The modification time test creates a file, gets the modification time in
seconds, then gets the modification time in microseconds and assumes
that the difference between the two has to be above 0.
As rare as this may be, it can happen:
$ stat g-file-info-test-50A450 -c %y
2021-07-06 18:24:56.000000767 +0100
Change the test to simply assert that the difference not negative to
handle this case.
WebKit wants these private key properties to be readable in order to
implement a deserialization function. Currently they are read-only
because at the time GTlsCertificate was originally designed, the plan
was to support PKCS#11-backed private keys: private keys that are stored
on a smartcard, where the private key is completely unreadable. The
design goal was to support both memory-backed and smartcard-backed
private keys with the same GTlsCertificate API, abstracting away the
implementation differences such that code using GTlsCertificate doesn't
need to know the difference.
The original PKCS#11 implementation was never fully baked and at some
point in the past I deleted it all. It has since been replaced with a
new implementation, including a GTlsCertificate:private-key-pkcs11-uri
property, which is readable. So our current API already exposes the
differences between normal private keys and PKCS#11-backed private keys.
The point of making the private-key and private-key-pem properties
write-only was to avoid exposing this difference.
Do we have to make this API function readable? No, because WebKit could
be just as well served if we were to expose serialize and deserialize
functions instead. But WebKit needs to support serializing and
deserializing the non-private portion of GTlsCertificate with older
versions of GLib anyway, so we can do whatever is nicest for GLib. And I
think making this property readable is nicest, since the original design
reason for it to not be readable is now obsolete. The disadvantage to
this approach is that it's now possible for an application to read the
private-key or private-key-pem property, receive NULL, and think "this
certificate must not have a private key," which would be incorrect if
the private-key-pkcs11-uri property is set. That seems like a minor
risk, but it should be documented.
On Unix platforms, wait() and friends yield an integer that encodes
how the process exited. Confusingly, this is usually not the same as
the integer passed to exit() or returned from main(): conceptually it's
an integer encoding of this tagged union:
enum { EXITED, SIGNALLED, ... } tag;
union {
int exit_status; /* if EXITED */
struct {
int terminating_signal;
bool core_dumped;
} terminating_signal; /* if SIGNALLED */
...
} detail;
Meanwhile, on Windows, wait statuses and exit statuses are
interchangeable.
I find that it's clearer what is going on if we are consistent about
referring to the result of wait() as a "wait status", and the value
passed to exit() as an "exit status".
GSubprocess already gets this right: g_subprocess_get_status() returns
the wait status, while g_subprocess_get_exit_status() genuinely returns
the exit status. However, the GSpawn family of APIs has tended to
conflate the two.
Confusingly, g_spawn_check_exit_status() has always checked a wait
status, and it would not be correct to pass an exit status to it; so
let's deprecate it in favour of g_spawn_check_wait_status(), which
does the same thing that g_spawn_check_exit_status() always did.
Code that needs backwards-compatibility with older GLib can use:
#if !GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2, 69, 0)
#define g_spawn_check_wait_status(x) (g_spawn_check_exit_status (x))
#endif
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Confusingly, g_spawn_check_exit_status() takes a wait status, not an
exit status, so passing g_subprocess_get_exit_status() to it is
incorrect (although both encodings happen to use 0 to encode success
and a nonzero value to encode failure, so in practice this probably
had the desired effect).
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Relax the requirement for the test to only be compiled/run under gcc,
since a version of LLVM was released which supports `--add-symbol`.
`objcopy` should be overrideable to be `llvm-objcopy` by using a machine
file as per https://mesonbuild.com/Machine-files.html#binaries.
Suggested and tested by Grigory Vasilyev.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2423
Since commit 87e19535fe, the ETag check when writing out a file through
a symlink (following the symlink) has been incorrectly using the ETag
value of the symlink, rather than the target file. This is incorrect
because the ETag should represent the file content, not its metadata or
links to it.
Fix that, and add a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2417
This changeset exposes
* `not-valid-before`
* `not-valid-after`
* `subject-name`
* `issuer-name`
on GTlsCertificate provided by the underlying TLS Backend.
In order to make use of these changes,
see the related [glib-networking MR][glib-networking].
This change aims to help populate more of the [`Certificate`][wk-cert]
info in the WebKit Inspector Protocol on Linux.
This changeset stems from work in Microsoft Playwright to [add more info
into its HAR capture][pw] generated from the Inspector Protocol events
and will bring feature parity across WebKit platforms.
[wk-cert]: 8afe31a018/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/protocol/Security.json
[pw]: https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/pull/6631
[glib-networking]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib-networking/-/merge_requests/156
Include the base URI in the `g_test_bug()` calls instead. This resolves
inconsistencies between the old bug base (bugzilla.gnome.org) and the
new bug base (gitlab.gnome.org). It also has the advantage that the URI
passed to `g_test_bug()` is now clickable in the code editor, rather
than being split across two locations.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/275#note_303175
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
gio/tests/unix-streams.c: In function ‘test_write_async_wouldblock’:
gio/tests/unix-streams.c:692:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’}
692 | for (i = 0; i < 4 * pipe_capacity; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/unix-streams.c: In function ‘test_writev_async_wouldblock’:
gio/tests/unix-streams.c:780:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’}
780 | for (i = 0; i < 4 * pipe_capacity; i++)
| ^
An application that has been shut down is still marked as registered
even if its implementation has been already destroyed.
This may lead to unguarded crashes when calling functions that have
assumptions for being used with registered applications.
So, when an application is registered, mark it as unregistered just
before destroying its implementation and after being shut down, so that
we follow the registration process in reversed order.
Added tests
gio/tests/socket-common.c: In function ‘socket_address_from_string’:
gio/tests/socket-common.c:50:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
50 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (unix_socket_address_types); i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gnotification-server.c: In function ‘g_notification_server_bus_acquired’:
gio/tests/gnotification-server.c:224:3: error: missing initializer for field ‘padding’ of ‘GDBusInterfaceVTable’ {aka ‘const struct _GDBusInterfaceVTable’}
224 | };
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-proxy.c: In function ‘strv_equal’:
gio/tests/gdbus-proxy.c:158:32: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’}
158 | res = g_strv_length (strv) == count;
| ^~
gio/tests/gsettings.c: In function ‘strv_set_equal’:
gio/tests/gsettings.c:2268:41: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’}
2268 | res = g_strv_length ((gchar**)strv) == count;
| ^~
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:806:1: error: missing initializer for field ‘padding’ of ‘GDBusInterfaceVTable’ {aka ‘const struct _GDBusInterfaceVTable’}
806 | };
| ^
In file included from gio/gio.h:53,
from gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:1:
gdbusconnection.h:395:12: note: ‘padding’ declared here
395 | gpointer padding[8];
| ^~~~~~~
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c: In function ‘handle_method_call’:
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:334:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
334 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:343:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
343 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:352:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
352 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:361:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
361 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:370:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
370 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:379:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
379 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:388:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
388 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:397:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
397 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-testserver.c:406:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
406 | for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
| ^
gio/tests/mimeapps.c: In function ‘strv_equal’:
gio/tests/mimeapps.c:31:32: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’}
31 | res = g_strv_length (strv) == count;
| ^~
gio/tests/proxy-test.c: In function ‘do_echo_test’:
gio/tests/proxy-test.c:855:25: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gssize’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
855 | for (total = 0; total < nwrote; total += nread)
| ^
gio/tests/file.c: In function ‘written_cb’:
gio/tests/file.c:358:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
358 | if (data->pos < strlen (data->data))
| ^
gio/tests/gdbus-test-codegen.c: In function ‘check_object_manager’:
gio/tests/gdbus-test-codegen.c:2344:20: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} and ‘int’
2344 | if (om_signal_id != -1)
| ^~
gio/tests/testfilemonitor.c: In function ‘check_expected_events’:
gio/tests/testfilemonitor.c:124:39: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
124 | for (i = 0, li = 0, l = recorded; i < n_expected && l != NULL;)
| ^
gio/tests/socket.c: In function ‘test_get_available’:
gio/tests/socket.c:1696:53: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gssize’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
1696 | if (g_socket_get_available_bytes (server) > sizeof (data))
| ^
