"Uninitialized value" is partially correct, since it has not been
initialized with a type, but it's more precise to say
"zero-initialized value". It is still a programming error to pass a
pointer to uninitialized memory with arbitrary contents as the value.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Using the generic marshaller has drawbacks beyond performance. One such
drawback is that it breaks the stack unwinding from the Linux kernel due
to having unsufficient data to walk past ffi_call_unixt64. That means that
performance profiling by application developers looks grouped among
seemingly unrelated code paths.
Related to GNOME/Initiatives#10
We already have the GType with which the GValue should be initialized,
so requiring an initialized GValue is not really necessary, and it
actually complicates code that wraps GObject, by requiring the retrieval
of the GParamSpec in order to get the property type. Additionally, it
introduces a mostly unnecessary g_value_reset().
We already changed g_object_getv() to allow passing uninitialized
GValues, but this fell through the cracks.
Closes: #737
These have all been documented as deprecated for a long time, but we’ve
never had a way to programmatically mark them as deprecated. Do that
now.
This is based on the list of deprecations from the reverted commit
80fcb1bc2.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #638
g_object_set_data() should only ever be used with a small, bounded set
of keys, or the memory usage of the quark lookup table will grow
unbounded. Document that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #682
I'm trying to use `-fsanitize=thread` for OSTree, and some of
these issues seem to go into GLib. Also, the sanitizers work better if
the userspace libraries are built with them too.
This fix is similar to
b6814bb37c
Mixing atomic and non-atomic reads trips TSAN, so let's change the
assertions to operate on the local values returned from atomic
read/writes.
Without this change I couldn't even *build* GLib with TSAN, since we
use gresources during compilation, which uses GSubprocess, which hits
this code.
(Minor review fixes made by Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>.)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1224
An assertion is harder to skip over, and using a g_critical() can give
us a more informative error message.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/179
The implementation is silently discarding this anyway, and
g_object_unref() is using atomic operations. So this should be safe.
Having this here triggers -Wdiscarded-qualifiers when g_clear_pointer()
is fixed to use __typeof__().
The implementation is silently discarding this anyway, and
g_object_unref() is using atomic operations. So this should be safe.
Having this here triggers -Wdiscarded-qualifiers when g_clear_pointer()
is fixed to use __typeof__().
There is no transfer annotation that can express transfer semantics of
g_object_new_with_properties in general. When GInitiallyUnowned object
is constructed the introspection data will be incorrect.
Mark it with skip annotation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795025
Currently, g_object_ref() and g_object_ref_sink() return a
gpointer which can mask issues when assigning to fields or
returning from a function.
To help catch these type of programming errors, we can propagate
the type of the parameter through the function call on GCC
using the typeof() C language extension.
This will cause offending code to have a warning, but will
continue to be source and binary compatible.
This is only enabled when GLIB_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED is 2.56 or greater.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790697
Where we were already treating GHashTables as sets, modify them to use
the set-specific APIs g_hash_table_add() and g_hash_table_contains(), to
make that usage more obvious and less prone to being broken.
Heavily based on patches by Garrett Regier <garrettregier@gmail.com>.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749371
This was duplicated also in g_object_interface_install_property().
Now, validations specific to classes happen in
validate_and_install_class_property() - specifically, the checks for
the presence of the get_property() and set_property() methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787551
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
This is going to be checked again by g_object_new_with_properties()
and g_object_new_valist() anyway, so might just as well leave it
to those functions to do the check and only do it once. It doesn't
matter which function emits the critical warning in the end either,
as one has to look at a stack trace to find out what code triggered
it in any case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780908
g_object_newv uses a GParameter as argument. Since GParameter
is deprecated due to this type is not introspectible,
g_object_newv is deprecated now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
g_object_new_with_properties is an alternative to g_object_newv.
The last one, takes an array of GParameter. However, GParameter
is a rarely used type and this type is not introspectible, so
it will not work properly in bindings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
