glib/gobject
Thomas Haller 092be080c5 gobject: avoid global GRWLock for weak locations in g_object_unref() in some cases
_object_unref_clear_weak_locations() is called twice during
g_object_unref(). In both cases, it is when we expect that the reference
count is 1 and we are either about to call dispose() or finalize().

At this point, we must check for GWeakRef to avoid a race that the ref
count gets increased just at that point.

However, we can do something better than to always take the global lock.

On the object, whenever an object is set to a GWeakRef, set a flag
OPTIONAL_FLAG_EVER_HAD_WEAK_REF. Most objects are not involved with weak
references and won't have this flag set.

If we reach _object_unref_clear_weak_locations() we just (atomically)
checked that the ref count is one. If the object at this point never had
a GWeakRef registered, we know that nobody else could have raced against
obtaining another reference. In this case, we can skip taking the lock
and checking for weak locations.

As most object don't ever have a GWeakRef registered, this significantly
avoids unnecessary work during _object_unref_clear_weak_locations().

This even fixes a hard to hit race in the do_unref=FALSE case.
Previously, if do_unref=FALSE there were code paths where we avoided
taking the global lock. We do so, when quark_weak_locations is unset.
However, that is not race free. If we enter
_object_unref_clear_weak_locations() with a ref-count of 1 and one
GWeakRef registered, another thread can take a strong reference and
unset the GWeakRef. Then quark_weak_locations will be unset, and
_object_unref_clear_weak_locations() misses the fact that the ref count
is now bumped to two. That is now fixed, because once
OPTIONAL_FLAG_EVER_HAD_WEAK_REF is set, it will stick.

Previously, there was an optimization to first take a read lock to check
whether there are weak locations to clear. It's not clear that this is
worth it, because we now already have a hint that there might be a weak
location. Unfortunately, GRWLock does not support an upgradable lock, so
we cannot take an (upgradable) read lock, and when necessary upgrade
that to a write lock.
2024-01-31 17:30:28 +01:00
..
2023-10-16 23:34:04 +01:00
2023-12-31 09:09:48 +00:00
2022-10-13 20:53:56 -04:00
2023-10-16 23:35:05 +01:00
2023-12-31 09:09:48 +00:00
2022-10-13 20:53:56 -04:00
2023-10-16 23:34:24 +01:00
2023-12-19 18:41:02 +00:00
2023-12-19 18:41:02 +00:00
2022-10-13 20:53:56 -04:00
2022-10-13 20:53:56 -04:00
2023-10-23 11:26:53 +01:00
2022-10-13 20:53:56 -04:00
2023-10-23 11:26:53 +01:00