The code section guarded with toggle_refs_mutex includes a call to
g_object_unref(), which may call toggle_refs_notify(). As the latter
tries to acquire the same mutex, glib locks up.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632884
Previously, dumping a GValue holding a GStrv just yielded "((GStrv *)
0xDEADBEEF)". I think it'd be more useful to dump a Python list-style
representation of the GStrv's contents, if it's not NULL.
Fixes: <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629192>
Since we added g_object_notify_by_pspec(), an efficient way to install
and notify properties relies on storing the GParamSpec pointers inside
a static arrays, like we do for signal identifiers.
Instead of multiple calls to g_object_class_install_property(), we
should have a single function to take the static array of GParamSpecs
and iterate it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626919
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com>
This should fix bug #628952.
Don't include glib/gdatasetprivate.h directly. Especially don't define
GLIB_COMPILATION when doing that, as that causes breakage on Windows
because of the variable dllimport/dllexport stuff in gtypes.h that
checks GLIB_COMPILATION. That macro really should be defined only when
compiling code that goes into the libglib DLL. Otherwise the compiler
thinks that variables that should be imported from libglib are
actually defined in the code being compiled.
Just call g_atomic_pointer_get() as such, don't bother with
G_DATALIST_GET_FLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
The gdatasetprivate.h header includes gatomic.h directly. It all works
well in GLib, but inside GObject it will trigger the single inclusion
guard.
Since this is a private header, and it's kind of a special case, one way
to fix it is to declare GLIB_COMPILATION around it and fool the single
inclusion guard in gatomic.h into thinking we're compiling GLib and not
GObject.
g_object_class_list_properties tries to sort the returned list of
paramspecs by 'type depth' and param_id. But all the overridden
interface properties have a param_id of 0, so they come out in
a random order.
Bug 628253.
The previous code dedup'd when thawing and threw nasty warnings your way
if you notified too often. This can now easily be avoided.
Performance should be roughly identical, as both are O(n²).
The g_object_bind_property_with_closures() function should set a
marshaller if the two GClosures don't have one already. This simplifies
the caller code and avoids duplication.
We need to add a new marshaller to the gmarshal.list matching the
signature of the GBindingTransformFunc function.
Since GSettings got the same functionality and flag in commit ca3b7b75b
GBinding should also have the ability to automatically invert a boolean
value without requiring a custom transformation function.
Since using the function pointer version muddles the memory management
requirements of language bindings, we should implement a GClosure-based
variant on top of g_object_bind_property_full().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622278
This reverts commit 0201a81f04 and adds
locks in the right place.
As this file is a public header (see last commit), we cannot just remove
functions from it.
gobjectnotifyqueue.c is a public header, so we cannot remove files from
it. (Yes you read that right, this .c file is a public header. See your
installation directory.)
Adds locking around object property change notification handling. The
notifications are only emitted after all threads have called
g_object_thaw_notify().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166020
You can pass a NULL GValue * to any of g_value_array_insert, _prepend or
_append to add a new, uninitialized value. This is a very useful
shortcut, and it should be documented rather than left languishing in a
comment in the implementation.
Fixes Gnome bug #552363.
When creating a binding between two object properties we might want to
automatically synchronize the two values at the moment of the binding
creation, instead of waiting for the next change.
The G_BINDING_SYNC_CREATE flag does exactly what it says on the tin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622281
