It’s not feasible to test that the require-same-user flag can cause
authentication to fail, as that would require the build environment to
have two users available. We can, however, test that it passes when
authenticating a client and server running under the same user account.
I have manually tested that the new flag works, by running the following
as user A:
```
`$prefix/gdbus-daemon --print-env &`
gdbus call --session --dest org.freedesktop.DBus --object-path /org/freedesktop/DBus --method org.freedesktop.DBus.ListNames
```
And then running the `gdbus call` command again as user B (with the same
value for `DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS` in the environment), which
produces:
```
Error connecting: Unexpected lack of content trying to read a line
```
(an authentication rejection)
Commenting out the use of
`G_DBUS_SERVER_FLAGS_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRE_SAME_USER` from
`gdbusdaemon.c`, the `gdbus call` command succeeds for both users.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
This doesn’t change the `GDBusDaemon` behaviour, but does simplify the
code a little.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1804
This eliminates a common use case for the
`GDBusAuthObserver::authorize-authenticated-peer` signal, which is often
implemented incorrectly by people.
Suggested by Simon McVittie.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #1804
GByteArray uses guint for storing the length of the byte array, but it
also has a constructor (g_byte_array_new_take) that takes length as a
gsize. gsize may be larger than guint (64 bits for gsize vs 32 bits
for guint). It is possible to call the function with a value greater
than G_MAXUINT, which will result in silent length truncation. This
may happen as a result of unreffing GBytes into GByteArray, so rather
be loud about it.
(Test case tweaked by Philip Withnall.)
These should never have been allowed; they will result in precondition
failures from the `GKeyFile` later on in the code.
A test will be added for this shortly.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fix an effective regression in commit
7781a9cbd2, which happens when
`convert_path()` is called with a `key` which contains no slashes. In
that case, the `key` is entirely the `basename`.
Prior to commit 7781a9cb, the code worked through a fluke of `i == -1`
cancelling out with the various additions in the `g_memdup()` call, and
effectively resulting in `g_strdup (key)`.
Spotted by Guido Berhoerster.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
gio/glib-compile-resources.c: In function ‘parse_resource_file’:
gio/glib-compile-resources.c:553:3: error: missing initializer for field ‘passthrough’ of ‘GMarkupParser’ {aka ‘struct _GMarkupParser’}
553 | GMarkupParser parser = { start_element, end_element, text };
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
gio/gio-tool-tree.c: In function ‘do_tree’:
gio/gio-tool-tree.c:124:22: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’
124 | for (n = 0; n < level; n++)
| ^
gio/gio-tool-tree.c:197:21: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’
197 | for (n = 0; n < level; n++)
| ^
gio/gio-tool.c: In function ‘attribute_flags_to_string’:
gio/gio-tool.c:171:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
171 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (flag_descr); i++)
| ^
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c: In function ‘parse_gschema_files’:
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c:1773:3: error: missing initializer for field ‘passthrough’ of ‘GMarkupParser’ {aka ‘struct _GMarkupParser’}
1773 | GMarkupParser parser = { start_element, end_element, text };
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c: In function ‘main’:
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c:2176:5: error: missing initializer for field ‘arg_description’ of ‘GOptionEntry’ {aka ‘struct _GOptionEntry’}
2176 | { "allow-any-name", 0, 0, G_OPTION_ARG_NONE, &allow_any_name, N_("Do not enforce key name restrictions") },
| ^
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c: In function ‘key_state_set_range’:
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c:376:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
376 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (table); i++)
| ^
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c: In function ‘key_state_serialise’:
gio/glib-compile-schemas.c:714:29: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
714 | for (i = 0; i < size / sizeof (guint32); i++)
| ^
gio/gsettings-mapping.c: In function ‘g_settings_set_mapping_int’:
gio/gsettings-mapping.c:65:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint64’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
65 | if (0 <= l && l <= G_MAXUINT64)
| ^~
gio/gsettings-mapping.c: In function ‘g_settings_set_mapping_float’:
gio/gsettings-mapping.c:120:23: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint64’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
120 | if (0 <= l && l <= G_MAXUINT64)
| ^~
gio/gsettings-mapping.c: In function ‘g_settings_get_mapping_int’:
gio/gsettings-mapping.c:224:27: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint64’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
224 | return (0 <= l && l <= G_MAXUINT64);
| ^~
gio/gsettings-mapping.c: In function ‘g_settings_get_mapping_float’:
gio/gsettings-mapping.c:269:27: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint64’ {aka ‘long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
269 | return (0 <= l && l <= G_MAXUINT64);
| ^~
fuzzing/fuzz_dbus_message.c:3:1: error: ‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration
3 | const static GDBusCapabilityFlags flags = G_DBUS_CAPABILITY_FLAGS_UNIX_FD_PASSING;
| ^~~~~
This adds g_string_replace(), a function that replaces instances of one string
with another in a GString. It allows the caller to specify the maximum number
of replacements to perform, and returns the number of replacements performed
to the caller.
Fixes: #225
The GDBusConnectionFlags and GDBusServerFlags can affect how we carry
out authentication and authorization, either making it more or less
restrictive, so it's desirable to "fail closed" if a program is compiled
against a new version of GLib but run against an old version.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
