g_file_read() was returning G_IO_ERROR_IS_DIRECTORY when you tried to
open a directory on unix, but G_IO_ERROR_PERMISSION_DENIED on win32.
Fix that, and add a test to tests/file.c
Pointed out on IRC by Paweł Forysiuk.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669330
This is useful when using certain D-Bus services where the
PropertiesChanged signal does not include the property value such as
e.g. various systemd mechanisms, see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37632
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
These tests were written, but then never used since it was decided to
add g_warnings() to goption.c in the cases they were supposed to be
testing. So anyway, just remove them.
This explains the current disabling of HAVE_IF_NAMETOINDEX as we are
still supporting Windows XP. This is expected to change when the patch
for XP support for if_nametoindex in accepted into master.
Given
typedef enum MyFoo MyFoo;
glib-mkenums would get confused, not notice the ";", and then keep
skipping lines until it found one that started with a "{", possibly
even going into the next file.
Fix it to just ignore those lines instead (and also, to error out if
it hits eof while parsing an enum).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669595
Added projects to compile the glib-compile-resources and gresource(-tool)
utility programs during the Visual C++ 2010 build process, "install"
the resulting binaries upon successful compilation, and dist the new
.vcxproj and .vcxproj.filters files.
Also updated the property sheet and "install" project to make sure the new
.exe's are indeed "installed" and removed from the "install" project the
dependency on the testglib project as testglib is not an exhausive test on
GLib and people might want to make that project compile different test
programs as they might need.
Just wondering: I have updated the property sheet to create the
gconstructor_as_data.h header for glib-compile-resources, but is it better
to dist that generated header instead as the VS 2008/2010 projects will
depend on a working installation of PERL on Windows?
Make the "install" project depend on the glib-compile-resources gresource
projects so that these tools will be indeed installed. Missed that in my
last commit-oops.
Also make the "install" project not to depend on the testglib project as:
-the test program in the project is not an exhausive test of the GLib
libraries
-One may want to use the project to compile different test program(s), so
it might be better to keep the project but not "install" the resulting
.exe
Add projects to build the glib-compile-resources and gresource(-tool)
utilities, and "install" these tools upon successful compilation, and dist
the new projects.
One piece of note: will it be better to dist gconstructor_as_data.h instead
of generating it in the VS build process (I generated it in the property
sheet update in this commit)?
Visual C++ 2010 projects will follow shortly.
When set to represent a zoneinfo file, TZ may start with :, therefore
glib needs to check it and ignore the first char when building the
resulting filename, or it won't be found.
Also, the path could be absolute, in which case it is wrong to
append /usr/share/timezone
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664237
==1265== 84 (8 direct, 76 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 793 of 827
==1265== at 0x4029467: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==1265== by 0x408479B: standard_calloc (gmem.c:104)
==1265== by 0x4084846: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:189)
==1265== by 0x4084B2D: g_malloc0_n (gmem.c:385)
==1265== by 0x4228A98: g_resource_load (gresource.c:253)
==1265== by 0x804A56D: test_resource_registred (resources.c:198)
==509== 700 (20 direct, 680 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 828 of 837
==509== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==509== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==509== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==509== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==509== by 0x405396B: g_bytes_new_with_free_func (gbytes.c:173)
==509== by 0x405390D: g_bytes_new_take (gbytes.c:122)
==509== by 0x804A48C: test_resource_data (resources.c:174)
==29204== 11,456 (84 direct, 11,372 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 859 of 861
==29204== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==29204== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==29204== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==29204== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==29204== by 0x409B227: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1029)
==29204== by 0x41936CF: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1872)
==29204== by 0x417CCC9: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1839)
==29204== by 0x417C6F4: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1703)
==29204== by 0x417CC5A: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1820)
==29204== by 0x417C1DB: g_object_new (gobject.c:1535)
==29204== by 0x41E5E29: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==29204== by 0x4228D38: g_resource_open_stream (gresource.c:363)
This bug was exposed by fixing the following leak in the resources test:
==29204== 11,456 (84 direct, 11,372 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 859 of 861
==29204== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==29204== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==29204== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==29204== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==29204== by 0x409B227: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1029)
==29204== by 0x41936CF: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1872)
==29204== by 0x417CCC9: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1839)
==29204== by 0x417C6F4: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1703)
==29204== by 0x417CC5A: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1820)
==29204== by 0x417C1DB: g_object_new (gobject.c:1535)
==29204== by 0x41E5E29: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==29204== by 0x4228D38: g_resource_open_stream (gresource.c:363)
==29204== 7,192 (76 direct, 7,116 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 855 of 861
==29204== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==29204== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==29204== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==29204== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==29204== by 0x409B227: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1029)
==29204== by 0x41936CF: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1872)
==29204== by 0x417CCC9: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1839)
==29204== by 0x417C6F4: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1703)
==29204== by 0x417CC5A: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1820)
==29204== by 0x417C1DB: g_object_new (gobject.c:1535)
==29204== by 0x424E815: g_zlib_decompressor_new (gzlibdecompressor.c:270)
==29204== by 0x4228DD8: g_resource_lookup_data (gresource.c:422)
==28778== 700 (20 direct, 680 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 842 of 863
==28778== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==28778== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==28778== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==28778== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==28778== by 0x405396B: g_bytes_new_with_free_func (gbytes.c:173)
==28778== by 0x405390D: g_bytes_new_take (gbytes.c:122)
==28778== by 0x804C2B1: test_uri_query_info (resources.c:435)
==28318== 38 (12 direct, 26 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 613 of 865
==28318== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==28318== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==28318== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==28318== by 0x4084AB4: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:361)
==28318== by 0x4229599: g_resources_enumerate_children (gresource.c:806)
==28318== by 0x804B39E: test_resource_registred (resources.c:283)
==27820== 31 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 587 of 866
==27820== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==27820== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==27820== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==27820== by 0x4084AB4: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:361)
==27820== by 0x409D6A1: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:356)
==27820== by 0x4069FF7: g_get_current_dir (gfileutils.c:2544)
==27820== by 0x804BCA7: test_resource_module (resources.c:370)
==27020== 44 (24 direct, 20 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 684 of 936
==27020== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==27020== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==27020== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==27020== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==27020== by 0x40BC038: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:969)
==27020== by 0x40B5277: g_variant_get_variant (gvariant.c:749)
==27020== by 0x4273182: gvdb_table_value_from_item (gvdb-reader.c:478)
==27020== by 0x42731E8: gvdb_table_get_value (gvdb-reader.c:509)
==27020== by 0x4228B36: do_lookup (gresource.c:280)
==27020== by 0x4228F56: g_resource_get_info (gresource.c:492)
==26427== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 608 of 965
==26427== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==26427== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==26427== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==26427== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==26427== by 0x40BC038: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:969)
==26427== by 0x40BA89F: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4482)
==26427== by 0x40BAC23: g_variant_get_va (gvariant.c:4681)
==26427== by 0x40BAB29: g_variant_get (gvariant.c:4633)
==26427== by 0x4228BA5: do_lookup (gresource.c:293)
==26427== by 0x4228F51: g_resource_get_info (gresource.c:493)
==9458== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 16 of 39
==9458== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==9458== by 0x4221A1F: vasprintf (vasprintf.c:78)
==9458== by 0x40C6065: g_vasprintf (gprintf.c:314)
==9458== by 0x409D894: g_strdup_vprintf (gstrfuncs.c:509)
==9458== by 0x409D8C9: g_strdup_printf (gstrfuncs.c:535)
==9458== by 0x40672E9: g_environ_setenv (genviron.c:156)
==9458== by 0x80490E7: test_environ_array (environment.c:78)
==9458== by 0x40A3DB5: test_case_run (gtestutils.c:1662)
==9458== by 0x40A40B2: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1715)
==9458== by 0x40A417C: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1726)
==9458== by 0x40A42F9: g_test_run_suite (gtestutils.c:1771)
==9458== by 0x40A3441: g_test_run (gtestutils.c:1319)
==9458== by 0x80493F1: main (environment.c:108)
Bug #669412.
