mirror of
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib.git
synced 2024-11-14 05:16:18 +01:00
64 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Backports policy
|
||
===
|
||
|
||
Aims
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
* Known bugs should be fixed in stable versions of GLib
|
||
* New bugs must not be introduced into stable versions of GLib
|
||
* Users and distributors should be able to rely on micro stable releases
|
||
working as drop-in replacements for the previous releases on that stable
|
||
branch, requiring no packaging changes, or recompilation or build system
|
||
changes in dependent projects
|
||
* Effort is only spent on [supported versions](../SECURITY.md#user-content-supported-versions)
|
||
|
||
Policy
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
* Bug fixes and documentation fixes should be backported to the current stable
|
||
branch of GLib, from the current unstable branch
|
||
* Backports should only be done to
|
||
[supported versions](../SECURITY.md#user-content-supported-versions) of GLib
|
||
* New features must not be backported
|
||
* Any change which will require packaging changes in a distribution should not
|
||
be backported unless unavoidable to fix a widely-occurring bug
|
||
* If a backported change does affect packaging or use of GLib, it must be
|
||
listed prominently in the release notes for that stable release
|
||
* Any change which requires changes or additions to translatable strings should
|
||
not be backported unless unavoidable to fix a widely-occurring bug
|
||
- If possible, existing translatable strings should be reused
|
||
- If unavoidable, liaise with the GNOME Translation Team and ensure string
|
||
changes are landed with plenty of time to allow translators to provide new
|
||
translations
|
||
- See https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes
|
||
* API or ABI changes (including API additions) must not be backported
|
||
- A commit which changes the documented behaviour of a function counts as an
|
||
API break
|
||
* It is discretionary whether fixes to test cases, or new test cases, are
|
||
backported, based on a maintainer’s assessment of the effort required to
|
||
backport vs the value in running those tests on a stable branch
|
||
- The risk of backporting changes to tests is that they fail or become flaky,
|
||
and require further work on the stable branch to fix them
|
||
* All backports must be submitted as a merge request against the stable branch,
|
||
must pass through continuous integration, and must be reviewed by a
|
||
maintainer (other than the person submitting the merge request)
|
||
- The reviewer should first assess whether the backport is necessary, and
|
||
then review it as with any other merge request
|
||
- The submitter must set a stable release milestone on the merge request, so
|
||
that the next stable release can’t be accidentally made before it’s merged
|
||
* Typically, backports are trivial cherry-picks of commits from the unstable
|
||
branch — changes to the unstable branch which are intended to be backported
|
||
should be structured so that backporting is easier
|
||
- For example, by splitting changes to be backported into a separate commit
|
||
from those which should not be backported, or splitting out changes which
|
||
are more likely to cause conflicts when cherry-picked
|
||
* Backports should be done as soon as a fix lands on the unstable branch,
|
||
rather than waiting until when the next stable release is due and then
|
||
backporting multiple changes from the unstable branch at once. This gives
|
||
more opportunity for backported changes to be tested, and reduces the chance
|
||
of backporting the wrong thing, or missing a backport.
|
||
* These rules are not entirely prescriptive: there may be situations where
|
||
maintainers agree that a backport is necessary even if it breaks some of
|
||
these rules, due to the balance of fixing a critical bug vs keeping things
|
||
easy for distribution maintainers
|