This will catch buggy implementations of GProxyResolver before they are
able to return bogus results to higher level code. In particular, if
g_proxy_resolver_lookup() returns NULL, it'd better set an error to
explain why.
It doesn't make sense for a proxy resolver to return NULL without an
error on the first call. Whereas a DNS resolver would do this to
indicate that a query completed successfully but found no results, a
proxy resolver should return "direct://" instead. Therefore, if we are
going to return NULL, we ought to have an error as well. Let's make sure
this actually happens by adding some fallback errors just in case
GProxyResolver feeds us weird results.
Additionally, we should not return any errors except
G_IO_ERROR_CANCELLED after the very first iteration. This is an API
contract of GSocketAddressEnumerator. Let's add some checks to ensure
this.
Note that we have inadequate test coverage for GProxyAddressEnumerator.
It's tested here only via GSocketClient. We could do a bit better by
testing it directly as well. For example, I've added tests to see what
happens when GProxyResolver returns both a valid and an invalid URI, but
it's not so interesting here because GSocketClient always uses the valid
result and ignores the error from GProxyAddressEnumerator.
Fixes#2597
This has no practical impact, since it's only a test, and none of the
test code would have hit this bug, but the GTestProxyResolver's check to
see if the URI scheme is simple:// currently only compares the first
four bytes of the string, so it's actually only checking for the "simp"
and would match anything else after that, e.g. "simpleton://". This is
surely not intended.
This is in preparation for porting `GRegex` to libpcre2, which is
happening in !2529. It’s a big port, though, and specially rebuilding
the CI images to add libpcre2 for it is a pain.
Add libpcre2, and then !2529 can drop the old libpcre dependencies when
the port lands.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1085
This will be useful in general, for manually debugging failures if we
need (without having to rebuild the CI images to do so).
It will also be useful for the `assert-msg-test` test, which is being
reworked in !2767.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1434
This was causing intermittent failures on macOS, depending on whether
the tmpdir ended with a `/` or `/some-dir`. `g_strrstr()` is not the
right function to use to extract a basename from a path, for this
reason.
When it failed, the macOS test was failing with:
```
ok 16 /gsubprocess/env
Bail out! GLib-GIO:ERROR:../gio/tests/gsubprocess.c:1507:test_cwd: assertion failed (basename == tmp_lineend_basename): ("/T\n" == "/\n")
```
The test now passes reliably, which means that it can be removed from
the list of expected failures on macOS.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1392
This part of test_non_utf8_printf() was missed while converting other
test expectations to look for a figure space, probably because it is
only run if a legacy ja_JP.eucjp locale exists. Debian generates a fairly
comprehensive set of locales (including some that are non-UTF-8) while
running GLib's installed-tests, so this was caught by CI.
Fixes: 7074122 "gdatetime: Pad numbers with numeric space"
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Creating a `GAppInfo` from a commandline isn’t currently supported on
macOS, but the implementation was incorrectly returning `NULL` without
setting the `GError`.
This was being caught by the new tests in `gio/tests/file.c`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
On macOS the comparison was failing as one of the paths had a trailing
slash while the other didn’t.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
In `g_data_remove_internal()`, call the `GDataElt:destroy` functions in the
order that they appear in `keys`, instead of the order that they are found in
`datalist`.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2672
We used to do get and set atomic operations pair, but these may be
unsafe in some cases as threads may rely on data that is changed in
in between them, however this is not a problem if we do exchange the
pointers.
So just use exchange ops, in this way we can avoid lock/unlock mutex
dances
We can use pointer exchange now to avoid doing two operations to switch
to the new data pointer.
Since we're asserting in case of invalid data, we can just do this check
at later point, without involving any different behavior.
This changes in the unlikely case that G_DISABLE_ASSERT is defined, as in such
case we should undo the operation.
