[win32] Fix atomic ops on mingw*

Bug 682896 - glib doesn't build on mingw32
This commit is contained in:
Behdad Esfahbod 2013-02-25 22:48:03 -05:00
parent e1ccae8416
commit 547221b486

View File

@ -2373,7 +2373,7 @@ dnl
dnl We can currently support the atomic ops natively when building GLib
dnl with recent versions of GCC or MSVC. MSVC doesn't run ./configure,
dnl so we skip that case here and define G_ATOMIC_LOCK_FREE exactly when
dnl we are using GCC.
dnl we are using GCC (and not mingw*).
dnl
dnl Note that the atomic ops are only available with GCC on x86 when
dnl using -march=i486 or higher. If we detect that the atomic ops are
@ -2385,31 +2385,44 @@ dnl the user had the wrong build environment.
dnl We may add other compilers here in the future...
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for lock-free atomic intrinsics], glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free, [
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[volatile int atomic = 2;\
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap (&atomic, 2, 3);],
[glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free=yes],
[glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free=no])])
case $host in
*-*-mingw*)
glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free=yes
;;
*)
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[volatile int atomic = 2;\
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap (&atomic, 2, 3);],
[glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free=yes],
[glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free=no])
if test "$glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free" = "no"; then
SAVE_CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
CFLAGS="-march=i486"
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[volatile int atomic = 2;\
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap (&atomic, 2, 3);],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([GLib must be build with -march=i486 or later.])],
[])
CFLAGS="${SAVE_CFLAGS}"
fi
;;
esac])
if test "$glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free" = "no"; then
SAVE_CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
CFLAGS="-march=i486"
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[volatile int atomic = 2;\
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap (&atomic, 2, 3);],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([GLib must be build with -march=i486 or later.])],
[])
CFLAGS="${SAVE_CFLAGS}"
fi
# Some compilers support atomic operations but do not define
# __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, like clang
if test x"$glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free" = xyes; then
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4;],
[],
[AC_DEFINE(__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, 1, [ compiler supports atomic operations])])
fi
case $host in
*-*-mingw*)
;;
*)
# Some compilers support atomic operations but do not define
# __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, like clang
if test x"$glib_cv_g_atomic_lock_free" = xyes; then
AC_TRY_COMPILE([],
[__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4;],
[],
[AC_DEFINE(__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, 1, [ compiler supports atomic operations])])
fi
;;
esac
dnl We need a more robust approach here...
case $host_cpu in