The xdg portal, since version 2, allows to set a special button purpose
for inline text responses.
We can serialize the `response action for text` (added in a
previous commit) into a button button with the correct purpose.
Some platforms support inline text responses e.g. xdg portal since
version 2. This allows apps to specify an action that will be called
when the user submits text from the notification.
The portal backend for notifications didn't have any tests this adds
add least some. This also adjusts the mock notification server used to
test the GTK backend to allow to test the portal as well.
This is similar to categories but for buttons. This allows apps to
specify what a button does so that the notification server can present
it specially.
This adds a number of standardized categories, which should help the user
to pick the correct one. It also improves the wording of the
documentation for categories.
The `markup_body` takes precedence over `body`, if the platform supports
markup. If `body` isn't set then `markup_body` stripped of
markup is used on platforms that don't support markup.
This behavior doesn't break existing apps or backends.
Allow applications to specify whether a sound should be played
when it is shown. And allow setting custom sound.
The default behavior is to not play any sound, in order to not break current
apps that play the sound themself.
The notification portal v2 accepts a sealable `memfd`. We can load
`GBytesIcon` and `GLoadableIcon` into a `memfd` automatically. For version 1
of the portal we can load `GLoadableIcon` into a `GBytesIcon` to
increase support for more `GIcon` formats.
This doesn't include `GEmblemedIcon` it's likely that it will be
deprecated soon https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3544
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3108
Version 2 of the portal has a lot of additional features but we need to
check the version before sending new properties because version 1 would
fail with the new properties. New properties are added in a future commit.
The portal and GTK notifications will diverge, since they follow
different specs. For now it wasn't a problem since the portal was
strongly limited and essentially the same as the org.gtk.Notifications
interface. The serialization code is mostly the same as the already existing
serialization code.
The documentation for g_spawn_async_with_pipes_and_fds() states:
> If an error occurs, child_pid, stdin_pipe_out, stdout_pipe_out, and
> stderr_pipe_out will not be filled with valid values.
Before 2dc3a6f0c80e5a8f786369eee0c45bfe19b55f4f, the `child_pid`
argument was `self->pid`, and GObject zero-initializes structs. So
the pid field was properly initialized to zero.
After 2dc3a6f0c80e5a8f786369eee0c45bfe19b55f4f, however, the out
variable is now declared inside initable_init(), and it's unitialized.
So if g_spawn_async_with_pipes_and_fds() errors out, `pid` will have
trash value in it, and the following assertion will fail:
```
g_assert (success == (pid != 0));
```
Fix that by initializing the `pid` variable to zero. Add a test to
exercise the fail code path, and prevent errors like this in the
future.
The process PID is initialized by the initable vfunc, while
g_subprocess_exited sets it again, when we're protecting it via a lock.
The status is set when the process exits instead, again while locking.
This makes the thread sanitizer unhappy (even if it shouldn't really be
a race for the PID init case), but still locking during initialization is
not a bad thing to do.
At the same time g_subprocess_wait() and friends were using the pid and status
values without any protection, so let's ensure this is not the case anymore.
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=8213)
Write of size 4 at 0x7b200000084c by thread T1:
#0 g_subprocess_exited ../gio/gsubprocess.c:284
#1 g_child_watch_dispatch ../glib/gmain.c:5963
#2 g_main_dispatch ../glib/gmain.c:3373
#3 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked ../glib/gmain.c:4224
#4 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked ../glib/gmain.c:4289
#5 g_main_context_iteration ../glib/gmain.c:4354
#6 glib_worker_main ../glib/gmain.c:6553
#7 g_thread_proxy ../glib/gthread.c:892
Previous read of size 4 at 0x7b200000084c by main thread:
#0 g_subprocess_wait ../gio/gsubprocess.c:908
#1 g_subprocess_wait_check ../gio/gsubprocess.c:939
#2 end_element ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:342
#3 emit_end_element ../glib/gmarkup.c:1045
#4 g_markup_parse_context_parse ../glib/gmarkup.c:1603
#5 parse_resource_file ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:578
#6 main ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:967
Location is heap block of size 120 at 0x7b2000000800 allocated by main
thread:
#0 calloc <null>
#1 g_malloc0 ../glib/gmem.c:133
#2 g_type_create_instance ../gobject/gtype.c:1933
#3 g_object_new_internal ../gobject/gobject.c:2621
#4 g_object_new_valist ../gobject/gobject.c:2960
#5 g_initable_new_valist ../gio/ginitable.c:245
#6 g_initable_new ../gio/ginitable.c:163
#7 g_subprocess_newv ../gio/gsubprocess.c:619
#8 g_subprocess_new ../gio/gsubprocess.c:590
#9 end_element ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:334
#10 emit_end_element ../glib/gmarkup.c:1045
#11 g_markup_parse_context_parse ../glib/gmarkup.c:1603
#12 parse_resource_file ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:578
#13 main ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:967
Thread T1 'gmain' (tid=8228, running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null>
#1 g_system_thread_new ../glib/gthread-posix.c:762
#2 g_thread_new_internal ../glib/gthread.c:996
#3 g_thread_new ../glib/gthread.c:949
#4 g_get_worker_context ../glib/gmain.c:6580
#5 initable_init ../gio/gsubprocess.c:443
#6 g_initable_init ../gio/ginitable.c:129
#7 g_initable_new_valist ../gio/ginitable.c:249
#8 g_initable_new ../gio/ginitable.c:163
#9 g_subprocess_newv ../gio/gsubprocess.c:619
#10 g_subprocess_new ../gio/gsubprocess.c:590
#11 end_element ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:334
#12 emit_end_element ../glib/gmarkup.c:1045
#13 g_markup_parse_context_parse ../glib/gmarkup.c:1603
#14 parse_resource_file ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:578
#15 main ../gio/glib-compile-resources.c:967
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race ../gio/gsubprocess.c:284 in
g_subprocess_exited
======================================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=15959)
Read of size 4 at 0x7b200000084c by main thread:
#0 g_subprocess_wait ../gio/gsubprocess.c:913
#1 g_subprocess_wait_check ../gio/gsubprocess.c:944
#2 test_cat_utf8 ../gio/tests/gsubprocess.c:489
#3 test_case_run ../glib/gtestutils.c:3115
#4 g_test_run_suite_internal ../glib/gtestutils.c:3210
#5 g_test_run_suite_internal ../glib/gtestutils.c:3229
#6 g_test_run_suite ../glib/gtestutils.c:3310
#7 g_test_run ../glib/gtestutils.c:2379
#8 main ../gio/tests/gsubprocess.c:2266
Previous write of size 4 at 0x7b200000084c by thread T1:
#0 g_subprocess_exited ../gio/gsubprocess.c:284
#1 g_child_watch_dispatch ../glib/gmain.c:5963
#2 g_main_dispatch ../glib/gmain.c:3373
#3 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked ../glib/gmain.c:4224
#4 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked ../glib/gmain.c:4289
#5 g_main_context_iteration ../glib/gmain.c:4354
#6 glib_worker_main ../glib/gmain.c:6553
#7 g_thread_proxy ../glib/gthread.c:892
This is a minor performance improvement, since the pspec list for the
class now only has to be modified once, rather than twice.
It also means we now have the `GParamSpec` pointers to hand in a `props`
array, which will be used in the upcoming commits.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
This lets the compiler tell us if we’ve accidentally missed a property
implementation from `get_property()` or `set_property()`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
As per previous commit we used atomic logic to handle the cancellation,
but that lead to a slightly different behavior because the file monitor
was then marked as cancelled before the vfunc implementation was called.
Use similar behavior now (by still relying on the atomic logic), by
marking the state as about-to-cancel as soon as we're starting the
cancellation (preventing other threads to cancel it), and eventually
fully marking it as cancelled.
The cancelled state may be set and read by different threads, so ensure
that it's stored and managed in an atomic way.
We could in fact end up check for `g_file_monitor_is_cancelled()` in a
thread and `g_file_monitor_cancel()` or `g_file_monitor_emit_event` in
in another one.
Adding some initial test for the compiler behavior and its expected
output.
Also, when using sanitizers we want to be able to test the compiler memory
management.
We were reusing the same logic everywhere, while we can just reuse an
unique class to base our tests on that avoids having to copy-and-paste
code for no good reason
Add some basic support for having glib-tests-only python libraries that
can be shared across the various projects, so that we don't have to
maintain multiple copies of them.
