This will not catch the case where we fail in libffi and always use 0.
In fact, be a real annoying person and use (1 << 31) as a flags value to
test signedness, too.
Also update the testcase to actually use flags everywhere and ot uint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754882
We don't need to run binaries we just built in order to successfully
build GLib and friends any more.
Since commit b74e2a7, we don't need to run glib-genmarshal when building
GIO; since commit f9eb9eed, all our tests (including the ones that do
need to run binaries we just built) are only built when running "make
check", instead of unconditionally at every build.
This means that we don't need to check for existing, native binaries
when cross-compiling, and fail the configuration step if they are not
found — which also means that you don't need to natively build GLib for
your toolchain, in order to cross-compile GLib.
We can also use the cross-compilation conditional, and skip those tests
that require a binary we just built in order to build.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753745
This test checks the performance of connecting, disconnecting and
blocking many handlers. Various cases are checked: disconnect in
the same order, in the inverse order, at random. Connect to one
signal on a single object, to two signals on the same object, or
to the same signal on two different objects.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737009
I searched all files that mention g_test_run, and replaced most
g_print() calls. This avoids interfering with TAP. Exceptions:
* gio/tests/network-monitor: a manual mode that is run by
"./network-monitor --watch" is unaffected
* glib/gtester.c: not a test
* glib/gtestutils.c: not a test
* glib/tests/logging.c: specifically exercising g_print()
* glib/tests/markup-parse.c: a manual mode that is run by
"./markup-parse --cdata-as-text" is unaffected
* glib/tests/testing.c: specifically exercising capture of stdout
in subprocesses
* glib/tests/utils.c: captures a subprocess's stdout
* glib/tests/testglib.c: exercises an assertion failure in g_print()
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725981
Reviewed-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
Along the same lines as g_clear_object(), g_set_object() is a
convenience function to update a GObject pointer, handling reference
counting transparently and correctly.
Specifically, it handles the case where a pointer is set to its current
value. If handled naïvely, that could result in the object instance
being finalised. In the following code, that happens when
(my_obj == new_value) and the object has a single reference:
g_clear_object (&my_obj);
my_obj = g_object_ref (new_value);
It also simplifies boilerplate code such as set_property()
implementations, which are otherwise long and boring.
Test cases included.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741589
Although returning NULL from constructor is strongly discouraged, some
old libraries need to keep doing it for ABI-compatibility reasons.
Given this, it's rude to forbid finalization from within
constructor(), since it would otherwise work correctly now anyway (and
the critical when returning NULL should discourage any new uses of
returning NULL from constructor()).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661576
Take this test out of 'make check'. It's causing problems for a lot of people
due to fact that it's essentially a forkbomb. It's causing failures for Debian
on ARM and it's DoSing coredumps to system crash collectors.
The conditional only covers registration of the master, not the
subprocess parts. This is because g_test_slow() always return FALSE in
the subprocesses, so they would fail to run if we didn't register them
unconditionally.
This is the sole piece of code in GLib where we make use of the
stack growing direction. And this test proves that we have been
getting the direction wrong all these years...
If a constructor() implementation created an object but then unreffed
it rather than returning it, that object would get left on the
construction_objects list, which would cause problems later when that
memory location got reused by another object.
"Fix" this by making it fail intentionally, and add a test for it (and
for the normal, working singleton case).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661576
GBindingTransformFunc called its arguments "source_value" and
"target_value", but in the transform_from function of a bidirectional
binding, "source_value" comes from the target object, and
"target_value" comes from the source object, which quickly gets
confusing if you need to use g_binding_get_source(), etc, in the
function.
Of course developers can call their transform function arguments
whatever they want, but many will copy from the headers/docs to start
out, so use less confusing names here ("from_value" and "to_value").
Also, fix the documentation to describe the bidirectional case
correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709440
Convert {glib,gobject,gio}/tests to use the automake TAP driver
and test harness instead of gtester. To do so, we add a glib-tap.mk
that provides the same interface as glib.mk, except for the
reporting and coverage testing functionality. Eventually, we may
want to replace glib.mk with it. I've not yet converted the
toplevel tests/ directory, since it mixes gtestutils tests with
other binaries.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692125
Just like g_object_notify, check for a zero ref_count in
g_object_notify_by_pspec and leave if it is 0.
This allows using functions in ->finalize() that possibly also
notify a property change on the object. Previously,
this resulted in an error from g_object_ref.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705570
Otherwise in e.g. the gnome-ostree integrationtest system, we
end up sending SIGUSR1 to the *entire session*, which triggers
various badness in untested debugging paths from gnome-session.
This test worked when compiled without optimization, but fails with
-O2. Presumably we just happened to find the GMainLoop off the stack
somewhere.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704267
As it turns out, we have examples of internal functions called
type_name_get_private() in the wild (especially among older libraries),
so we need to use a name for the per-instance private data getter
function that hopefully won't conflict with anything.
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
The automatic memory management of GBinding is not optimal for high
order languages with garbage collectors semantics. If we leave the
binding instance inert but still referenced it will be leaked, so one
solution that does not throw away the baby of C convenience with the
bathwater of language bindability is to have unbind() perform an
implicit unref().
Hopefully, C developers will read the documentation and especially the
note that says that after calling unbind() the reference count on the
GBinding instance is decreased.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698018
Perform a substantial cleanup of the build system with respect to
building and installing testcases.
First, Makefile.decl has been renamed glib.mk and substantially
expanded. We intend to add more stuff here in the future, like canned
rules for mkenums, marshallers, resources, etc.
By default, tests are no longer compiled as part of 'make'. They will
be built when 'make check' is run. The old behaviour can be obtained
with --enable-always-build-tests.
--disable-modular-tests is gone (because tests are no longer built by
default). There is no longer any way to cause 'make check' to be a
no-op, but that's not very useful anyway.
A new glibtests.m4 file is introduced. Along with glib.mk, this
provides for consistent handling of --enable-installed-tests and
--enable-always-build-tests (mentioned above).
Port our various test-installing Makefiles to the new framework.
This patch substantially improves the situation in the toplevel tests/
directory. Things are now somewhat under control there. There were
some tests being built that weren't even being run and we run those now.
The long-running GObject performance tests in this directory have been
removed from 'make check' because they take too long.
As an experiment, 'make check' now runs the testcases on win32 builds,
by default. We can't run them under gtester (since it uses a pipe to
communicate with the subprocess) so just toss them in TESTS. Most of
them are passing on win32.
Things are not quite done here, but this patch is already a substantial
improvement. More to come.
Higher order languages with garbage collection can have issues releasing
a binding, as they do not control the last reference being dropped on
the binding, source, or target instances.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698018
The way of getting the default value out of a GParamSpec is to allocate
a GValue, initialise it, then call g_param_spec_set_default() to set the
default value into that GValue.
This is exactly how we handle setting the default value for all of the
construct properties that were not explicitly passed to g_object_new().
Instead of doing the alloc/init/store on all construct properties on
every call to g_object_new(), we can cache those GValues in the private
data of the GParamSpec itself and reuse them.
This patch does not actually make that change to g_object_new() yet, but
it adds the API to GParamSpec so that a future patch to GObject can make
the change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698056
Some (broken) toolchains for example trip up
-Werror=missing-prototypes in system headers. This patch allows
people to skip the formerly hardcoded "baseline" warnings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694757
Add a check to prevent adding an interface to a class that has already
had its class_init done.
This is an incompatible change but it is suspected that there are not
many users of this functionality. Two known exceptions are pygobject
(fixed in bug 686149) and our own testsuite (affected tests have been
temporarily disabled by this patch).
Once we confirm that nobody else is using this functionality we can
remove a rather large amount of code for dealing with this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687659
Add a check to prevent adding an interface to a class that has already
had its class_init done.
This is an incompatible change but it is suspected that there are not
many users of this functionality. Two known exceptions are pygobject
(fixed in bug 686149) and our own testsuite (affected tests have been
temporarily disabled by this patch).
Once we confirm that nobody else is using this functionality we can
remove a rather large amount of code for dealing with this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687659
Add a check to prevent adding an interface to a class that has already
had its class_init done.
This is an incompatible change but it is suspected that there are not
many users of this functionality. Two known exceptions are pygobject
(fixed in bug 686149) and our own testsuite (affected tests have been
temporarily disabled by this patch).
Once we confirm that nobody else is using this functionality we can
remove a rather large amount of code for dealing with this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687659
Basically due to a combination of va_args semantics around
signed/unsigned ints, this test case fails on ppc64. At the moment,
we have as yet to find any real-world consumer with such a large
enumeration value.
Unfortunately, the possible fixes for this are extremely invasive;
we would have to define a new enum API.
Given both of these facts, we believe it makes the most sense at the
current time to simply not test this. If we at a later time determine
there is such a real-world consumer, we can look at doing the
necessary fixes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686662
Very many testcases, some GLib tools (resource compiler, etc) and
GApplication were calling g_type_init().
Remove those uses, as they are no longer required.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686161
If the closure is invalidated we drop the ref on the signal handler
node, but if the signal is currently being dispatched, the ref could be
held elsewhere.
Flag that we no longer have an outstanding invalidation handler so that
we don't try to unregister ourselves when the other ref drops.
Add a testcase that catches this situation.
The ability to cross-compile glib got broken after the
merge of the 'signal-performance' branch as the assumption
was made that the generated glib-genmarshal can be executed
on the host (which isn't valid when cross-compiling).
Fixed this by using the just-built glib-genmarshal for normal
compilations and the native (host) glib-genmarshal when doing a
cross-compilation as was also done in several other areas of GLib
Tested for host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
and host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, target=i686-w64-mingw32
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671676
Transforming a GValue holding flags from a GFlagsValue set that includes the 0
value (no flag bits set) into a string would loop until exhausting all the
available memory.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670557
The GValueArray type was added in a time, during the Jurassic era or so,
when GArray did not have a representable GType. The GValueArray API has
various issues as well:
- it doesn't match the other GLib array types;
- it is not reference counted;
- the structure is fully exposed on the stack, so it cannot be
extended to add reference counting;
- it cannot be forcibly resized.
The nice thing is that now we have a GArray type that can replace in
full GValueArray, so we can deprecate the latter, and reduce the
complexity in GLib, application code, and bindings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667228
Some of the GLib tests deliberately provoke warnings (or even fatal
errors) in a forked child. Normally, this is fine, but under valgrind
it's somewhat undesirable. We do want to follow fork(), so we can check
for leaks in child processes that exit gracefully; but we don't want to
be told about "leaks" in processes that are crashing, because there'd
be no point in cleaning those up anyway.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666116
We were previously preventing implementations of an interface from
specifying G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT for a property of that interface if the
interface didn't specify it itself (or was readonly).
This is something that should only interest the implementation, so we
remove this restriction.
This allows 6 new possible override scenarios:
- writable -> writable/construct
- writable -> readwrite/construct
- readwrite -> readwrite/construct
- writable/construct-only -> writable/construct
- writable/construct-only -> readwrite/construct
- readwrite/construct-only -> readwrite/construct
and we update the testcase to reflect this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666616
Add a testcase to check all possibilities for overriding a property
specified on an interface from an implementation of that interface,
changing the type and flags.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666616
First, some ARM systems are not fast enough to meet the 30 second
deadline in gwakeuptest.c, so increase that to 60.
Second, we have some signed/unsigned woes in the gparam transform tests.
These don't really matter, since it's test code, but they do obscure
real leaks in the library.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666115
Acked-by: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
And remove the 'joinable' argument from g_thread_new() and
g_thread_new_full().
Change the wording in the docs. Clarify expectations for
(deprecated) g_thread_create().
