It was checking for the main SOCKS5 version number, rather than the
subnegotiation version number. The username/password authentication
protocol is described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1929.
Spotted and diagnosed by lovetox.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1986
If a username and password are specified by the caller, `GSocks5Proxy`
tells the server that it supports anonymous *and* username/password
authentication, and the server can choose which it prefers.
Otherwise, `GSocks5Proxy` only says that it supports anonymous
authentication. If that’s not acceptable to the server, the code was
previously returning `G_IO_ERROR_PROXY_AUTH_FAILED`. That error code
doesn’t indicate to the caller that authentication might succeed were
they to provide a username and password.
Change the error handling to make that clearer. A fuller solution would
be to expose more of the method negotiation in the `GSocks5Proxy` API,
so that the caller can specify ahead of time which authentication
methods they want to use. That can follow in issue #2059 though.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1988
Distributions will likely want to update GLib before
GObject-Introspection, to avoid circular dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Guard against NULL type being passed to
g_content_type_get_generic_icon_name() just as we protect
g_content_type_get_description(), otherwise it will cause a crash.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/2482
Spotted by Mohammed Sadiq. `g_array_copy()` was doing a `memcpy()` of
the data from the old array to the new one, based on the reserved
elements in the old array (`array->alloc`). However, the new array was
allocated based on the *assigned* elements in the old array
(`array->len`).
So if the old array had fewer assigned elements than allocated elements,
`memcpy()` would fall off the end of the newly allocated data block.
This was particularly obvious when the old array had no assigned
elements, as the new array’s data pointer would be `NULL`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #2049
Most of these scripts can probably just be deleted (see issue #2045),
but for now it was easier to just mechanically fix the shellcheck
warnings in them, rather than think about whether we actually needed the
script.
Fixes done using shellcheck 0.7.0 with default options. I haven’t tested
any of the changes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
I haven’t tested any of them. This is entirely mechanical. I used
shellcheck 0.7.0 with default options.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Spotted by Daniel Stone: the addition of the `echo` commands in commit
65541f1ad meant that the exit status from `clang-format-diff.py` was
being lost.
The incorrect use of `set +e` rather than `set -e` meant that
intermediate commands could fail without the failure being noticed.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Clang warns about string+int not appending to the string (to try and
catch newbie mistakes). While this test didn’t expect that to happen, it
was substituting the same constant string in multiple places for no good
reason. Switch to a single static const string, which should also fix
the compiler warning.
We have to define the string length since it’s used in various
stack-allocated array lengths. This is the easiest fix without more
major refactoring of the test to be less 90s.
Also make things a bit more static.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
We're using Meson for GLib itself, and we recommend people to use it
for their own projects, so it would be good to have our documentation
present examples on how to use Meson with our tools.
We're using Meson for GLib itself, and we recommend people to use it
for their own projects, so it would be good to have our documentation
present examples on how to use Meson with our tools.
Let's move the template example into its own section while we're at it,
since it's referenced by both Meson and Autotools examples.
Fixes: #1783
When running under CI, each iteration takes so long that the total test
time is around 200s. If the CI runner is highly loaded, this can tip it
over the timeout of 360s.
Reduce the iteration counts unless running the test thoroughly.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Helps: #1515
Currently the test waits for 1s before deciding that a refcount has been
leaked. But slow test machines might take longer than that between
scheduling different threads to sort out the refcount, so increase the
timeout.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Helps: #1515
