This supports a subset of ISO 8601 since that is a commonly used standard for
storing date and time information. We support only ISO 8601 strings that contain
full date and time information as this would otherwise not map to GDateTime.
This subset includes all of RFC 3339 which is commonly used on the Internet and
the week and ordinal day formats as these are supported in the GDateTime APIs.
(Minor modification by Philip Withnall to change API versions from 2.54
to 2.56.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753459
Make it a bit more obvious when the DTLS methods aren’t implemented by a
particular TLS backend; return an invalid type rather than crashing.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752240
This was duplicated also in g_object_interface_install_property().
Now, validations specific to classes happen in
validate_and_install_class_property() - specifically, the checks for
the presence of the get_property() and set_property() methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787551
In the Dictionary section of the gvariant-format-strings documentation
only how to construct a dictionary is shown.
Add a small example showing how to extract data from a nested dictionary
and specifically from a GVariant of type "(oa{sa{sv})". Move also the
Dictionary section after the GVariant * section for the sake of clarity.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786737
Instead of a full reference, which causes problems for clients that
expect a GSettings instance to stop firing signals once they drop the
last reference.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780861
Explain the default values of _{get,set}_close_on_unref() in the main
description rather than the argument one, link to the GIOChannel
structure when talking about it, and mention the default value of
"close on unref" in g_io_channel_unix_new().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787123
Valgrind will check that the third argument to ioctl() is a valid
pointer, but some ioctls interpret that argument as an integer, and that
is the case here (it's a file descriptor), so this is a false positive.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787109
Commit 31ae2c5598 added the C++ guards
around all prototypes, including inside the header file. The header
file, though, already has C++ guards, so while it's harmless to have
them there, it's also unnecessary.
We should only emit C++ guards around the prototypes we include in the
generated source.
See bug #786456 for a detailed analysis of the situation which can cause
this (in summary, if a g_subprocess_wait_async() call is cancelled on a
GSubprocess which is already known to be dead).
The problem was that the GCancellable callback handler was
unconditionally returning a result for the GTask for
g_subprocess_wait_async(), even if that GTask had already returned a
result and the callback was being invoked after the GTask had been
removed from the pending_waits list.
Fix that by checking whether the GTask is still in the pending_waits
list before returning a result for it.
Thanks to Will Thompson for some very useful unit tests which reproduce
this (which will be pushed in the following commit).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786456
