Updating Kiwi builder for SL Micro 6.1 builds #71

roxenham · 2025-02-12T14:56:53+01:00

roxenham commented

2025-02-12 14:56:53 +01:00

This PR adds support for executing SL Micro 6.1 builds via the Kiwi image builder. This latest code has been tested with the following profiles on a 6.1 build host:

Base (raw)
Default-SelfInstall (iso)
Base-RT (raw + rt-kernel)
Default.4096 (raw with 4096 sector size)

This PR adds support for executing SL Micro 6.1 builds via the Kiwi image builder. This latest code has been tested with the following profiles on a 6.1 build host: - Base (raw) - Default-SelfInstall (iso) - Base-RT (raw + rt-kernel) - Default.4096 (raw with 4096 sector size)

👍 1

roxenham added 1 commit 2025-02-12 14:56:53 +01:00

Updating Kiwi builder for SL Micro 6.1 builds 33dbdec42a

steven.hardy commented

2025-02-12 15:01:33 +01:00

Thanks for taking care of this! Only one comment - we need to update the image tag e.g currently we have:

#!BuildTag: %%IMG_PREFIX%%kiwi-builder:10.1.16.0
#!BuildTag: %%IMG_PREFIX%%kiwi-builder:10.1.16.0-%RELEASE%
FROM registry.suse.com/bci/kiwi:10.1.16

The BCI image is unchanged, so we could just bump to 10.1.16.1 but we might need to update the previous 6.0 image in future, so I wonder if we should bump to a larger number or consider some additional suffix @nbelouin @dprodanov what are your thoughts?

Thanks for taking care of this! Only one comment - we need to update the image tag e.g currently we have: ``` #!BuildTag: %%IMG_PREFIX%%kiwi-builder:10.1.16.0 #!BuildTag: %%IMG_PREFIX%%kiwi-builder:10.1.16.0-%RELEASE% FROM registry.suse.com/bci/kiwi:10.1.16 ``` The BCI image is unchanged, so we could just bump to `10.1.16.1` but we might need to update the previous 6.0 image in future, so I wonder if we should bump to a larger number or consider some additional suffix @nbelouin @dprodanov what are your thoughts?

steven.hardy requested review from nbelouin 2025-02-12 15:01:43 +01:00

steven.hardy requested review from dprodanov 2025-02-12 15:01:48 +01:00

steven.hardy requested review from steven.hardy 2025-02-12 15:01:52 +01:00

nbelouin commented

2025-02-14 15:12:53 +01:00

I think we can go for 10.1.16.1 as if we do update the previous 6.0 image in the future it will be in another edge release than this one, akin to the fact that we potentially build 3.2 and 3.3 with different bases without changing all the images' tag (that's the whole purpose of img_prefix).

I think we can go for `10.1.16.1` as if we do update the previous 6.0 image in the future it will be in another edge release than this one, akin to the fact that we potentially build 3.2 and 3.3 with different bases without changing all the images' tag (that's the whole purpose of `img_prefix`).

roxenham force-pushed micro-6.1-kiwi from 33dbdec42a to 9941385ca8

2025-02-20 10:53:37 +01:00

Compare

steven.hardy approved these changes 2025-02-20 10:57:40 +01:00

steven.hardy left a comment

Thanks!

🚀 1

nbelouin approved these changes 2025-02-20 15:29:35 +01:00

steven.hardy merged commit 4c6d7dea17 into main

2025-02-20 15:38:32 +01:00

roxenham deleted branch micro-6.1-kiwi

2025-02-20 15:48:41 +01:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Reviewers

dprodanov

steven.hardy

nbelouin

3 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: suse-edge/Factory#71