Previously once the end of addresses was reached it would return
NULL even if it was waiting on a dns response. Now it will keep
waiting so all addresses are received.
Fixes#1680
Currently, the actual asynchronous work, represented by
asynchronous_cancellation_run_task, was over before the GCancellable
could be triggered. While that doesn't invalidate the purpose of the
test, since it's fundamentally about cancellation, it would be
nicer if the cancellation actually served some purpose instead of
being a mere formality.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1608
When calling g_socket_listener_accept_socket_async() on a
GSocketListener with multiple sockets, the accept_ready() callback is
called for the first incoming connection on each socket. It will return
success/failure for the entire accept_socket_async() GTask, and then
free the GSources for listening for incoming connections on the other
sockets in the GSocketListener. The GSources are freed when the GTask is
finalised.
However, if incoming connections arrive for multiple sockets within the
same GMainContext iteration, accept_ready() will be called multiple
times, and will call g_task_return_*() multiple times, before the GTask
is finalised. Calling g_task_return_*() multiple times is not allowed.
Propagate the first success/failure, as before, but then ignore all
subsequent incoming connections until the GTask is finalised.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Once cancelled, a GTask's callback should not only be invoked
asynchronously with respect to the creation of the task, but also with
respect to the GCancellable::cancelled handler. This is particularly
relevant in cases where the cancellation happened in the same thread
where the task is running.
Spotted by Dan Winship and Michael Catanzaro.
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1608
It needs investigating and fixing properly, but let’s not let it disrupt
the CI in the meantime.
Follow-up in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1679.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
To make things consistent across the board as that is the WinSock2 error
code that is received by g_socket_send_message_with_timeout() when it
returns G_POLLABLE_RETURN_WOULD_BLOCK.
This never caused any problems because the default GSettingsBackend is
cached forever by GIOModule anyway.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
I was trying to debug some memory leaks in the gsettings test.
Eventually, it seems that actually they’re caused by the
GMemorySettingsBackend being cached by GIOModule — so this commit makes
no functional changes. It should make the code and documentation a bit
clearer though.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
This mostly affects the 2.56 branch, but, given that GCC 9 is being
stricter about passing null string pointers to printf-like functions, it
might make sense to proactively fix such calls.
gdbusauth.c: In function '_g_dbus_auth_run_server':
gdbusauth.c:1302:11: error: '%s' directive argument is null
[-Werror=format-overflow=]
1302 | debug_print ("SERVER: WaitingForBegin, read '%s'",
line);
|
gdbusmessage.c: In function ‘g_dbus_message_to_blob’:
gdbusmessage.c:2730:30: error: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
2730 | tupled_signature_str = g_strdup_printf ("(%s)", signature_str);
|
The recent changes of the g_app_info_launch_default_for_uri_async()
function ensures that the callback is not called before DBus-activated
applications start. Let's use g_app_info_launch_default_for_uri_async()
and remove the workarounds for DBus-activated applications.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1249
The g_app_info_launch_uris_async() and g_app_info_launch_uris_finish()
functions are crucial to fix g_app_info_launch_default_for_uri_async()
to be really asynchronous.
This patch also adds GDesktopAppInfo implementation of that vfuncs.
The implementation may still use some synchronous calls to local MIME DB.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1347https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1249
In the writev() tests, the handling of cancellation is tested. However,
the GCancellable was cancelled after the writev_async() call was
started. Depending on the implementation of the writev() vfunc, the
operation could be done in a thread or in callbacks on the current
thread’s main loop. If done in a separate thread, there’s a chance that
enough of the write could happen before cancellation reaches that thread
that the overall operation returns success with a short write.
That would cause the test to fail, sometimes.
Avoid that by cancelling the GCancellable before starting the writev()
operation.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Reviewed-by: nobody
It would always be initialized but initialize it to NULL to silence the
compiler, and also check that it is not NULL anymore when we expect it
to contain a valid value.
../gio/tests/desktop-app-info.c: In function ‘test_fallback’:
../gio/tests/desktop-app-info.c:191:18: warning: ‘app’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
g_assert_true (g_app_info_equal (info1, app));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It could've never been uninitialized in this code but the code flow is
not obvious to the compiler. Initialize it to NULL and for clarity also
add an assertion that it is not NULL anymore on usage.
In file included from ../glib/glib.h:62,
from ../gobject/gbinding.h:28,
from ../glib/glib-object.h:23,
from ../gio/gioenums.h:28,
from ../gio/giotypes.h:28,
from ../gio/giomodule.h:28,
from ../gio/giomodule.c:25:
../gio/giomodule.c: In function ‘_g_io_module_get_default’:
../glib/gmessages.h:343:25: warning: ‘extension’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define g_debug(...) g_log (G_LOG_DOMAIN, \
^~~~~
../gio/giomodule.c:912:17: note: ‘extension’ was declared here
GIOExtension *extension, *preferred;
^~~~~~~~~
