gstrfuncs: Add back x + !x warning workaround

We thought we could drop the x + !x workaround in
commit eea87eff3f but apparently
not.

This commit adds it back, but with an added layer of indirection,
for aesthetics.

Closes: #2807
This commit is contained in:
Ray Strode 2022-11-04 13:10:40 -04:00
parent 05750454d5
commit 48730d2b30

View File

@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ gboolean (g_str_has_prefix) (const gchar *str,
#if G_GNUC_CHECK_VERSION (2, 0)
/* This macro is defeat a false -Wnonnull warning in GCC.
* Without it, it thinks strlen and memcmp may be getting passed NULL
* despite the explicit check for NULL right above the calls.
*/
#define _G_STR_NONNULL(x) (x + !x)
#define g_str_has_prefix(STR, PREFIX) \
(__builtin_constant_p (PREFIX)? \
G_GNUC_EXTENSION ({ \
@ -159,11 +165,11 @@ gboolean (g_str_has_prefix) (const gchar *str,
__result = (g_str_has_prefix) (__str, __prefix); \
else \
{ \
const size_t __str_len = strlen (__str); \
const size_t __prefix_len = strlen (__prefix); \
const size_t __str_len = strlen (_G_STR_NONNULL (__str)); \
const size_t __prefix_len = strlen (_G_STR_NONNULL (__prefix)); \
if (__str_len >= __prefix_len) \
__result = memcmp (__str, \
__prefix, \
__result = memcmp (_G_STR_NONNULL (__str), \
_G_STR_NONNULL (__prefix), \
__prefix_len) == 0; \
} \
__result; \
@ -183,11 +189,12 @@ gboolean (g_str_has_prefix) (const gchar *str,
__result = (g_str_has_suffix) (__str, __suffix); \
else \
{ \
const size_t __str_len = strlen (__str); \
const size_t __suffix_len = strlen (__suffix); \
const size_t __str_len = strlen (_G_STR_NONNULL (__str)); \
const size_t __suffix_len = strlen (_G_STR_NONNULL (__suffix)); \
if (__str_len >= __suffix_len) \
__result = memcmp (__str + __str_len - __suffix_len, \
__suffix, __suffix_len) == 0; \
_G_STR_NONNULL (__suffix), \
__suffix_len) == 0; \
} \
__result; \
}) \