luc14n0/glib
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib.git synced 2024-12-25 15:06:14 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Unfortunately the mingw implementations of C99-style snprintf and

Browse Source 
2008-02-07  Tor Lillqvist  <tml@novell.com>

	* configure.in: Unfortunately the mingw implementations of
	C99-style snprintf and vsnprintf don't seem to be quite good
	enough, at least not in mingw-runtime-3.14. I don't know exactly
	what the problem is, but it is related to floating point
	formatting and decimal point vs. comma, and the symptoms show up
	in some dialogs in GIMP, presumably also elsewhere. The simple
	tests in AC_FUNC_VSNPRINTF_C99 and AC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99 aren't
	rigorous enough to notice, though. So preset
	ac_cv_func_vsnprintf_c99 and ac_cv_func_snprintf_c99 to "no".


svn path=/trunk/; revision=6482
This commit is contained in:
Tor Lillqvist 2008-02-07 13:07:19 +00:00 committed by Tor Lillqvist
parent a9287f0cdf
commit 0deb77b180
2 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
2008-02-07 Tor Lillqvist <tml@novell.com>
* configure.in: Unfortunately the mingw implementations of
C99-style snprintf and vsnprintf don't seem to be quite good
enough, at least not in mingw-runtime-3.14. I don't know exactly
what the problem is, but it is related to floating point
formatting and decimal point vs. comma, and the symptoms show up
in some dialogs in GIMP, presumably also elsewhere. The simple
tests in AC_FUNC_VSNPRINTF_C99 and AC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99 aren't
rigorous enough to notice, though. So preset
ac_cv_func_vsnprintf_c99 and ac_cv_func_snprintf_c99 to "no".
2008-02-07 12:58:54 Tim Janik <timj@imendio.com>
* Makefile.am: fixed build order to build gobject after gmodule gthread

9
configure.in
View File

@ -124,6 +124,15 @@ case "$host" in
GTHREAD_DEF=gthread.def
TESTGMODULE_EXP=testgmodule.exp
glib_pid_type='void *'
# Unfortunately the mingw implementations of C99-style snprintf and vsnprintf
# don't seem to be quite good enough, at least not in mingw-runtime-3.14.
# (Sorry, I don't know exactly what is the problem, but it is related to
# floating point formatting and decimal point vs. comma.)
# The simple tests in AC_FUNC_VSNPRINTF_C99 and AC_FUNC_SNPRINTF_C99 aren't
# rigorous enough to notice, though.
# So preset the autoconf cache variables.
ac_cv_func_vsnprintf_c99=no
ac_cv_func_snprintf_c99=no
;;
*)
glib_native_win32=no