn't as clever with G_DISABLE_ASSERT,
so we can silent these warnings by using g_assert_not_reached()
which is easier to read anyway.
In order to avoid these annoying warnings, add a checkpatch rule
to prohibit 'assert(0)'. Suggest using g_assert_not_reached()
instead. For example when reverting the previous patch we get:
ERROR: use g_assert_not_reached() instead of assert(0)
#21: FILE: target/ppc/dfp_helper.c:124:
+ assert(0); /* cannot get here */
ERROR: use g_assert_not_reached() instead of assert(0)
#30: FILE: target/ppc/dfp_helper.c:141:
+ assert(0); /* cannot get here */
total: 2 errors, 0 warnings, 16 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230221232520.14480-3-philmd@linaro.org>
checkpatch is unhappy about this line:
WARNING: Block comments use a leading /* on a separate line
#50: FILE: hw/acpi/nvdimm.c:1074:
+ aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */));
but there's nothing wrong with it - the check is just too simplistic. It
will also miss lines which mix inline and block comments.
Instead, let's strip all inline comments from a line and then check for block
comments.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Use the string equality operator "eq", and ensure that $1 is defined by
using "(try|)" instead of "(try)?". The alternative "((?:try)?)" is
longer and less readable.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Replace the global variables with inlined helper functions. getpagesize() is very
likely annotated with a "const" function attribute (at least with glibc), and thus
optimization should apply even better.
This avoids the need for a constructor initialization too.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220323155743.1585078-12-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
One less qemu-specific macro. It also helps to make some headers/units
only depend on glib, and thus moved in standalone projects eventually.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
One less qemu-specific macro. It also helps to make some headers/units
only depend on glib, and thus moved in standalone projects eventually.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
One less qemu-specific macro. It also helps to make some headers/units
only depend on glib, and thus moved in standalone projects eventually.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
g_memdup() is insecure and as been deprecated in GLib 2.68.
QEMU provides the safely equivalent g_memdup2() wrapper.
Do not allow more g_memdup() calls in the repository, provide
a hint to use g_memdup2().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210903174510.751630-29-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
There were recently some patches on the list which had their "From:"
line mangled like this:
From: qemu_oss--- via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Since our test in the checkpatch.pl script did not trigger here, the
patches finally also ended up in a pull request, with the wrong author
set. So let's improve the regular expression to also complain on
these new patterns, too.
Message-Id: <20210216071512.1199827-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
According to the coding style document, we should use literal '0x' prefix
instead of printf's '#' flag (which appears as '%#' or '%0#' in the format
string). Add a checkpatch rule to enforce that.
Note that checkpatch already had a similar rule for trace-events files.
Example usage:
$ scripts/checkpatch.pl --file chardev/baum.c
...
ERROR: Don't use '#' flag of printf format ('%#') in format strings, use '0x' prefix instead
#366: FILE: chardev/baum.c:366:
+ DPRINTF("Broken packet %#2x, tossing\n", req); \
...
ERROR: Don't use '#' flag of printf format ('%#') in format strings, use '0x' prefix instead
#472: FILE: chardev/baum.c:472:
+ DPRINTF("unrecognized request %0#2x\n", req);
...
Signed-off-by: Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20200914172623.72955-1-dovmurik@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Running checkpatch on a directory that contains a cover letter reports
this error:
Checking /tmp/tmpbnngauy3/0000-cover-letter.patch...
ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 lines checked
Let's skip cover letter as it is already done in the Linux kernel
commits 06330fc40e3f ("checkpatch: avoid NOT_UNIFIED_DIFF errors
on cover-letter.patch files") and a08ffbef4ab7 ("checkpatch: fix
ignoring cover-letter logic").
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200917170212.92672-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Allow changing allowed diff list at any point:
- when changing code under test
- when adding expected files
It's just a list of files so easy to review and merge anyway.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Using global expected/nonexpected values causes
false positives when testing multiple patches in one
checkpatch run: one patch can change expected,
another one non-expected.
Use local variables within process() to fix that.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
If the process documented in tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
is followed, then same patch never touches both expected
files and code. Teach checkpatch to enforce this rule.
Tested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
It's quite common to have a mini comment inside braces to acknowledge
we know it's empty. Expand the inline detection to allow closing
braces before the end of line.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com>
Copy and pasting from Thunderbird's "view source" window results in double
encoding of multibyte UTF-8 sequences. The appearance of those sequences is
very peculiar, so detect it and give an error despite the (low) possibility
of false positives.
As the major offender, I am also adding the same check to my applypatch-msg
and commit-msg hooks, but this will also cause patchew to croak loudly when
this mistake happens.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1558099140-53240-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In checkpatch we attempt to check for and warn about
block comments which start with /* or /** followed by a
non-blank. Unfortunately a bug in the regex meant that
we would incorrectly warn about comments starting with
"/**" with no following text:
git show 9813dc6ac3954d58ba16b3920556f106f97e1c67|./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
WARNING: Block comments use a leading /* on a separate line
#34: FILE: tests/libqtest.h:233:
+/**
The sequence "/\*\*?" was intended to match either "/*" or "/**",
but Perl's semantics for '?' allow it to backtrack and try the
"matches 0 chars" option if the "matches 1 char" choice leads to
a failure of the rest of the regex to match. Switch to "/\*\*?+"
which uses what perlre(1) calls the "possessive" quantifier form:
this means that if it matches the "/**" string it will not later
backtrack to matching just the "/*" prefix.
The other end of the regex is also wrong: it is attempting
to check for "/* or /** followed by something that isn't
just whitespace", but [ \t]*.+[ \t]* will match on pure
whitespace. This is less significant but means that a line
with just a comment-starter followed by trailing whitespace
will generate an incorrect warning about block comment style
as well as the correct error about trailing whitespace which
a different checkpatch test emits.
Fixes: 8c06fbdf36 ("scripts/checkpatch.pl: Enforce multiline comment syntax")
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190118165050.22270-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add optional colors to make seeing message types a bit easier.
The default is to show them on a tty.
Inspired by Linux commits 57230297116fa ("checkpatch: colorize output
to terminal") and 737c0767758b ("checkpatch: change format of --color
argument to --color[=WHEN]").
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Similar to how patchew output looks like for multiple patches,
say what file or patch is being tested _before_ emitting errors.
This is clearer to a human that scans the output from top to
bottom.
In addition, provide a truncated commit hash and subject instead of
the full hash, and process the commits first-to-last rather than
last-to-first.
Inspired by Linux commit 0dea9f1eef86bedacad91b6f652ca1ab0d08854c
("checkpatch: reduce number of `git log` calls with --git", 2016-03-20).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
