If a username and password are specified by the caller, `GSocks5Proxy`
tells the server that it supports anonymous *and* username/password
authentication, and the server can choose which it prefers.
Otherwise, `GSocks5Proxy` only says that it supports anonymous
authentication. If that’s not acceptable to the server, the code was
previously returning `G_IO_ERROR_PROXY_AUTH_FAILED`. That error code
doesn’t indicate to the caller that authentication might succeed were
they to provide a username and password.
Change the error handling to make that clearer. A fuller solution would
be to expose more of the method negotiation in the `GSocks5Proxy` API,
so that the caller can specify ahead of time which authentication
methods they want to use. That can follow in issue #2059 though.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1988
clang complains about this in the form of
<source>:6:9: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is
unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead)
if (f == (void *)"a") {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Use variables for the strings instead, which should have the same
address.
This will help to debug CI issues that are related to us running in
a container that might have unusual capabilities, mount points,
filesystems etc., such as (probably) #2027, #2028, #2029.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Making this validation code public allows projects to validate a
GParamSpec name before creating it. While hard-coded GParamSpec don't
need this, we can't afford crashing the main program for dynamically
generated GParamSpec from user-created data.
In such case, we will need to validate the param names and return errors
instead of trying to create a GParamSpec with invalid names.
Includes modifications from Philip Withnall and Emmanuele Bassi to
rearrange the new function addition and split it into one function for
GParamSpecs and one for GSignals.
`mem-overflow` test disables GCC warning `alloc-size-larger-than` via
diagnostic pragma, but it's still emitted in the linkage stage when
LTO is enabled.
This changes explicitly set `link_args` for the test to disable the
warning.
They were not actually asynchronous, and hence caused blocking in the
main thread. Deleting them means the default implementation of those
vfuncs is used, which runs the sync implementation in a thread — which
is what is wanted here.
Spotted by Benjamin Otte.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #2051
There’s a minor race condition between cancellation of a `GCancellable`,
and disposal/finalisation of a `GCancellableSource` in another thread.
Thread A Thread B
g_cancellable_cancel(C)
→cancellable_source_cancelled(C, S)
g_source_unref(S)
cancellable_source_dispose(S)
→→g_source_ref(S)
→→# S is invalid at this point; crash
Thankfully, the `GCancellable` sets `cancelled_running` while it’s
emitting the `cancelled` signal, so if `cancellable_source_dispose()` is
called while that’s high, we know that the thread which is doing the
cancellation has already started (or is committed to starting) calling
`cancellable_source_cancelled()`.
Fix the race by resurrecting the `GCancellableSource` in
`cancellable_source_dispose()`, and signalling this using
`GCancellableSource.resurrected_during_cancellation`. Check for that
flag in `cancellable_source_cancelled()` and ignore cancellation if it’s
set.
The modifications to `resurrected_during_cancellation` and the
cancellable source’s refcount have to be done with `cancellable_mutex`
held so that they are seen atomically by each thread. This should not
affect performance too much, as it only happens during cancellation or
disposal of a `GCancellableSource`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1841
`g_assert()` is compiled out if `G_DISABLE_ASSERT` is defined, and
`g_assert_*()` gives more detailed failure messages.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Guard against NULL type being passed to
g_content_type_get_generic_icon_name() just as we protect
g_content_type_get_description(), otherwise it will cause a crash.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/2482
Distributions will likely want to update GLib before
GObject-Introspection, to avoid circular dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Some compilers have __GNUC__ defined as a value less than 6, but do
support implicit-fallthrough via __attribute__((fallthrough)). Define
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH for those that support __has_attribute.
