It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
The g_drive_is_removable() support was added recently in gio/gvfs
(see Bug 765900 and Bug 765457). It was also added in gvfs-mount,
but we forgot to add it also in gio-tool-mount.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776169
This patch contains the following changes:
- Print all errors with "gio: " prefix
- Print file uri in error for each tool allowing multiple locations
- Mark all error messages translatable
- Do not leak strings used in error messages
- Always start error messages with capital letter
- Unify some error messages across various tools
- Fix addional/missing new line characters
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776169
This is going to be checked again by g_object_new_with_properties()
and g_object_new_valist() anyway, so might just as well leave it
to those functions to do the check and only do it once. It doesn't
matter which function emits the critical warning in the end either,
as one has to look at a stack trace to find out what code triggered
it in any case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780908
The custom build rules did not have rules for x64 Debug builds during
the refactoring. Fix this by removing all Platform and Configuration
conditions for it, since this is done on are configs in the same manner.
Noted by Ignacio Casal Quinteiro.
The original patch really should have introduced a helper - among
other things it deserves a code comment. We're likely to make
further changes too, so it's obviously better to only do it in one
place.
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761102
Being able to determine that a certificate chain is invalid is not
considered an error, but success. This might not be obvious at first
due to the way the method is named and described currently. Since we
cannot change the name, let's improve the description and clarify this
aspect of its behaviour.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780310
g_dbus_proxy_get_cached_property() and
g_dbus_proxy_get_cached_property_names() can both return NULL if the
property cache is empty. Avoid a crash if this situation arises (which
it looks like it could, from reading the code) by gracefully bailing out
on NULL return values.
Coverity issues: #1257044, #1257045https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741229
socket->priv->timeout is only a guint, and the multiplication is
performed before it’s widened to gint64 to be stored in start_time
(thanks, C). This means any timeout of 50 days or more would overflow.
Fixing this bug makes me feel a real sense of self-worth.
Coverity ID: 1159478
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
request_completion is checked several blocks higher in the function.
Spotted by Coverity.
Coverity ID: 1373215
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
When compiling statically against the system-provided gettext on Mac OS
X, GLib needs to be linked against CoreFramework, which provides some
functions used by gettext.
Fix this by including the necessary macro magic from upstream gettext.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725894
g_object_newv uses a GParameter as argument. Since GParameter
is deprecated due to this type is not introspectible,
g_object_newv is deprecated now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
g_object_new_with_properties is an alternative to g_object_newv.
The last one, takes an array of GParameter. However, GParameter
is a rarely used type and this type is not introspectible, so
it will not work properly in bindings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
The previously documented requirements for implementing init() and
init_async() as completely idempotent were really quite hard to achieve,
and brought a lot of pain for very little gain. Many implementations of
GInitable and GAsyncInitable did not actually follow the requirements,
or did not correctly handle concurrent init_async() calls.
Relax those requirements so that classes can decide whether their init()
or init_async() implementations need to be idempotent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766660
