Rather than overloading --verbose, just skip the tests that aren't
supposed to be run in the parent process (so that if you do run the
toplevel test with --verbose, it doesn't immediately error out).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679683
g_test_trap_fork() doesn't work on Windows and is potentially flaky on
unix anyway given the fork-but-don't-exec. Replace it with
g_test_trap_subprocess(), which re-spawns the same program with
arguments telling it to run a specific (otherwise-ignored) test case.
Make the existing g_test_trap_fork() unit tests be unix-only (they
never passed on Windows anyway), and add a parallel set of
g_test_trap_subprocess() tests.
Also fix the logic of gtestutils's "-p" argument (which is used by the
subprocess tests); previously if you had tests "/foo/bar" and
"/foo/bar/baz", and ran the test program with "-p /foo/bar/baz", it
would run "/foo/bar" too. Fix that and add tests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679683
Not sure why it was doing this, but it's not necessary (all of glib's
tests pass fine without it), and it breaks tests that try to use
g_spawn_sync() or GChildWatchSource after doing a g_test_trap_fork().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679683
Although none of the in-tree GSocketConnectable types need it, other
types (like SoupAddress) may find it useful to be able to pass a URI
and a default-port to GProxyAddressEnumerator separately (the same way
you can with GNetworkAddress). So add a default-port property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698877
Ryan accidentally committed some debugging code a long time ago,
causing this file to always use futex emulation even when real futex
support was available. I noticed this a while later and pointed it out
to him, and assumed he was going to fix it, but I guess he assumed I
was going to fix it, and then neither of us did...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699500
Higher order languages with garbage collection can have issues releasing
a binding, as they do not control the last reference being dropped on
the binding, source, or target instances.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698018
The GError should be initialized to NULL, otherwise we'll
"pile up" errors, then try to free an uninitialized pointer.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699493
This ancient code was attempting to cope with (unknown) systems whose
malloc() prototype was incompatible with the standard. This test was
fragile; it would break if the build environment provided -Wall in
CFLAGS.
Now that it's 2013, let's assume that target systems have a sane
malloc(). If someone complains, we can revisit this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/698716
There is some code in the wild (like in gnome-session) that does this
from its custom _constructor() implementation:
{
GObject *obj;
obj = ((chain up));
if (!object_is_viable (obj))
{
g_object_unref (obj);
return NULL;
}
else
return obj;
}
This has never been a valid use of GObject and this code has always
caused memory to be leaked[1] by growing the construction_objects list.
The ability to legitimately return NULL from a constructor was exactly
the reason that we created GInitable, in fact.
That doesn't change the fact that the g_object_new() rewrite will crash
in this case, so instead of doing that, let's emit a critical and avoid
the crash. This will allow people to upgrade their GLib without also
upgrading their gnome-session. Meanwhile, people can fix their broken
code.
[1] not in the strictest sense of the word, because it's still reachable
Not all systems have /usr/bin/true. Some have it in /bin/true.
Instead of trying to guess a hardcoded path to find it, let
g_app_info_create_from_commandline() internally search PATH
to find the program.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698655
Make a number of improvements to g_object_new():
- instead of looking up the GParamSpec for the named property once in
g_object_new() (in order to collect) and then again in g_object_newv
(when actually setting the property), g_object_new_internal() is a
new function that takes the GParamSpec on the interface to avoid the
second lookup
- in the case that ->constructor() is not set, we need not waste time
creating an array of GObjectConstructParam to pass in. Just directly
iterate the list of parameters, calling set_property() on each.
- instead of playing with linked lists to keep track of the construct
properties, realise that the number of construct properties that we
will set is exactly equal to the length of the construct_properties
list on GObjectClass and the only thing that may change is where the
value comes from (in the case that it was passed in)
This assumption was already implicit in the existing code and can be
seen from the sizing of the array used to hold the construct
properties, but it wasn't taken advantage of to make things simpler.
- instead of allocating and filling a separate array of the
non-construct properties just re-iterate the passed-in list and set
all properties that were not marked G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT (since the ones
that were construct params were already used during construction)
- use the new g_param_spec_get_default_value() API instead of
allocating and setting the GValue for each construct property that
wasn't passed from the user
Because we are now iterating the linked list of properties in-order we
need to append to that list during class initialising instead of
prepending.
These changes show a very small improvement on the simple-construction
performance testcase (probably just noise) and they improve the
complex-construction case by ~30%.
Thanks to Alex Larsson for reviews and fixes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698056
The way of getting the default value out of a GParamSpec is to allocate
a GValue, initialise it, then call g_param_spec_set_default() to set the
default value into that GValue.
This is exactly how we handle setting the default value for all of the
construct properties that were not explicitly passed to g_object_new().
Instead of doing the alloc/init/store on all construct properties on
every call to g_object_new(), we can cache those GValues in the private
data of the GParamSpec itself and reuse them.
This patch does not actually make that change to g_object_new() yet, but
it adds the API to GParamSpec so that a future patch to GObject can make
the change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698056