If a g_socket_client_connect_async() operation is cancelled between the
CONNECTING and CONNECTED events (i.e. while in the
g_socket_connection_connect_async() call), the code in
g_socket_client_connected_callback() would previously unconditionally
loop round and try the next socket address from the address enumerator
(by calling enumerator_next_async()). This would correctly handle the
cancellation and return from the overall task — but not before emitting
a spurious RESOLVING event.
Avoid emitting the spurious RESOLVING event by explicitly handling
cancellation at the beginning of g_socket_client_connected_callback().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735179
This function adds a single main option entry to be handeled by
GApplication. The option entry has it arg_data field set to NULL
and will be added to the applications packed_options.
The rationale for this is that bindings will be able to add
command line options even when they can't use the un-boxed struct
GOptionEntry.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727455
As glib-mkenums would likely be used in the building of the other
components of the stack, such as Cogl, Clutter and
gsettings-desktop-schemas, generate that using a Python script (if Python
can be found) and "install" it.
Not all instances have a TypeNode associated (e.g. GstEvent), so lets check if node is available
before trying to use it.
This crash can be easily reproduced by creating an event with gst_event_new_eos and using
G_IS_OBJECT on the event instance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733982
As an example, the core of gedit is in a private library
placed in %INSTALLDIR%/lib/gedit/libgedit.dll
Before this patch we would get %INSTALLDIR%/lib/gedit as the
installation package dir, while what we actually want is to get
%INSTALLDIR%
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733934
Practically no caller of these functions require atomic behaviour,
but the atomics are much slower than normal operations, which makes
it desirable to get rid of them. We have not done this before because
that would be a break of the ABI.
However, I recently looked into this and it seems that even if the
atomics *are* used for g_clear_* it is not ever safe to use this. The
atomics protects two threads that are racing to free a global/shared
object from freeing the object twice. However, any *user* of the global
object have no protection from the object being freed while in use,
because there is no paired operation the reads and refs the object
as an atomic unit (nor can such an operation be implemented using
purely atomic ops).
So, since nothing could safely have used the atomic aspects of these
functions I consider it acceptable to just remove it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733969
It turns out that this bug actually would (sometimes) impact any sort of
fixed-sized array with an alignment requirement of 8 due to incorrectly
counting the alignment inserted between the (aligned 4) array length and
the actual data.
Fix this properly and remove the exception for doubles.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732754
We're using a precondition in the middle of the function, and if we
hit it, we leak the closure.
Let's allocate the closure per path; this allows us to allocate it
before path-specific preconditions, and better avoids a pointless
malloc/free pair in the unhandled case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733576
This reverts commit 7269d75321.
Adding G_STATIC_ASSERT() into a header file caused compilation
problems with at least one app (Anjuta). Reverting to keep
GNOME continuous testing running.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730932
