Add tests for GSubprocess fd conflation issues

This tests for #2503. It's fragile, but there is no non-fragile way to
test this. If the test breaks in the future, it will pass without
successfully testing the bug, not fail spuriously, so I think this is
OK.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Catanzaro 2021-12-14 13:36:31 -06:00
parent b251a7cd18
commit d4c486779d
2 changed files with 195 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
#include <errno.h>
#ifdef G_OS_UNIX
#include <unistd.h>
#include <gio/gunixinputstream.h>
#include <gio/gunixoutputstream.h>
#else
#include <io.h>
#endif
@ -150,6 +148,55 @@ write_to_fds (int argc, char **argv)
return 0;
}
static int
read_from_fd (int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd;
const char expected_result[] = "Yay success!";
guint8 buf[sizeof (expected_result) + 1];
gsize bytes_read;
FILE *f;
if (argc != 3)
{
g_print ("Usage: %s read-from-fd FD\n", argv[0]);
return 1;
}
fd = atoi (argv[2]);
if (fd == 0)
{
g_warning ("Argument \"%s\" does not look like a valid nonzero file descriptor", argv[2]);
return 1;
}
f = fdopen (fd, "r");
if (f == NULL)
{
g_warning ("Failed to open fd %d: %s", fd, g_strerror (errno));
return 1;
}
bytes_read = fread (buf, 1, sizeof (buf), f);
if (bytes_read != sizeof (expected_result))
{
g_warning ("Read %zu bytes, but expected %zu", bytes_read, sizeof (expected_result));
return 1;
}
if (memcmp (expected_result, buf, sizeof (expected_result)) != 0)
{
buf[sizeof (expected_result)] = '\0';
g_warning ("Expected \"%s\" but read \"%s\"", expected_result, (char *)buf);
return 1;
}
if (fclose (f) == -1)
g_assert_not_reached ();
return 0;
}
static int
env_mode (int argc, char **argv)
{
@ -242,6 +289,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
return sleep_forever_mode (argc, argv);
else if (strcmp (mode, "write-to-fds") == 0)
return write_to_fds (argc, argv);
else if (strcmp (mode, "read-from-fd") == 0)
return read_from_fd (argc, argv);
else if (strcmp (mode, "env") == 0)
return env_mode (argc, argv);
else if (strcmp (mode, "cwd") == 0)

View File

@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <glib-unix.h>
#include <gio/gunixinputstream.h>
#include <gio/gunixoutputstream.h>
#include <gio/gfiledescriptorbased.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@ -1816,6 +1817,146 @@ test_pass_fd_inherit_fds (void)
do_test_pass_fd (G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_INHERIT_FDS, NULL);
}
static void
do_test_fd_conflation (GSubprocessFlags flags,
GSpawnChildSetupFunc child_setup)
{
char success_message[] = "Yay success!";
GError *error = NULL;
GOutputStream *output_stream;
GSubprocessLauncher *launcher;
GSubprocess *proc;
GPtrArray *args;
int unused_pipefds[2];
int pipefds[2];
gsize bytes_written;
gboolean success;
char *fd_str;
/* This test must run in a new process because it is extremely sensitive to
* order of opened fds.
*/
if (!g_test_subprocess ())
{
g_test_trap_subprocess (NULL, 0, G_TEST_SUBPROCESS_INHERIT_STDOUT | G_TEST_SUBPROCESS_INHERIT_STDERR);
g_test_trap_assert_passed ();
return;
}
g_unix_open_pipe (unused_pipefds, FD_CLOEXEC, &error);
g_assert_no_error (error);
g_unix_open_pipe (pipefds, FD_CLOEXEC, &error);
g_assert_no_error (error);
/* The fds should be sequential since we are in a new process. */
g_assert_cmpint (unused_pipefds[0] /* 3 */, ==, unused_pipefds[1] - 1);
g_assert_cmpint (unused_pipefds[1] /* 4 */, ==, pipefds[0] - 1);
g_assert_cmpint (pipefds[0] /* 5 */, ==, pipefds[1] /* 6 */ - 1);
/* Because GSubprocess allows arbitrary remapping of fds, it has to be careful
* to avoid fd conflation issues, e.g. it should properly handle 5 -> 4 and
* 4 -> 5 at the same time. GIO previously attempted to handle this by naively
* dup'ing the source fds, but this was not good enough because it was
* possible that the dup'ed result could still conflict with one of the target
* fds. For example:
*
* source_fd 5 -> target_fd 9, source_fd 3 -> target_fd 7
*
* dup(5) -> dup returns 8
* dup(3) -> dup returns 9
*
* After dup'ing, we wind up with: 8 -> 9, 9 -> 7. That means that after we
* dup2(8, 9), we have clobbered fd 9 before we dup2(9, 7). The end result is
* we have remapped 5 -> 9 as expected, but then remapped 5 -> 7 instead of
* 3 -> 7 as the application intended.
*
* This issue has been fixed in the simplest way possible, by passing a
* minimum fd value when using F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC that is higher than any of the
* target fds, to guarantee all source fds are different than all target fds,
* eliminating any possibility of conflation.
*
* Anyway, that is why we have the unused_pipefds here. We need to open fds in
* a certain order in order to trick older GSubprocess into conflating the
* fds. The primary goal of this test is to ensure this particular conflation
* issue is not reintroduced. See glib#2503.
*
* Be aware this test is necessarily extremely fragile. To reproduce these
* bugs, it relies on internals of gspawn and gmain that will likely change
* in the future, eventually causing this test to no longer test the bugs
* it was originally designed to test. That is OK! If the test fails, at
* least you know *something* is wrong.
*/
launcher = g_subprocess_launcher_new (flags);
g_subprocess_launcher_take_fd (launcher, pipefds[0] /* 5 */, pipefds[1] + 3 /* 9 */);
g_subprocess_launcher_take_fd (launcher, unused_pipefds[0] /* 3 */, pipefds[1] + 1 /* 7 */);
if (child_setup != NULL)
g_subprocess_launcher_set_child_setup (launcher, child_setup, NULL, NULL);
fd_str = g_strdup_printf ("%d", pipefds[1] + 3);
args = get_test_subprocess_args ("read-from-fd", fd_str, NULL);
proc = g_subprocess_launcher_spawnv (launcher, (const gchar * const *) args->pdata, &error);
g_assert_no_error (error);
g_assert_nonnull (proc);
g_ptr_array_free (args, TRUE);
g_object_unref (launcher);
g_free (fd_str);
/* Close the read ends of the pipes. */
close (unused_pipefds[0]);
close (pipefds[0]);
/* Also close the write end of the unused pipe. */
close (unused_pipefds[1]);
/* So now pipefds[0] should be inherited into the subprocess as
* pipefds[1] + 2, and unused_pipefds[0] should be inherited as
* pipefds[1] + 1. We will write to pipefds[1] and the subprocess will verify
* that it reads the expected data. But older broken GIO will accidentally
* clobber pipefds[1] + 2 with pipefds[1] + 1! This will cause the subprocess
* to hang trying to read from the wrong pipe.
*/
output_stream = g_unix_output_stream_new (pipefds[1], TRUE);
success = g_output_stream_write_all (output_stream,
success_message, sizeof (success_message),
&bytes_written,
NULL,
&error);
g_assert_no_error (error);
g_assert_cmpint (bytes_written, ==, sizeof (success_message));
g_assert_true (success);
g_object_unref (output_stream);
success = g_subprocess_wait_check (proc, NULL, &error);
g_assert_no_error (error);
g_object_unref (proc);
}
static void
test_fd_conflation (void)
{
do_test_fd_conflation (G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_NONE, NULL);
}
static void
test_fd_conflation_empty_child_setup (void)
{
/* Using a child setup function forces gspawn to use fork/exec
* rather than posix_spawn.
*/
do_test_fd_conflation (G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_NONE, empty_child_setup);
}
static void
test_fd_conflation_inherit_fds (void)
{
/* Try to test the optimized posix_spawn codepath instead of
* fork/exec. Currently this requires using INHERIT_FDS since gspawn's
* posix_spawn codepath does not currently handle closing
* non-inherited fds.
*/
do_test_fd_conflation (G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_INHERIT_FDS, NULL);
}
#endif
static void
@ -1956,6 +2097,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/pass-fd/basic", test_pass_fd);
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/pass-fd/empty-child-setup", test_pass_fd_empty_child_setup);
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/pass-fd/inherit-fds", test_pass_fd_inherit_fds);
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/fd-conflation/basic", test_fd_conflation);
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/fd-conflation/empty-child-setup", test_fd_conflation_empty_child_setup);
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/fd-conflation/inherit-fds", test_fd_conflation_inherit_fds);
#endif
g_test_add_func ("/gsubprocess/launcher-environment", test_launcher_environment);